

Are you taking about Formosa or the Republic of China?
Are you taking about Formosa or the Republic of China?
This is fine, but I prefer it when you take the pie, put it into a food processor, compress it into a log and then slice it to serve on sandwich bread. Serving it just sliced out of the pie is lazy.
Eric Adams was flexing his bootlicking muscle.
Or maybe we just tie some horses on the thing.
That’s just clay. They pinched the wheels from a ball of clay. That’s why the taper is so pronounced.
The man with the action packed expense account.
You need to have standing, which if the only impact is Congress’s budget then only Congress does.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flast_v._Cohen for establishment clause standing by regular taxpayers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hein_v._Freedom_From_Religion_Foundation for the court throwing that out for the executive. They’d likely throw the whole thing out now.
Assyria did it before the Romans. They had a general resettlement policy that moved people into mesopotamia. Unless you were talking about Assyria and the Romans as the two.
Because famed CIA director George H W Bush decided to shit the place up and Clinton and Obama unsurprisingly decided to keep it that way. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Transition_Initiatives
25 per hundred. 25/100. 25 per centum.
They’ve got horns and they sound like a broken synthesizer.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CVwrAcBRVYE https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4FZKMvHE8fI
Whoever did it had qualified immunity, without a doubt. Better off not resisting there.
I guess I can’t separate it from a religious program because fundamentally the ethics of it are theistic and not humanistic. They’re handed down morals that come from a higher moral power. When you get into esoteric ethical debates with Christian apologists, and they describe atheists as being incapable of being moral, that’s what they mean. They believe morals must come from something greater than ourselves and cannot come from a human source.
To put it another way, AA is remarkably similar to Aristotle’s virtue ethics which was used by Aquinas to describe the origins of morality. Similar to AA’s higher power, Aristotle derived the moral authority for virtue ethics from the “prime mover.” Same concept, in essence.
This is your posting on kratom.
Nah, those numbers aren’t a bubble burst. Less than 20 percent is just them saying “well China developed one while being blocked from Western chips, so you Western chipmakers obviously aren’t important.” The real assumptions that created the bubble are still there.
I challenge you to stay hydrated while drinking coffee with every meal and a whole bottle of wine.
Sure, from their perspective it’s an echo chamber for tulip lovers. In the end it’s a subjective pejorative, not necessarily a hard descriptive.
Key point is that while ethanol can easily be turned into triglycerides, it’s not so easy to do gluconeogenesis with it. Since you can’t turn it all into glucose, you can’t refill your glycogen stores with it. Every gram of glycogen comes with 3 grams of water. You’ll end up losing a lot of water weight in a few days even if you’re in a calorie excess because of the relatively low carbohydrate profile of this diet. If you drink enough wine, the sugar from the wine will allow you to rebuild your glycogen stores so that’s why this diet limits it to a bottle.
You’re getting downvoted but you ain’t wrong.