• paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I think he could make a compelling argument justifying it if Trump were to win the election, a sort of Julius Caesar part deux. I think you could make the case that American democracy as we know it would end if Trump were elected president and that in order to protect democracy, his assassination was needed. However, in doing so, American democracy as we know it would still end because Biden would be opening the door to domestic political assassination being in president’s tool belt, so it’s kind of a catch-22. We’re damned if we do, damned if we don’t. So really, the only thing that will “save” democracy is if people vote for Harris, that’s where we’re at as a country. I’d love to vote third party, I actually didn’t care much for Harris before Biden dropped out, but the stakes are really too high this election to consider anything else.

    • Don_Dickle@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      But would he be sitting as a defendant like trump was during his shit? Or could he just ignore it and just not show up?

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You say this as if the next Republican president won’t do this.

      The best way to fix this is with Biden being the sacrificial lamb.

      Basically he executes Trump via executive order, executes the conservative justices, all standing Republicans in the Senate. Then get enough states to pass referendums for a constitutional convention.

      Do the overhaul of the constitution, solidifying human rights, separation of church from state, making fascism treason, make billionaires illegal, and, for kicks, universal healthcare.

      Hey, don’t wake me up from this dream, okay?

  • Grebes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You could argue that his oath of office requires it. But yes the Supreme Court only meant this power to be used by people they approve of

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Nah, because he’s a Democrat. SCOTUS would rule that was a violation of his presidential duties… they left that ruling incredibly vague so that they can be the authority.

  • andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    He could not be prosecuted for it, but my understanding is that the people who killed Trump could be prosecuted because it’s still a crime (it’s just that Biden can’t prosecuted for it)

      • andrewta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        45 minutes ago

        Technically he could but then that was always a possibility of any federal crime going back to the inception of the US

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    they left it to ‘congress’ to decide what is and isnt an official act. so, congress being run by a bunch of conservative morons would indict biden but let trump walk for the exact same behaviors.

      • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I kind of don’t want to know, because the real answer would probably be terrifying.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          CEOs, too.

          Also school teachers. Pastors. Cops.

          Let’s add librarians for contrast.

          • Tujio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I have met many, many school teachers in my adult life and the vast majority of them are lovely people. There has only been one who I’d describe as a psychopath.

            Alcoholics? Absolutely. It’s a toss-up between teachers, lawyers and nurses for the hardest-drinking group of motherfuckers I’ve ever known.

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              it’s a profession that gives a position of authority over others; and specifically over people who are quite vulnerable.

              You may not have met them, but there are teachers that are psychopaths. Many of those teachers who are also psychopaths might also come off as quite lovely, too.

              • Organichedgehog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                I feel like maybe you don’t know any teachers. The fact that you lumped them in with politicians, ceos, and police is, quite frankly, batshit insane