• KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    262·
    3 days ago

    So plenty of people have pointed out this tweet is forged, but similar sentiment has been shared by Andrew Tate, Nick Fuentes, and other “manosphere”/alt-right grifters.

    I just want to put out clearly what these men mean, and what the dog-whistle here is: They are not saying a man with a penis fucking a woman’s pussy is gay. They are saying that a man following all the acts of affection and consideration to the physical and emotional wants and needs of your partner is: effeminate, inferior, non-masculine, and therefore “gay”. This is what incels argue when they complain about “modern women” and divorce and “gold diggers”. Being anything less than an egotist, entitle, aggressive prick is “gay”; and they know just as well as their critics, that few women would take a relationship like that.

    The Turning Point USA/Heritage Foundation evangelical-type want women as Second-Class Citizens. The manosphere/incel type want women as property --[sold from father to husband] property. (Well, that’s the vision they sell. The grifters want men single and alone; shut-in and consuming their content.)

    • andros_rex@lemmy.worldOP
      3·
      5 days ago

      The way the alt right has been working for the past ten years has been saying something absolutely outrageous, and then claiming it’s a joke/satire afterwords. It’s a way of introducing those ideas into the mainstream while maintaining plausible deniability. They started by “joking” that we should repeal the 19th amendment, but the goal is to shift the Overton window. Any “satire” is a fig leaf.

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    37·
    6 days ago

    FELLAS, Is it GAY to have a girlfriend? You’re literally dating someone who likes MEN!

    FELLAS, is it GAY to breath? You’re literally breathing in shit that’s been inside other men.

    FELLAS, is it GAY to fucking EXIST? A PART OF YOU CAME OUT A MAN’S BALLS!

  • kate@lemmy.uhhoh.comEnglish
    30·
    6 days ago

    Let me make this loud and clear. If you’re a gay man with a boyfriend in 2025, you’re straight.

    • musubibreakfast@lemmy.world
      28·
      6 days ago

      There’s nothing more heterosexual than sex with another man. The vagina is too soft, feminine and accommodating. To raw-dog or be raw-dogged by another man takes strength, determination and perseverance. These are values that are exemplified in a healthy heterosexual relationship, therefore gay is straight and straight is gay.

  • kameecoding@lemmy.world
    40·
    7 days ago

    It’s all about the transitive property, if you have a sex with a girl, you are having sex with all the guys she had sex with, that’s pretty gay.

    On the other hand having sex with chad who slept with plenty of women, by the transitive property you are having sex with all those women. That straight as fuck.

    • some_random_nick@lemmy.world
      3·
      7 days ago

      If the first dude slept with women who slept with men, that makes him gay.
      But then the other dude sleeps with him, making him second-hand gay?
      Just like with passive smoking.

      • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
        2·
        5 days ago

        Obviously, assuming both the woman and the chad slept with 10 people before, the first guy is 10 gay. The second guy is (1-10)=-9 gay, which is pretty straight.

        The math doesn’t lie, I’m sorry, I don’t make the rules.

  • lefixxx@lemmy.world
    36·
    7 days ago

    phew i was sucking dicks left and right and i was worried i was gay. But since i dont have a gf…

    • nomy@lemmy.zipEnglish
      5·
      6 days ago

      Sounds like you spend a lot of time hanging out with men. Nothing straighter than some men spending quality time together.

  • Diddlydee@feddit.ukEnglish
    52·
    7 days ago

    He spends waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much time thinking about cocks and gay men.

    Or exactly as much as you’d expect.

    • Pope-King Joe@lemmy.worldEnglish
      11·
      7 days ago

      I’ve always said he’s the most closeted gay man on the planet. I’ve never seen a man as insecure as he is about his masculinity.

      Not that I think that gay men are less masculine.

  • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    26·
    6 days ago

    this is like that 4chan greentext about how you can’t watch porn if you’re a fragile straight because straight porn is gay since it has a naked guy and lesbian porn is gay because it’s actually gay

    These people are morons but the ones at the top like him are psychotic. They’re purposely trying to get their “followers” isolated from anyone that may soften their views and talk sense into them. I’m sure Tate and similar “influencers” know tons of incel/mra/nofap/redpill/mde/etc types that buy into this shit soften their views considerably (and stop buying and watching shit) when they finally get a partner

    • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      8·
      6 days ago

      These people are morons but the ones at the top like him are psychotic. They’re purposely trying to get their “followers” isolated from anyone that may soften their views and talk sense into them.

      Yeah that’s basically the goal here. This is classic cult tactics that are used by your classic “Drink the Koolaid” cults but also terrorist groups.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      5·
      6 days ago

      Common lesbian porn isn’t gay. Who doesn’t want to be a woman pounded by another woman?

      • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
        2·
        5 days ago

        Wasn’t the greentext about how a woman with a penis having sex with one without a penis is the most straight? Something like hetero sex is 50% gay to watch, woman-with-penis on woman-without-penis is 25% gay, and two women-without-penis is again fully gay.

        It’s like rock paper scissors with trans and homophobia, but you have to give credit for at least having a consistent world view.

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    18·
    6 days ago

    Andrew Tate is a very capable scammer. He says dumb shit like this such that he’ll be shared, then he’ll bring you into the sales funnel by first of all saying something that sounds very reasonable but aligns with his views in the background. This is just to get you listening and then slowly but surely he’s going to radicalise you into the online manosphere.