Summary

Trump plans to lift the Biden administration’s freeze on supplying 2,000-pound bombs to Israel and reverse sanctions against Israeli settlers.

  • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Good thing all those “Genocide Joe” voters abstained from the election

    Something bad could have happened to those Palestinians

    Good job

    • lemmingthelemmers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It did totally and completely under his watch. Gaza was holocausted under the Presidency of 1 Joseph Robbinette Biden Jr. Aka Genocide Joe.

      He gave them over 14,000 (FOURTEEN THOUSAND) 2000lb bombs that they used to flatten Gaza. There are ample pictures. Go look. Go look at the bad GENOCIDE JOE did to the Gazans in the name of America.

      Or did you only start paying attention to Gaza when Trump was inaugurated?

      • thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        and now it’s about to get even fucking worse. it was a choice between kamala harris and fucking trump. Yeah, both suck. But one of them will actively make things way worse.

          • thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            you think it’s going to stop at Gaza? Guarantee, israel will destroy the west bank next. and trump will provide even more weapons than biden ever did.

            • lemmingthelemmers@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              You may be correct, but maybe now the TDS democrats will join the rest of the anti-genocide movement because their guy isn’t overseeing the genocide anymore. They have the bad guy they want now.

              Or they are going try to mock and belittle people who didn’t fall in line to vote for with THE WORST PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN HISTORY who clearly had no intent to stop the evil destruction. Their imaginary scenarios become the dogma they are blinded by.

              • thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                i actually agree with you. the dews are worse than useless. they do literally nothing and field garbage candidates and wonder why they lose. we need a better party.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    After Genocide Joe and Holocaust Harris, we have Destroying Donnie. Too bad #destroyingdonnie won’t be amplified by Xitter like the previous two was, to try to sway voters.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Make no mistake if they think twisting the algorithm is going to make the voices of the left less disruptive they have no fucking clue what it is like to fight people who believe in their beliefs because they ernestly think they will help and save people.

      We were going at Biden and Harris with kid gloves on because we knew Trump was going to be much worse, but the kid gloves are off and leftists will do everything up to and including dying for what we think is right… because we aren’t full of shit like the cowards in power are.

      I dare them to kick us out of social media conversations, we are just going to become more radicalized into taking direct action instead of asking nicely.

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          Fascists will never see you coming out of the night in your acts of resistance because to predict your actions consistently requires actually understanding what makes you tick, and to do that requires recognizing at some level that you have something they do not, integrity in your beliefs, whereas their mental landscape is a barren monoculture of childish hate and bullshit.

          • FediNeko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            I’ve been masking since 2020, neighbors think I’m pro Trump, oh if they knew…well if they knew, i’m sure my windows would be gone already.

            “Oh your flag on your truck got stolen last night?!! what scum!” 😱

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    18 hours ago

    To the Muslim MAGA voters, that’s 2000 lbs, multiples, of Fuck Around and Find Out.

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Where is this take simultaneously coming from for everyone?

      Guys. NOBODY. THOUGHT. TRUMP. WAS. BETTER. Now we can finally acknowledge that the American so-called “left” political party is so obscenely fucked that they’re complicit in genocide? Literally the hallmark of Nazi Germany? Perhaps we as a people do not really have a lot of choice going on, and impotently choosing between two fascist parties election after election is not going to gradually bring us to democratic reform?

      • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Trump is so much worse than Harris and Biden though. He lifted this ban, recognizes the settlements and will prevent any other free election that could better things in the future. So if you didnt vote for Harris you didnt just completely doom palestinians but also your country.

        • dx1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          He lifted this ban,

          I’ll say it again. Biden sent FOURTEEN THOUSAND of these bombs already - and that was as of 7 months ago. Enough to literally wipe out half of the population of Gaza.

          recognizes the settlements

          The fact that you’d say this without specifying which ones really speaks to how little you know about this. The Golan Heights, which the Biden admin already calls as “Israel”? East Jerusalem & the West Bank, which the Clinton admin bantustan-ized in the Oslo Accords and which every subsequent admin recognizes the Palestine side of even less? The Biden administration does not recognize the international consensus on “Israel” having the pre-1967 borders. They don’t recognize Palestine, at odds with the international consensus. The entire country was literally formed by ethnic cleansing in the first place. The Biden administration did like three token sanctions on random West Bank settlers, with no recognition that state officials were behind the policy of annexation and the complicity of the military in it.

          And what “free election”? 8 years of Biden & Obama admins came and went. The last election in Palestine was under BUSH, and the official U.S. policy, after Hamas (which is a political party, mind you) won a majority of seats in the parliamentary runoff election, was to support the Palestinian Authority in overthrowing the results of the election in an illegal coup, resulting in the civil war that left Hamas in power in Gaza. The U.S. rejection of the election results has been the norm across Bush 2, Obama, Trump 1, and Biden. Not to mention that the entire premise of an election - democracy - is at odds with the fundamentally Jewish supremacist nature of “Israel”, a state founded on ethnic “purism”, exclusion, apartheid and genocide of an indigenous population, and endless regional expansionist warfare. The U.S. policy is “we accept a complete racial divide and military occupation based on the supremacy of that race in the region, but oh yeah, we’d love if the underclass might eventually have elections or something…I mean, as long as they vote for who we want”.

          So if you didnt vote for Harris you didnt just completely doom palestinians but also your country.

          You think because, out of all the non-Trump voters, your group was in the majority, that everyone who didn’t side with you must have been wrong. But you voted for an absolute monster and psychopath, as willfully complicit in genocide as Biden (who you would have voted for also) was. You people split the vote from candidates who aren’t complicit in mass murder, and you still have the gall to accuse everyone else of being the problem. The person you voted for was so far beneath the standards of a free and decent society that some of us couldn’t even stomach it (and not even enough to swing the election, mind you).

          It’s always the refrain of people doing something horribly immoral, that anybody taking the higher road is just doing “virtue signalling” or “preaching their moral purity”. This is just rationalization. You cannot confront your own faults, the deep, horrific faults of your society, so you blame the few lone dissenters who realize that absolute fundamental change is the only path out of this. The 1% of people who voted De la Cruz or Stein did not decide the outcome of this election. 98% of you voted for an absolute monster.

          Now what is the point of a representative democracy? We pick the candidate that will do the best by us. Right? You have all completely abandoned that premise. Every election, a D and an R run, one of them wins, they do absolutely whatever they want, and as long as you think the Republicans are even 0.0001% worse, you’ll vote for the D. You never abandon that group. This completely sacrifices any power the people have, because we don’t have federal referendums, we don’t have non-FPTP elections, we don’t have recalls, we don’t have no confidence votes, we don’t have null votes, we ONLY get to vote in these elections, and our single power to control this system is completely neutered. All they have to do is find a single issue where they even SOUND better than the Republicans on, and they can be as absolutely corrupt as they want.

          Why do you not blame the ~48% Democrat voters for not gathering behind a candidate who isn’t a war criminal? Or the ~49% Trump voters? Does it not cause any self-reflection that the crime of all crimes, genocide, is no longer a red line for you in a politician? What is your long-term strategy to bring this genocidal system back under the control of the people - voting for the people who are operating it, without question, forever? Cause I don’t think that’s gonna work.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Because EVERY discussion had like fifteen tankies going “BuT YoU NeEd A REasON fOr Us tO voTe thAt IsN’T TrUMp!11”

        • dx1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          And the disproof of that argument is Trump sending the 2,000 pound “bunker buster” bombs?

          You know how many Biden sent? FOURTEEN. THOUSAND: https://www.reuters.com/world/us-has-sent-israel-thousands-2000-pound-bombs-since-oct-7-2024-06-28/ That’s as of last June.

          Those bombs can wipe out a hundred people (and did, over and over). You know how many fighting members Hamas (Al Qassam) was supposed to have had as of Oct 7? Forty thousand. Do the math. And then go take a look at the pictures coming out of Gaza this week.

          I don’t know how you guys don’t get this. Biden’s policy on Palestine was “no holds barred genocide with lip service otherwise”. Trump is the same thing minus the lip service. I think you all need to take a break from talking about this until you’ve figured out what the hell is going on. Because seriously, if you don’t even know what’s happening, you’re just reacting in fight or flight mode, it’s like you’re pouring water on an electric fire.

          And honestly - your whole depiction of what the “tankies” are saying - are we supposed to rely on your mocking portrayal of them? What did they actually say? Who are we talking about specifically? What was their full argument?

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      20 hours ago

      He blocked the 2,000 lb. bombs and the 500 lb. bombs. Then he lifted the restriction on the 500 lb. bombs.

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I thought he slightly delayed one shipment? At one point I recall Biden removing the restriction as well. I am genuinely wondering whether there was even still a restriction on 2000 pound bombs since Biden recently sent another 8 billion in bombs to Israel.

        • dx1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          This was exactly the point of him doing it like this. Notice your confusion on the specifics. People hear about the restriction, but not the lifting. Creates a fog of ambiguity, US media doesn’t report on the actual arm shipment statistics, Democrats get the illusion he’s actually doing something good. Meanwhile, the bombs he sent were enough to demolish Gaza - and did. Already. I think the last statistic was “88% destroyed”, though that’s from memory.

          • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            88% destroyed is such a weird ass nazi dog whistle. Not about you, just ironic. Of course it’s 88%.

            • dx1@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Gotta be something in between 87 and 89. I don’t know, that was the last stat I heard ~yesterday morning.

                • Uruanna@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  Because you’re calling that statistic a Nazi dog whistle, and that means you’re saying it’s fake / fabricated and pro-Nazi propaganda somehow. It may not be what you intended, but it is the meaning of the phrasing you used.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    hey pro-Palestinian lemmings! where y’all at?

    this is why you wouldn’t vote for Harris, right? when does he stop the killing again?

    #when does it stop??

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      No one said Trump would stop it. We said that Biden/Harris shouldn’t be enabling it.

      And that made centrists very, very angry.

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      I think of the millions of “pro-Palestinian lemmings”, there were all of like five that said Trump would help. Everyone else looked soberly at the bipartisan support for genocide, which you seem unwilling to acknowledge.

      I think the tally at this point is about 30 billion dollars worth of arms sent to “Israel” since Oct '23. 99% of that under Biden. Breaking domestic and international law in doing so. That is the largest foreign benefactor of the U.S., a fundamentally apartheid state engaged in genocide for 77 years, more brutally and unashamedly than ever before since '23. Again, this is violating the Leahy Law, U.S. domestic prohibitions on the commission or complicity in genocide, the UN Genocide Convention, likely the Geneva Conventions, and other international law. I would love for someone with your stance to explain why Biden engaged in this, because I think you’re just floundering trying to describe this situation without that key piece of information.

      Hope that helps. Not sure why you are looking to excuse complicity in genocide by drawing a D/R division where there really is not one. IMO what you’re doing in posting this is extremely immoral and I urge you to reconsider your views.

      P.S.:

      https://www.reuters.com/world/us-has-sent-israel-thousands-2000-pound-bombs-since-oct-7-2024-06-28

      WASHINGTON, June 28 (Reuters) - The Biden administration has sent to Israel large numbers of munitions, including more than 10,000 highly destructive 2,000-pound bombs and thousands of Hellfire missiles, since the start of the war in Gaza, said two U.S. officials briefed on an updated list of weapons shipments.

      Between the war’s start last October and recent days, the United States has transferred at least 14,000 of the MK-84 2,000-pound bombs, 6,500 500-pound bombs, 3,000 Hellfire precision-guided air-to-ground missiles, 1,000 bunker-buster bombs, 2,600 air-dropped small-diameter bombs, and other munitions, according to the officials, who were not authorized to speak publicly.

      As someone who’s actually been following the individual arm shipments, the implication that there is any difference is literally insane. Biden was shoveling coal into the genocide engine as fast as humanly possible.

      • Halosheep@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yeah! If both of them are bad on this one thing then it shouldn’t matter if the worse option goes in! Yeah!

    • FantasticDonkey@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Palestinian here, not in the US. So Harris would have done genocide but without more 2000 pound bombs. Trump does it with them.

      Your voters couldn’t decide against genocide, they could only decide with which weapons it will be continued. You guys have a problem.

      Edit: greetings to the Lemmy Hasbara division. Responses are kinda wild, didn’t expect this. I should post more here.

      • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Biden already sent 14,000 of those bombs so you’re wrong. Both candidates are pro genocide.

        I was hopeful about the peace deal with the Muslim countries signing on but as usual our politicians flood everything with shit so no one knows that’s up or down.

      • rational_lib@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Does anyone decide against genocide when it suits them? There’s some irony in both Palestine and Israel supporters whining to the Democrats about not opposing the respective genocides hard enough while ignoring their Hamas and Netanyahu doing it to the other side. Take the log out of your own eye before complaining about the speck in the other’s.

        On a rational level, we all need to oppose killing of civilians and children. But man, it’s hard to convince people to care when the people you’re trying to save won’t help themselves.

        • FantasticDonkey@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I don’t think I understand your comment. You think it’s hard to side against genocide? Because that’s what most of us are doing here.

          • fxomt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            12 hours ago

            He’s an enlightened centrist, ignore him. The fact that people think hamas (which are bad, of course) are as bad as the IDF is actually insane.

            On a rational level, we all need to oppose killing of civilians and children

            He’s right on this point but the rest of his comment is just bothsiding a genocide.

            Sorry you had to deal with these types of people in this thread.

            الله يوفقك يا صاحبي

          • rational_lib@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            And is it working?

            Point being, the whole “genocide” thing is useless because people don’t care. No one thinks they’re committing a genocide. If you went to Nazi Germany, they’d tell you the holocaust is not a genocide, it’s a security measure or something like that. Just like you probably don’t look at Oct. 7 as a genocide. It’s the same thing. We’re all human, we’re all easily tricked into being monsters.

            • Uruanna@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              You’re mixing up what people say and what they think. Biden and Blinken both denied the war crimes and the genocide, and we have evidence that they knew what it was. Nazi Germany might have spread propaganda about security, but they DEFINITELY knew they were exterminating entire “races”. Maybe not the randos in the streets, but anyone operating in a camp or the government.

              Propaganda is not what these people actually believe, it’s the tool they use to give cowards plausible deniability. Those participating actively, and those not stopping it.

              Yes, there are people who are in fact monsters.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        so…what’s being Palestinian got to do with your message other than showing your opinion is biased?

        also, thanks for giving your broad opinion of a nuanced political system you have little understanding of. Feels good to hear someone blame me for the deaths of people just by doing the only thing I can do.

        Screenshot_20250122-114359_Firefox

        maybe next time you try to make someone feel like shit you should probably blame them for something they actually did instead of pulling bullshit out of your imagination because it sounds edgy.

        • dx1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Just scrolling through the comments here, people’s takes vary from bad to good, but everyone’s comment is only as long as the text they wrote. Then you jam this huge, not really relevant meme into discussion of an actual life or death issue for millions of people, which is just playing off of a pun on the name “John Goodman”. And your comment isn’t any better. You make a bunch of really off-base, unsubstantiated attacks on the guy you’re replying to. You don’t really seem to understand why they even brought up being Palestinian. You ignore the 100% legitimate criticism that you voted for someone complicit in genocide, brushing it off as “the only thing you could do” (it wasn’t). Then you accuse them of trying to sound “edgy”.

          Buddy, your comment is bleeding “trying to sound edgy”. What is this meme doing here? Where is your sense of responsibility or shame? You are joking about a genocide.

          • dx1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            17 hours ago

            “Bias” makes it sound like there isn’t a completely impartial case to be made against them. Like the most meticulously documented genocide in human history.

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Hey to any Palestinians out there I promise I will never let losers like the above person rest in peace.

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            17 hours ago

            thanks person without much to live for.

            I’m sure the imaginary people you were talking to would be happy! You can finally dedicate your life to something that can truly help them in their time of need.

            how many Palestinians do to plan to save with your brave acts?

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Non American here. Both your parties are genocide and apartheid supporters. Simple as that.

      Yea, one of the two is more than the other. But you got to come to terms with the fact that your country’s bipartisan effect in the region is kinda evil.

      Lol, down vote all you like. I’m just telling the truth.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Everyone here agrees with you, dawg… We just understand our country’s political system enough to know which was the correct choice to mitigate that evil.

        People made the wrong choice.

        • acargitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          You know how we say that Israel is going to continue with apartheid and colonization even if Netanyahu is voted out? And that focusing too much on Netanyahu is sometimes a red herring because Israeli Apartheid is structural and a long term strategic goal of the Israeli establishment? Like, sure Netanyahu accelerates the process and does it shamelessly and publicly, but it’s not as if the process had not been in full swing by both center-left and center-right governments before him, who massively expanded settlements and entrenched the occupation and settlements.

          Same logic applies for the US support of Israeli Apartheid. Your system moves faster and more overtly when controlled by your fascist Right. But I’m not going to pretend that your non-fascist Center is not basically moving in the same direction.

          Just because your political system puts a gun to your heads every four years, doesn’t mean the rest of us have to buy into the same blackmail. (EDIT: we have other blackmails foisted on us by our own assholes thank you very much.)

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Just because your political system puts a gun to your heads every four years, doesn’t mean the rest of us have to buy into the same blackmail.

            Yeah but unfortunately for you, you do. Or even worse, you have no say whatsoever.

        • acargitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Disprove me. Point me official policies enacted by one of the two US parties that materially opposed Israeli Apartheid and the genocide of Palestinians since Oslo. To make sure I don’t move the goalposts by claiming you cherry pick occasional bleeps, make a strong argument by showing me a consistent trend.

          EDIT: added “since Oslo” because we need some start time.

          EDIT2: Here’s what ChatGPT has to say about this. It is obviously not the arbiter of truth, but I guess this is common enough knowledge that it has made to the training of LLMs. Not a proof, but a baseline to beat:

          Since the Oslo Accords in 1993, both major U.S. political parties—the Democrats and the Republicans—have predominantly supported Israel, often refraining from officially opposing its policies toward Palestinians. While individual politicians within these parties have occasionally criticized Israeli actions, a consistent, party-wide trend of enacting official policies that materially oppose what some describe as Israeli apartheid or the genocide of Palestinians is not evident.

          Democratic Party:

          Historically, the Democratic Party has maintained strong support for Israel. However, in recent years, a progressive faction within the party has voiced concerns over Israel’s treatment of Palestinians. Notably, members of “The Squad,” including Representatives Rashida Tlaib and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have condemned Israeli policies. For instance, in October 2023, Tlaib accused Israel of committing genocide, stating, “President Biden, not all America is with you on this one, and you need to wake up and understand. We are literally watching people commit genocide.”

          Despite these individual statements, the broader Democratic Party has not adopted official policies that consistently oppose Israeli actions. The party’s platform continues to support a two-state solution without explicitly condemning Israel’s practices. While some Democrats have urged the administration to take a firmer stance, such as the January 2024 letter from 60 Democratic Congressmembers urging Secretary of State Antony Blinken to condemn the forced displacement of Palestinians, these actions represent internal party debates rather than an official, unified policy shift.

          Republican Party:

          The Republican Party has traditionally exhibited unwavering support for Israel. Under President Donald Trump’s administration, this support intensified, with actions such as recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and moving the U.S. embassy there. The 2024 Republican Party platform reaffirmed the party’s stance to “stand with Israel” and called for the deportation of “pro-Hamas radicals,” indicating a continued strong alliance. WIKIPEDIA

          While there have been isolated critiques—such as Trump’s personal criticisms of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—these do not reflect a broader party policy opposing Israeli actions toward Palestinians. Overall, the Republican Party has not enacted official policies that materially oppose Israel’s treatment of Palestinians.

          Conclusion:

          In summary, neither the Democratic nor the Republican Party has demonstrated a consistent trend of enacting official policies that materially oppose Israel’s actions toward Palestinians since the Oslo Accords. While individual members within these parties have expressed dissenting views, these have not translated into official party-wide policies or actions.

          • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Ugh. Fuck chat gpt. It’s hallucinating and not a legitimate source.

            That being said the uniparty supports capitalism, imperialism, and the unsinkable aircraft carrier known as Israel.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        You do realize the United States didn’t start that war. They’ve done a lot to stabilize the region and they have tried to solve the issue both before and after the war.

        You try and negotiate a deal between Israel and Palestine it’s not an easy task.

          • Fizz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I do not think blame for the wars sits with the person who sold the weapons. There are plenty of people selling bombs. Sell Israel no bombs and they go somewhere else, restrict weapons sales and you keep them as an ally but limit their capability.

        • acargitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          I never said they started the war. I said they support genocide and apartheid (and I should have added occupation). Which they do. You can argue all you like whether their reasons for doing it are good or bad, but the simple fact of the matter is that in a bipartisan way they support Apartheid Israel and its policies for genocide and occupation. That’s just factual.

          • Fizz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I was taking aim at the evil influence to the region. The Americans and Israeli didn’t start the war. They have been working to build ties and alliances to promote regional stability. There are Iranian proxy groups that are destabilizing the region, these people are to blame for the war and destabilizing the region. You cannot support these groups.

            I understand people get hurt in war but negotiations with these groups is going terribly. They have insane demands and are completely delusional. You would never accept a terrorist group doing an attack on your country without repercussions.

            • acargitz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              Malaka, I’m Greek. Better ask what I’d do if my country was occupied, like the Israelis occupy Palestine. My ancestors did worse to the Ottomans after 400 years of occupation and subjugation than what Hamas did to the Israelis after 80.

              We understand what occupation means and what it does to a people. Same reason why the Irish support the Palestinians. And we understand that the “stability” you talk of reeks of Nakba, Apartheid, Occupation and Genocide.

              Edit: toned down the chest thumping

              • Fizz@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Ok what would you do if your country was occupied like Palestine? Would you continue to fight Isreal and risk starting another war knowing full well every single war has been lost catastrophically?

                • acargitz@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  This is not a theoretical question for a Greek person. Here is what we would do:

                  What would you do if your country was occupied?

                  But even that ultimately is besides the point, because we are looking at the whole thing from the outside. For a more sober look, see my responses to LengAways below.

                • Uruanna@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  By calling it “starting a war” (which is a lie) and insisting that it has never gone well, you are implying that they should lie down and let Israel genocide them. Because that’s how that goes.

              • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                14 hours ago

                I’m curious what you suggest the US should do to rectify your criticisms? Do you advocate for the US to take a completely hands-off approach, withdrawing all presence and funding in the area?

                • acargitz@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  The US should listen to Daniel Levy, former negotiator for Israel under Ehud Barak. Look for good interviews and talks online.

    • JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’m here but I’m not United Statesian so I can’t vote in your elections (even though US foreign influence is so aggressive it feels like I should have a say).

      Oh no, I’ve upset some MAGA weirdos. Gonna lose sleep over that.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      https://www.reuters.com/world/us-has-sent-israel-thousands-2000-pound-bombs-since-oct-7-2024-06-28/

      When would the killing stop under biden (or harris who was happy to continue his policies)? Pausing one fucking shipment isn’t the amazing stand for life that you think it is. Sure though, blame it all on Palestine and not the democrats refusing to listen to voters (on many issues, not just this one) during a fucking election. I’m sure if the other pro-genocide candidate got in, we’d all be living in fucking paradise.

      • Zement@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I hope your path of reasoning works out, but I fear Trump would even allow Israel to throw nuclear weapons at Palestine… just for shits and giggles of his fan base to see if Israel really would.

        They will drive Israel to the limit of atrocious crimes they allow … and use this to prosper antisemitic sentiment everywhere else. That’s my prognosis, let’s see who is closer to the truth.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, for one, Harris wouldn’t have had people doing Nazi salutes on stage at her inauguration… But surely that’s unrelated.

        • dx1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          I would put forward the argument that Democrat voters are obsessed with appearances and rhetoric, and completely ignore policy that contradicts the ideals they think of themselves as having. You criticize Elon Musk doing Nazi symbolism, great. Count how many comments you’ve posted about that, and then give me the ratio of those to the number of comments you posted criticizing Biden for sending ~30 billion dollars of arms to a genocide. Because, at the end of the day, the biggest problem with Nazism was that it resulted in genocide. You might remember from school that genocide is LITERALLY THE WORST THING EVER BESIDES COMPLETE NUCLEAR ANNIHILATION OF THE PLANET.

          I’d like to see a minimum of 1:100 on those comments. I get the feeling it’s less.

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          No but she would have had people like Liz Cheney on stage with her, who are just the somewhat more polite precursor to nazis and harbor the same essential bigotry just more disguised in the language of the ruling class.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        the killing stopped under Biden now.

        the killing stopped under Harris now.

        #when will the killing stop under Trump?

        tell us! when?? we were told it would stop of Harris lost!

  • doctortofu@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wow, that’s surely going to both get the price of eggs down AND stop the genocide of Palestinians! How does he do it?

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean there are two ways to stop the genocide. You can stop killing people or you can, how did he put it? “Finish the problem”

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s called a “Final solution” and, yeah, multiple people in the Israeli Government talk about wanting a “Final solution for the Palestinian Problem”.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s probably the rapes that make him feel so young… Or maybe the felonies. I don’t know… There’s a lot to unpack here.

  • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not to beat the dead horse but… Those who said “I won’t vote Democratic because Gaza” were either lying or delusional.

    In 2028 there won’t be any Gaza, what will be the next line?

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      People who still believe you have to choice either between red and blue are delusional.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That’s just self-indugent tribalist scapegoating using an argument which is circular and self-disproving.

      • If there were too few people who cared about the Israeli Genocide enough for it to affect the vote, which is would justify the decision of the Democrat leadership to not do anything meaningful to agree with the demands of those voters (Biden pausing his own decision of sending 2000lb bombs is very much a “I’m saving you from myself” moment), then you can’t really blame those few people for the Democrat loss since there were not enought of them to make a difference and something else made the Democracts lose, so the fault is in the strategy followed by the Democrat leadership on other subjects.
      • If on the other hand there were so many people who cared about the Israeli Genocide enough for it to result in the Democrats losing the vote, why did the Democrat candidates not go after that vote? Again, the blame is down to the choices of the Democrat leadership: it’s always easier to change what a handfull of people do than to change what millions do, so for the handful of people in the Democrat Party leadership to change their position with regards to supporting Israeli in its Genocide would be far more logical to expect in that scenario than for such a large slice of the electorate - millions of voters - to change their position instead. Even if one thinks “our leader’s position is more important than that of millions of people so it’s the millions who have to change their positions, not our leader” (a bootlicker’s mindset, BTW), it’s still incredibly stupid to go with “we’re going to convince millions to change their position rather than just that one guy” as a strategy so the blame still rests with those who chose to go with it.

      All I see here and now is people making a pseudo-“argument” that is entirelly reliant on the axiom that “the boss is always right” to manage to somehow blame millions for something which the “the boss” could have (per the part of that very same pseudo-“argument” which claims it was the people who were against the Israeli Genocide that sawyed the vote) easilly avoided by just meaningufully changing his position on just that one subject. That presumption that the leaders are blameless and it’s the peons who are to blame for not being willing to follow the leaders no mater what they were doing, is a 100% subservient mindset.

      If you’re going to assign blame for Trump, look at the handful of people in the Democrat Party who chose to do things in such a way that the results was that millions of their own electorate chose not to vote for them, thus delivering the election to Trump.

      • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sorry, didn’t pass the second line because you failed to understand what I say.

        I’m not saying Biden is good for Gaza. I’m saying if your concern is Gaza, Trump is not better. So for a meaningless virtue signaling, everything else is worse.

    • splinter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is the tragic truth.

      The most frustrating part about it is that withholding votes was framed as a principled position. And I’m sorry, but that’s asinine. How many of those people who declared that they wouldn’t vote for the democratic ticket because of their action/inaction on Gaza actually did anything more than posting rants on social media? How many raised funds for aid? How many organized rallies, protests, or educational outreach? How many even so much as contacted their representatives?

      It is either naivety or complacency to believe that national policy should change just because you and your friends sent around some memes. And it is callous indifference to base your vote on a single issue and then claim that you’re inhabiting the moral high ground.

      If you yell into the void, you shouldn’t expect a response. And if you believe in an issue, either take action or acknowledge that it would be staggeringly arrogant to expect other people to put in work that you yourself won’t do.

      • clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        The American non-Republican voters were played like a fiddle. Long live Tik Tok who fed the indignation and enabled Trump’s victory!

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, but when do they ever stop at just one group? When the Nazis started running low on Jews to scapegoat, they expanded their operation to include gays, gypsies, handicapped…etc.

    • LePoisson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think most of them were state sponsored psyops or really shit trolls. I don’t think most actual real marginally rational thinking people would have such a dumb af take.

      • peregrin5@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Trump being elected is enough proof for me to realize most people in our country have dumb af takes.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        You would think, and yet they’re still around parrotting the same narrative. Hell, there’s at least one in the comments of this very post.

        Assuming that anyone with a contrary opinion, no matter how ridiculous you might feel it is, is being disingenuous is an easy way to underestimate them.

        • dx1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I don’t know about you, but I don’t “parrot”. Someone can be capable of thorough independent thought and be unwilling to support politicians complicit in/actively committing genocide. Crazy, I know.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t think most Americans care enough about Gaza for it to affect their vote (or for it to cause them to choose not to vote). Some, certainly, but not enough to have made a difference. This was about groceries being expensive.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          It was a combined effort to suppress voter turnout. Provide every possible reason to tap into that bernie bro “the democrats deserve to lose because they betrayed me” mindset.

            • Zorque@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              The problem being that means too many people don’t show up, and only the fanatics get a say. And they have a lot more than us.

              • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                That’s exactly my point. People should go and vote against fascism, but apparently they won’t.

                And Harris wasn’t inspiring enough to get them out to vote for her instead of just against him.

                • Zorque@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Your point seemed to be “She sucks, maybe not as much as the other guy, but still sucks”, which is not exactly inspiring in and of itself. maybe you should do less to try and discredit the currently most viable defense we have against people like Trump.

                  You have serious problems if you needs additional inspiration beyond literal fascism.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            That fake “Bernie bro” mindset, you mean. No genuine Bernie bro failed to vote (D) in the general, by definition, because that’s what Bernie himself recommended.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        As if you need any additional evidence how .ml and their spinoffs are funded

        • dx1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          ^ I remember this dude was on the last post like this too. I think that “they’ve been real quiet since the election” post in PoliticalMemes that got me banned from the sub.

  • HANN@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Both Trump and Harris were pro Israel. Why are third party voters getting gaslighted for Trump’s actions. I didn’t vote for him. And Harris would have been more of the same. Worse/better doesn’t matter. Both backed Israel and sending weapons.

    • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Living in a world without nuance would mean experiencing life in a stark, black-and-white manner. Every situation, person, and idea is categorized as purely good or bad, leaving no room for complexity, shades of meaning, or understanding of different perspectives; A world where everything is simplified to extremes, leading to misinterpretations and a difficulty navigating more complex situations and interpersonal relationships. If worse/better doesn’t matter, there can be no difference between killing 1,000 people or killing 100,000 people.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Both of them are pro-Israel, but only one of them is sending Israel 2,000 lbs bombs. How can you not see that that is flatly worse?

      • lemmingthelemmers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        14 hours ago

        That’s true.

        And only one of them has overseen the wholesale destruction of Gaza by originally supplying thousands of 2,000 lb bombs plus BILLIONS of DOLLARS of other weapons that were used in the genocide.

        And only one has negotiated a ceasefire.

        Which one of those two is flatly worse?

  • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Whoa whoa “Genocide Joe” where did you come from where did you go, where did you come from “Genocide Joe.”

    Crickets

    • Aabbcc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      He was entirely unfit to hold office and ruined the democrats chance of winning the election

      Next question

  • FolknForage@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am just here waiting for the “Free Palestine” folks to show us the way with some real radical activism.

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Of those of us that voted, whether Harris, Stein, De la Cruz, West, etc. - everyone we voted for lost. The candidate you voted for was also complicit in genocide, whereas ours wasn’t. We failed as a collective. If we could take every single one of those votes, and coordinate them towards one candidate, the best scenario would NOT be Harris, because she’s a fucking lying psychopath. That’s not even radical, this is civics 101 - you have a fascist movement you want to defeat, organize, find the best path, follow the best path, in unison. Not some middling ass piece of shit war criminal that the television told you was the top choice.

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    I can’t find the will to make a leopards/faces joke about this. This is exactly what we told people who wouldn’t vote for Harris because of “gEnOcIdE jOe” bullshit.

    Biden made real efforts to prevent the Israeli government from committing genocide. They failed, but they tried. Now we’ve got an absolute monster in charge who is going to outright empower the genocide.

    If you voted for Trump, voted for a third party, or refused to vote… FUCK YOU. You own this.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      Biden made real efforts to prevent the Israeli government from committing genocide.

      Okay I don’t have the energy to refute to this stuff anymore, so lemme just ask: Do you seriously believe the president of the united states, the single largest benefactor of Israeli regional hegemony, doesn’t have the ability to enforce its own laws and prevent violations of international law by its protectorate?

      • kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s a much, much more complicated situation than you’re presenting. Biden was trying to thread the needle between “deny Israel weaponry” (end result: Opportunistic invasion by Israel’s neighbors) and “give Netanyahu all the weapons he wants” (end result: what we’re about to see with these gigantic, city-block-destroying bombs).

        How would you do it?

        • Jack@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Biden was trying not to die in office, he was clearly incapable of tying his shoe laces, let alone stop any conflict.

          You do not live in democracy, go cry about how trump ruined your life while oligarchs are controlling your whole state.

          How can you be so blind?

          • dx1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            You can tell these people aren’t paying ANY attention. Still talking about “Trump is going to destroy Gaza”. Gaza is fucking destroyed. It’s a pile of smoldering concrete and asbestos rubble with the bones of women and children in splinters beneath it.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh, it’s the “but what about the Jews” argument. You do realize Israel’s whole problem with its neighbors is their treatment of Palestinians, right? If Israel can’t stop its apartheid and make real.peace with their neighbors then they deserve to get invaded. Their apartheid state isn’t worth more than the at least 200 thousand Palestinians who died in Israel’s genocide. I’ll also point out that Israel has the most advanced military in the region, so the idea that Israel can’t resist an invasion is wrong.

          • kescusay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Do you think Israel should be destroyed?

            Edit: Interesting. No one is willing to say “no.”

            Here’s the thing: What Joe Biden tried (and yes, failed, because Netanyahu is a corrupt madman) to do was simultaneously support Israel’s right to exist and defend itself, and do what he could to minimize damage to Gaza.

            Now we have a “president” who will gleefully help Netanyahu destroy Gaza entirely and take over the land. You’ve gone from someone whose friendship to Palestine was tepid to someone who actively wants it destroyed.

            This isn’t an upgrade.

            • dx1@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              Do you think Israel should be destroyed?

              You types always phrase it “destroyed”. What does that mean? Should the state dissolve? Yes. Should it be bombed with a nuke? No. Should there be equality in the region? Yes. Radical take I know.

              Do you understand the difference between an imaginary social structure ending, and millions of people being killed? Like, if a company goes bankrupt and dissolves, does that mean all its employees are killed, in your mind? Or are we just mindlessly going with the racist imperial narrative of “if we don’t genocide them they’ll genocide us the first chance they get”?

              do was simultaneously support Israel’s right to exist and defend itself, and do what he could to minimize damage to Gaza.

              Here’s the actual thing. This was the PR line ran by the Biden administration as they violated domestic and international law to send billions of dollars in arms to a genocide. There is no legal “right to exist” under international law, for any state. There is a “right to self-defense” but that right doesn’t exist in the context of an illegal military occupation (the occupation of Palestine) - the “right” in that scenario is the right of the occupied people to resist. That’s not a hypothetical “right”, that’s an enshrined legal right under international law. The same way that if Canada or Russia or whoever invaded the U.S. and stationed troops for 57 years, we’d have a right to take up arms against them. The equivalent in that situation, for the “right” that you think exists, would be the “right” of the invading Canadians to mass murder American civilians based on the (unsubstantiated) rationale that militants are hiding underneath churches, hospitals, elementary schools, water treatment plants, etc. Also known as “no holds barred genocide”.

              The Biden administration knows this. Biden knows it, Blinken knows it, Matt Miller knows it, Kamala Harris knows it, Vedant Patel knows it, Linda Thomas Greenfield knows it. This is a case of “they are incentivized to forget it”. Also known as “the lowest depths of human evil”. The fact that YOU haven’t noticed this is the entire problem - you, and the other Democrats, and the Republicans all. To us, you are hardly different - the Republicans just a little more stupid.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah, why not? Again, apartheid states don’t deserve to exist. Also I’ll note that this is not the same as “should Israelis be all mercilessly slaughtered”, that’s a different question with a different answer.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Its not complicated at all when multiple international human rights organizations credibly found Isreal was committing war crimes and the US already has a law preventing the sale of arms to nation’s credibly accused of war crimes. Biden was the cheif executive all he had to do was execute a law that was already on the books. Neither the SC nor Congress would have had any say.

          Stop carrying water for genocide financiers who had every opportunity to do something different.

          • kescusay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s not an answer, and I’m not “carrying water for genocide financiers.” I never once excused or denied Israel’s behavior. Netanyahu responded to a horrendous terrorist attack by turning the dials on “horrendous” and “terror” up to 11. He’s a monster and a war criminal and should spend the rest of his life in prison.

            Now then, how would you do it? Put yourself in the president’s shoes. You need to come up with a solution that allows Israel to continue to exist and not be destroyed by, say, Iran… AND allows the Palestinians to survive. Cut off all weapons, goodbye Israel. Give Israel a blank check, goodbye Palestine. What do you try to do?

            • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I gave you the solution, it is an answer. Follow the law as written, Israel is not above the law. You keep jumping through hoops to say we can’t follow the law and then claim you don’t carry water for them? Fuck all the way out of here with that cognitive dissonance, you’re practically hasbara.

      • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well, thankfully the alternative is going to stop Israel on it’s tracks and… Oh wait a minute…

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is exactly what we told people who wouldn’t vote for Harris because of “gEnOcIdE jOe” bullshit.

      What that things would continue on as they have been for well over a year now? Where is the “leopards ate my face” aspect of this?

      Biden made real efforts to prevent the Israeli government from committing genocide. They failed, but they tried.

      What efforts were those? Strongly worded phone calls and “red lines” that were constantly crossed and redrawn, while simultaneously standing alone in blocking UN and NATO resolutions against Israel?

      who is going to outright empower the genocide.

      Can you explain how a genocide that we’ve been actively supporting for the past 15 months is now being “empowered?”

      • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        The article is literally stating that Trump is giving the green light to giving Israel more powerful bombs to genocide with, and also to give Israeli West Bank occupiers their access to US financial resources again.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The occupiers are the state of Israel. Biden had some very limited sanctions against specific extremists who weren’t also Americans, but no one in their right mind thought that was somehow stopping the occupation.

          • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            The occupiers are the state of Israel.

            Yes, that what I said, though I can see how the ordering of my words could be ambiguous.

            Biden had some very limited sanctions

            And Trump is removing them. Therefor Trump is, in an objective and literal sense, empowering those people subjected to those sanctions by removing sanctions that Biden had put in place.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Those sanctions didn’t actually do anything about the occupation. It’d be like sanctioning some random ultra-Z Russians rather than their leadership or institutions and acting like it’s curbing the occupation of Crimea. A few specific Israelis couldn’t bank with the United States, but they can just route through American-Israelis in their ranks instead. Them specifically banking wasn’t in any way important to the occupation.

              Lifting the sanctions by Trump is bad, but more on the symbolism than the impact.

              • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Trump could have said hey this sanction isn’t working, we need to strengthen it so that it does. But he instead said get rid of this sanction entirely. I get that you’re saying “well it didn’t really work and they had access to it anyway.” I do. But by your own account they had to go through extra steps to get it and now they don’t. That’s empowering. Even if just in the psychological sense that they now get to think “hey Trump is doing things to make it easier for me to keep occupying this land.” They now know that Trump is aiding them, so that gives them a greater sense of purpose and power to continue. And now they get more of the bigger bombs with which to do it.

                • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  This is just such a minimal impact it’s hard to get worked up about it. It’s wrong and it’s bad and it’s worse, but we have not lost a force for good in losing Bidenism. Bidenism with respect to Israel was evil. And Trump is eviler, but on this issue, there’s really not much worse it can get. On many many other issues Trump is incomparably worse, but no one should pretend Biden was in any way a bulwark against genocide and occupation.

                  This very story demonstrates it. In a raft of reversing Biden policies, the only things he could do for Israel was unrestricting a single bomb and removing some token sanctions. That’s the sum of Biden’s efforts to restrain Israel.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          He’s approving one shipment (Israel has been using 2000 pound bombs since October 7th and I haven’t heard anything about them stopping after that shipment was paused) and lifting sanctions on the four West Bank settlers Biden had sanctioned. This will only hurt Palestinians about as much as the original moves by Biden had helped them, which is to say: not at all.

          • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            From Oct 7 2023 to Jun 28 2024 (the date of the reuters article that is being posted) we had shipped thousands of those bombs. We paused a shipment in May of 2024 (stated in that reuters articale), and here’s an article from July of 2024 saying we still had not shipped any of them

            https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-resume-shipping-500-pound-bombs-israel-us-official-says-2024-07-10/

            And I’ve found nothing indicating we have sent any more 2k pound bombs since May of 2024. So if we had, please provide a source reporting it.

            Perhaps we should try to agree on what empowering means, though:

            Trump’s actions are empowering the genocide because they are clearly supportive of both Israel’s bombing and occupation.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              And I’ve found nothing indicating we have sent any more 2k pound bombs since May of 2024. So if we had, please provide a source reporting it.

              Apparently there haven’t been any shipments since may, so my bad there.

              Trump’s actions are empowering the genocide because they are clearly supportive of both Israel’s bombing and occupation.

              I mean the problem is that this doesn’t matter in the grand scheme of things. You either do things or you don’t, things like empowering or slamming or come to Jesus moments are all rhetoric and rhetoric only matters when it starts affecting the real world. We’ll have to see if the ceasefire holds; if it does then it makes sense (in US foreign policy terms, I of course hate it) for Trump to continue shipments, if not then we can start talking about leopards eating faces. The settler sanctions had zero effect on the real world, so they don’t matter no matter how “empowering” lifting them may be.

          • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            Your link is published in June of 2024 and states:

            The Biden administration has paused one shipment of the 2,000-pound bomb, citing concern over the impact it could have in densely populated areas in Gaza, but U.S. officials insist that all other arms deliveries continue as normal. One 2,000-pound bomb can rip through thick concrete and metal, creating a wide blast radius.

            Here’s a link from July of 2024

            https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-resume-shipping-500-pound-bombs-israel-us-official-says-2024-07-10/

            The U.S. in May paused a shipment of 2,000-pound and 500-pound bombs due to concern over the impact they could have in Gaza

            I can’t find anything saying we resumed shipment of 2,000 pound bombs in the remainder of 2024. So it seems to be true Trump is now reversing Biden’s [since May 2024] policy of withholding these bombs.

            • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              It also states that Biden sent over ten thousand 2,000lb bombs before pausing that single shipment. I don’t understand why you’re trying to split hairs here as if it makes any difference (irrespective of the 500lb bombs continuing to be shipped, the $20 billion shipment of fighter jets, bombs, and missles in August, and the $8 billion weapons shipment he approved two weeks ago).

              • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I don’t understand why you’re trying to split hairs here as if it makes any difference

                Because this comment thread is about whether Trump’s actions are empowering the Israelis. It’s apparent to me that most people are using a different definition of empowering than I am.

                Even though these actions don’t have a large practical impact on their military capability, or financial means, it does send the message that Trump isn’t interested in placing even performative restraint on Israel. Thus, he is empowering them to do even more.

                • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Well if we’re splitting hairs, how does the ceasefire fall into your definition of empowering the Israelis? That’s not something we’ve seen at any point in the past 15 months of slaughter.

                  I don’t think Trump really deserves credit for it, but Biden surely doesn’t. Not only did he allow them to cross red line after red line while supplying them with money and weapons the entire time, but he also blocked numerous UN resolutions on the matter while standing alone with Israel.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Can you explain how a genocide that we’ve been actively supporting for the past 15 months is now being “empowered?”

        It’s right there in the headline. We’re sending 2,000lb bombs that weren’t being sent before.

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Trump appears to have pushed Netanyahu to agree to a ceasefire, which Biden failed to do. I wouldn’t be surprised if the delivery of these bombs was part of the backroom deal between Trump and Netanyahu which led to the ceasefire.

      I don’t know what will happen after this ceasefire expires, but until then it’s a little early for those who criticized Biden’s policy on Israel to criticize Trump’s.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        I wouldn’t be surprised if the delivery of these bombs was part of the backroom deal between Trump and Netanyahu which led to the ceasefire.

        I can’t deny that when seeing the news and timing my first thought was of Reagan and the Iran hostage crisis.

        • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t think this is the same thing unless Trump told Netanyahu to delay the ceasefire, and I haven’t heard anyone claim that he did.

      • kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        No it fucking isn’t, what with Israel set to receive 2,000 pound bombs that can level a city block.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I love how now you’re arguing that supplying weapons to Israel is a grave sin. How do you feel about supplying 500 pound bombs that can simply level a building?

      • kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        This article is literally about one of Biden’s efforts to rein in the violence. He did try. Now go ahead and excuse Trump freeing up 2,000-pound bombs for Israel, and how that’s better for Palestine than it would be if Harris had won. Good luck.

        • small44@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          He also bypassed congress twice to give billions of aid to Israel. Nobody is excusing trump freeing 2000 pound of bomb to Israel

        • distantsounds@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          “We tried nothing and we’re all out of ideas” energy. It’s almost if Palestine was doomed either way. Heck of a lot cheaper to not send bombs to Israel

          • kescusay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            2 days ago

            Lying about Biden trying “nothing” doesn’t make it OK that you carried water for Trump.

            • distantsounds@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              2 days ago

              Now that is a lie, anyone who thinks Biden actually tried to stop the genocide is either not paying attention or flat out lying. Not everyone who opposes aiding an active genocide carried water for trump. Believe it or not you can be vocal about being against trump and genocide

              • electricyarn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                This is a very simple trolley problem. Do nothing and the Trump train runs over a lot more people. Vote fore Biden and a lot less folks will day. Arguing for the Trump trolley (which you are doing) is foolish.

                • Aqarius@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  The setup is correct, but calling the problem “very simple” just means you don’t understand the trolley problem.

                • distantsounds@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  If you think that what I said was in support of trump, you are part of the reason trump is in office again. There is no trolley; there be only genocide or we’re sorry still genocide

      • yuknowhokat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Okay, so even if Biden didn’t try what good did voting for Trump or not voting at all due for our country and or Israel?

        • distantsounds@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          What? Biden didn’t try. You don’t have to vote for trump or not vote at all, to understand that.

  • blakenong@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hehe. As planned. Thanks to people who refused to vote for Kamala. Leopards don’t see political parties, all faces taste the same.

      • blakenong@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        What’s changed is all hope for cancelling weapons to Israel is gone. Kamala, while certainly not a great option, could at least be pressured.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          You were foolish to have hope in the first place because if tens of thousands of innocent children getting blown into little pieces wasn’t enough to stop weapon sales, nothing is. Thinking that Harris “could be pressured” is just magical thinking because she, nor Biden, had any intention of stopping their aid to Israel to the point that they were willing to hand over control to the Republicans rather than even saying anything negative about Israel’s conduct and their participation in it.

          • blakenong@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Well, you’re not wrong. But Trump will make things over there (and locally) significantly worse in the long run. Yes, worse than it is now. All the while talking about progress, and how much better things are.

            In the end, all the land will be handed over to Israel, and developers will turn it into a resort town. Anyone left alive will be a servant to the wealthy.

            And my hope was “could be pressured” as opposed to “no chance in hell.” We cut our nose of to spite our face.

            • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              I didn’t say “everything is hopeless” I said that Biden, Harris, and Trump were never going to do anything but aid in this genocide.

              • electricyarn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                “You were foolish to have hope in the first place”

                This is the trolley problem. Harris was the path of less suffering, simple as that.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      A slightly bigger bomb won’t change anything materially on the ground in Gaza. The only significant change recently has been a cease fire. Whether it will hold or not is as yet unknown. But at least so far, Trump has somehow actually managed to be better on Gaza than Biden. Trump has shown a willingness to actually use the carrots and sticks of US foreign policy to produce outcomes. Biden offered unconditional support to Israel, while Trump seems to have forced them to come to the peace table by threatening to withhold support. In other words, Trump did what Biden’s base had been begging him to do for a year.

      It’s possible all this falls apart. And it is possible that Trump will prove far worse, for example by allowing an annexation of the West Bank. But so far at least, Trump has actually been a lot better for the Palestinians than Biden. Biden and Harris fundamentally do not accept that Israel should ever be held accountable for anything.

      I don’t think Trump did the cease fire out of moral concerns; I’m sure it was purely self-serving on his part. But he was actually willing to use the US’s various carrots and sticks to force through a cease fire agreement. That is something Biden never had the balls to do.

      • Glasgow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        He sold the West Bank for 100m to Adelson. The genocide won’t stop their focus is just shifting temporarily. It’s not a win, Biden could’ve got them to agree on those terms too. Just like he could’ve ended the Ukraine war if he just told Ukraine to give up and concede a chunk of land.

      • blakenong@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Trump didn’t do anything. He has no control over Israel. He did nothing for this cease fire. I’m sure he would love to take credit one day and not the next.

        • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          [CITATION NEEDED]

          He’s had people involved in backroom negotiations for months. Yes, it is a dirty tactic. This has a lot of undertones of Reagan’s deal with the Iranians. He didn’t have great intentions in negotiating a ceasefire, but he did manage to do it. And Trump has shown a willingness in the past to hold US military aid as a stick to change the behavior of allies. It’s reasonable to think he did the same thing here.

          The US DOES have substantial control over Israel. Reagan for instance dramatically affected Israel’s behavior by withholding weapons. Biden was more permissive of Israel than Reagan was.

          • blakenong@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            That is certainly possible, but any involvement from him would have been because he wanted to gain personal wealth or power. I’m sure you know this, but people need to remember that anything that Trump is doing to hold Israel in check has nothing to do with helping Gaza or the Palestinians. He doesn’t care. I do think that he’s very interested in developing on that land. If you recall, a while back there was something going around about Jared Kushner being involved with development in Gaza. I’m not sure what came of that and I don’t remember the exact details.