Firefox maker Mozilla deleted a promise to never sell its users’ personal data and is trying to assure worried users that its approach to privacy hasn’t fundamentally changed. Until recently, a Firefox FAQ promised that the browser maker never has and never will sell its users’ personal data. An archived version from January 30 says:

Does Firefox sell your personal data?

Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That’s a promise.

That promise is removed from the current version. There’s also a notable change in a data privacy FAQ that used to say, “Mozilla doesn’t sell data about you, and we don’t buy data about you.”

The data privacy FAQ now explains that Mozilla is no longer making blanket promises about not selling data because some legal jurisdictions define “sale” in a very broad way:

Mozilla doesn’t sell data about you (in the way that most people think about “selling data”), and we don’t buy data about you. Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of “sale of data” is extremely broad in some places, we’ve had to step back from making the definitive statements you know and love. We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable) is stripped of any identifying information, or shared only in the aggregate, or is put through our privacy preserving technologies (like OHTTP).

Mozilla didn’t say which legal jurisdictions have these broad definitions.

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    46 minutes ago

    We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable) is stripped of any identifying information, or shared only in the aggregate,

    Fuck off Mozilla. Maybe don’t pay CEOs millions and don’t force things like Pocket and LLMs on users if you want to be commercially viable, I’d gladly pay for Firefox that doesn’t make me dodge new features and services. But it would be a donation towards development of a browser that is commons, since you have no product to sell, only GPL’d code that’s mine as much as yours.

    You have NO fucking leverage, Firefox is better than Chrome, but there’s projects that will gladly repackage your code with no telemetry whatsoever for any platform while you’re brainstorming just the right amount of monetization to prevent the frog from jumping.

    It’s kind of sad I don’t use Chrome and therefore never think of it, while I like and use Firefox and am therefore constantly at odds with Mozilla.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    40 minutes ago

    I mean you could argue that them defaulting to Google search is already them selling your data. Google definitely pay them for that.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is why I am an advocate for publicly-funded Internet, like how people fund NPR and BBC.

    I don’t blame Firefox because at the end of the day, they are still a business and need to cover the operating cost. I blame the system that we’re in and the elites will tell you there is no other alternative.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      and the elites will tell you there is no other alternative

      That’s like blaming wolves for eating you when it’s winter, they are hungry and you are in the forest

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      What operating costs? You could argue there are development costs, but development is driven by the community. The only operating costs are forced stalking behavior.

  • Lit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    please pay me if you want to sell my data. At the end of the day I am a business and need to cover operating cost.

    Is there an open source tool to generate fake user activity data for Firefox to consume?

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    5 hours ago

    current acting CEO of Mozilla is Laura Chambers. An Australian native and has quite…interesting work history.

    1000001226

    It’s weird isn’t it? how these same names keep coming up again and again…

    Ebay, Paypal, Airbnb.

    she would have likely worked with Thiel and Musk during her time there. I wonder if there’s any lingering commitment there?

    • Kurroth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 hours ago

      As an Australian.Do not trust us when it comes to privacy, security especially in tech or the digital space.

      We are not a nation descendant of ‘convicts’ but of prison guards and other colonial boot lickers.

      We are US lite or US 10years ago or maybe their tearing ground. Can’t figure it out.

      • Fashim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah don’t trust us, we’ve gutted all forms of STEM that aren’t directly related to digging shit out of the ground for Gina Rinehart and co

        Serious intellectual brain drain in this country now, we really are the US 10 years ago, hopefully the US explodes enough to stop all our idiots blindly following their jingoism to our doom

    • GoldenQuetzal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Glad you shared this. I hate to be That Tin Foil Hat Person but it seems really convenient that a Musk and Thiel tied CEO happens to take over the one browser base that isn’t Chromium just before people start moving to it for privacy in escalating numbers.

    • A7thStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      McKinsey is honestly scarier. They may not be a household name like the others, but look them up. They are frightening.

  • nthavoc@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I remember a time when Google wrote “Don’t be evil” all over their stuff…

    • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 hours ago

      dude i worked in a buncha different college libraries around the time of google’s initial ascension. Google slayed. it was awesome, in 2000.

      now? google is a drippy search engine.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There’s a phrase that is still very close to that in some company statement still, I sort of view it as pointless to talk about. We know they’re evil by their actions, and they were evil before they removed it in sure. If the statement is what matters, it’s still basically there, just not the motto. It’s just not worth worrying or talking about. They do so much worse shit. A friend of mine was recently let go after protesting about their response to the genocide in Gaza.

  • FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Gahhhh this is horrible

    I spent some time switching to Librewolf this morning but at the end of the day, it having Firefox as the upstream means it’s all fragile and tenuous anyway

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    They can’t just promise they “never will” and then get rid of it. People who used the service under the original agreement should still be able to claim that benefit since it was promising to never sell it.

  • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Several questions:

    1. How are they getting our data?
    2. What is the nature of the data?
    3. Can we do anything in about:config?
    • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 hours ago

      How are they getting our data?

      By setting up small pieces of code that trigger when you use a given feature, and send a network request to Mozilla’s servers with either a single flag set to just show a feature was used, in general, or more additional data with context (e.g. how long the text is that users are putting into their new AI sidebar feature)

      What is the nature of the data?

      This section of their Privacy Notice explains what categories of telemetry data they collect.

      Can we do anything in about:config?

      None needed. The normal settings menu has you covered. Go to Settings > Privacy & Security > Firefox Data Collection and Use > Allow Firefox to send technical and interaction data to Mozilla

  • Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Aaaand that’s why I switched to Brave. If you have shit performance and are selling my data, what’s the redeeming quality? 8gb of RAM should be enough to browse the internet. IDK why Firefox insists it isn’t…

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 minutes ago

      You’re a good friend

      Edit: also the style shows through, not everyone can get a watercolor vibe without the water

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Would you like to see my tattoo of Tom from MySpace I got on my left testicle? Hey man, in 2005 it seemed like MySpace Tom would be in our lives forever. Why WOULDN’T you get his profile picture inked into your body with needles on the most painful part of your body? It made sense in 2005!

        But noooooooooo! Facebook had to be a dick. And now whenever I pull my pants down in front of some hot 20 year old with daddy issues, she’s like “Is that your uncle or something?”

        Meanwhile Tom sold my MySpace for hundreds of millions of dollars, and now does photography of bikini models on his yacht! While I have to explain who Tom is to Gen Z…

        sigh

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Honestly at this point, I wouldn’t be embarrassed having a tattoo of Tom from MySpace.

        • outdated2139@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          For a second I thought Tom did photography and bikini models on his yacht. We’ll he probably does, but I just read your comment wrong.

          • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I mean, he’s worth hundreds of millions, on a yacht that he owns with hotties in bikinis hoping to get discovered as their own ticket to fame from the photos being taken of their oiled up sexy bodies.

            The sex was implied.