A Delaware animal shelter is working to find new homes for thousands of chicks that were left abandoned in a U.S. Postal Service truck for three days.

Delaware’s Department of Agriculture said it received a call earlier this month from USPS saying the Postal Service had an “undeliverable box of baby birds.” About 12,000 chicks had been shipped from the Pennsylvania-based Freedom Ranger Hatchery to farms across the country.

State agricultural officials say that when they found the chicks at a USPS distribution center in Delaware, around 4,000 were dead.

    • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah it’s the PETA approach of “let’s protect these animals by euthanizing them so they can’t later be harmed.”

      • Jack@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Factory farming for the vast majority of chickens, is life-long enslavement in torturous conditions.

        Hundreds of billions of non-aquatic animals are enslaved by factory farmers every year.

        Trillions of fish are enslaved in factory farms every single year.

        • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          What about all the hundreds of billions of plant-based lifeforms enslaved on factory farms every year before being culled? Why aren’t you concerned about them too?

          • Applejuicy@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            If you are genuinely interested in the vegan position, I’d happily answer (or you could have used a search engine and gotten millions of answers). Something tells me you’re not being genuine in your motivation.

            In short: there is no sentience and thus, no capacity for suffering inside plants as far as we know based on scientific consensus. Animals do have this. Hence why I care about taking a knife to an animals throat and slicing it, and not about chopping a carrot.

            Even if you believe for whatever bum fuck spiritualist reason that plants can suffer, you can minimize plant usage by going vegan. Keeping all those farm animals alive requires (plantbased) feed, so cutting out the middle man reduces the number of plants wasted.

            • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              you can minimize plant usage by going vegan.

              no, you can’t. the industry doesn’t change it’s growth due to vegans.

                • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  vegans have been around since the 1940s, and my guess is there are more now than ever, but the meat industry grows year-over-year every year. being vegan doesn’t decrease the amount of meat dairy or eggs produced. it certainly doesn’t reduce the amount of vegetables grown.

            • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              there is no sentience and thus, no capacity for suffering inside plants

              this can’t be proven

              • Applejuicy@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Should we, according to you, grant the same amount of ethical consideration to a tomato as to a cat/pig/bird/etc? Do you actually believe there is a sentient being in a plant, or a rock for that matter?

                Our best scientific understanding is that a CNS is essential for sentience, and there is no serious evidence support plant sentience. You can play the philospher and argue this, but then technically you can’t prove human sentience outside your own (if that). Should we go kill humans?

                Anyway. I see you’re not serious in this conversation and are just trolling. Have a good one.

                • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Anyway. I see you’re not serious in this conversation and are just trolling. Have a good one.

                  this is an ad hominem and a thought terminating cliche. what i’m saying is true. your fallacious rhetoric doesn’t change that.

                • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Our best scientific understanding is that a CNS is essential for sentience

                  i think what you mean is that sentience has only been substantiated in organisms with a cns.

                • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Do you actually believe there is a sentient being in a plant, or a rock for that matter?

                  i never said that. what i said is that you can’t prove there isn’t.

                • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Should we, according to you, grant the same amount of ethical consideration to a tomato as to a cat/pig/bird/etc?

                  i don’t know what you mean by ethical consideration.