An Oklahoma man who was doing target practice in his backyard on Christmas is believed to have shot and killed an elderly woman a few blocks from his home, authorities said.

Cody Wayne Adams, 33, has been charged with first-degree manslaughter in connection with the deadly shooting, court filings show.

The victim was on a covered front porch with family members at a residence in Comanche when she was shot Thursday afternoon, according to the probable cause affidavit. She was holding a baby in her left arm while seated on a love seat when she was struck in her right upper arm, according to the affidavit. The bullet then entered her chest cavity, it said.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    The dumbfuck Adams is one of many reasons why the USA needs stricter gun control. I wonder if the worthless POS is a Charlie Kirk supporter.

  • Cloudstash@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “I’m a responsible gun owner, i have owned guns since the dawn of light” - Proceeds to 360 no-scope the neighbor.

    Well, no, the average gun owner in USA is not a responsible gun owner.

  • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    There’s a bullet hole in the flashing under my second floor gutters, facing the street. Doesn’t look like it came from nearby, like it’s not slanted down toward the street or anything. No idea how long it’s been there, but I found it a few years ago when cleaning the gutters. Bullet might still be lodged in there.

    It’s genuinely wild to me that people just fire this shit off willy-nilly.

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      13 hours ago

      My wife worked with someone that didn’t know that bullets come down after you shoot them in the air. People are fucking stupid.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      While in military school after boot camp, I was stuck in the barracks because our Chief was extremely strict about letting us use our evening time how we’d like. While mopping the same spot for the 4th hour, I get a call from my wife advising that she’s really scared. A gun had just discharged from the neighbors house, went through our wall, got lodged in our dresser about 2” from my 1.5 year old daughter’s leg. I went to my chief and other instructors, asking to be let out so I can comfort my family. They said no, there’s nothing I can do if I leave and my family can drive to a motel if they feel unsafe.

    • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It’s genuinely wild to me that Americans let just anyone have the capability to do that.

      • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I agree, frankly. I am expert qualified (former military), and inherited firearms when my mom died. I don’t have any firearms currently, as I sold those off (very very old farm weapons; we were on a farmette) nor do I ever intend to get more. All that training, and I’m still not comfortable owning something that is designed specifically to kill something.

        That is to say you can hypothetically do nothing, and still end up with firearms, which is a really big problem. Zero background check on inheritance…

      • innermachine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        14 hours ago

        If you aren’t absolutely chicken shit it isn’t a problem. Idk I think u should have to get a licence to own a firearm, maybe if you can’t figure out bullet-go-far you can’t fucking own a gun

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Yup, that’s why if you’re going to practice, do so on a range and always consider: what the hell is BEHIND/AROUND my target?

    JFC for a nation as obsessed with firearms as the United States, the level of firearms safety knowledge is shockingly low.

    • Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      People in my neck of the woods talk about fire arms the way I talk about video games or TV shows. They sound like recreation rather than self defense. I don’t know if knowledge is the only factor; a sense of seriousness about firearms seems to be lacking.

      • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        To be fair if guns were legal in my area I’d totally have one for fun. They look like a ton of fun. Probably best I’m not allowed one

    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Lol, ranges aren’t necessarily any better. Hopefully they have someone enforcing safety rules, but there are a great deal of them that are in suburban areas, and even the rural ones can be within striking range of homes.

  • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    In civilized parts of the world, it is illegal to discharge a firearm in an urban area or within X metres of an occupied building etc.

    In the USA people shoot in their suburban backyard.

    • Faildini@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      14 hours ago

      For what it’s worth, it’s illegal in the USA too. Obviously that didn’t stop this moron.

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I can’t think of a place I’ve lived where discharge of firearms within city limits was not illegal. This moron probably didn’t care.

  • wuffah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    If only that baby were armed, it could have returned fire and everything would have been okay. More guns is the solution!

    • SoloCritical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It’s insane to me how many people think that taking guns away will actually increase the violence… like the people that would normally shoot up a place would suddenly become experts at building bombs and take out WAY more people… when the reality is that those people would probably be more likely to blow themselves up trying to build a bomb… guns are so simple to kill with, a toddler could do it. Building a bomb or something equivalent is much harder than pulling a trigger.

      • If the polive was actually useful, then maybe getting rid of guns could be a good thing.

        But as an Asian American. I know about the Korean Americans during LA Riots who had to protect their stores by themselves because the authorities didn’t give a shit.

        Asian Diaspora are one of the most vulnerable groups. Because a lot of us have successful bussinesses and racists are jealous and like to target us.

        So I’d prefer well regulated militias than police. Especially in the context of America where cops are horrible.

        • Jumbie@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The well regulated militia is now ICE. Thanks for your attention to this matter.

      • AxExRx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Especially since we have a model of what that society looks like, with places like Japan and great britain, most of Europe etc. They de-escalate to knife crime picking up the majority.

      • possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        vehicle ramming attacks are constantly increasing. people who want to kill will find a way to kill with whatever tools they have available.

        • SoloCritical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I’d choose you trying to run me down with a vehicle over shooting at me with an AR15 any day of the week.

        • Jumbie@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Then perhaps we should not let those people possess guns. Or vehicles , now that I think of it.

          Perhaps give them no weapons. Yes, yes, that’s it. Take weapons away from crazy people. Hey! I got it! Let’s get them into a database so we can see if they have murderous tendencies. Perhaps a test of some sort in order to own any weapons.

          What do you think?

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    145
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just gonna politely point out that America is living under extreme corruption and tyranny right now, and the 2nd amendment aint doing shit to help with that problem. Sure gets of innocent citizens killed, though.

    Just like any expected conflict ever, the 2nd amendment caused an arms race - and the govt is far, far more heavily armed than the people.

    • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The common modern interpretation of the 2nd amendment being that gun sales and ownership must be almost completely unregulated is bullshit and not at all the way it was intended to be interpreted. It was supposed to protect the right of people to form and maintain local militias independent from the federal government, hence the “well-regulated militia” wording. The idea was that if local governments maintained their own militias consisting of private citizens it would create a collective military force capable of keeping the federal army in check. The modern emphasis on individual gun ownership with no organization has clearly not served this purpose.

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Statistically speaking, buying that handgun is going to dramatically increase your odds of dying by firearm.

        • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          I know, probably partly because if you intend to use it, you’re more likely to get shot instead, or shoot yourself.That’s why it’s only a consideration, but also, domestic tensions are…less than ideal.

          But I have no kids, I’d take lessons and practice first, and I’d never leave ammo loaded. I do not want a gun in my home. I’m fine keeping them animated and fired with a gamepad.

          And I’d like to think in the very unlikely situation I’d need it, I wouldn’t, like, engage, like an idiot.

        • thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Not sure who’s downvoting this but the claim is verifiable.

          Here’s a John Hopkins report from 2023: https://publichealth.jhu.edu/center-for-gun-violence-solutions/data/annual-gun-violence-data

          What I think is the most interesting, and a fact I learned taking a firearms safety course here in Canada, is that the highest risk remains suicide.

          From the report: Gun suicides have accounted for the majority of all gun deaths each year since 1995.

    • arrow74@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Disagree, arms can absolutely be used to resist tyranny. Look at any resitance movement in history. They were effective. French resistance, Viet Cong, Taliban, etc.

      Each of these were far out gunned, but they won. In the case of the French resistance is probably more accurate to say they were effective then the allies showed up, but still.

      There’s more of a lack of willingness to rebel in the US. Power works, people have food, and the largest demographic of the population isn’t being shipped off by ICE.

      • yesman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Did you know that many 20th century historians argue that the French resistance was irrelevant to the outcome of the occupation? The Tienanmen Square protesters had captured stockpiles of small arms, how’d that go? There is no debate about the Black Panthers, Weather Underground, or any other left movement willing to do violence. They were all crushed by the US Government. I’m sorry to report, but Hampton was wrong: you can kill a revolution by killing revolutionaries.

        If you’re interested in history, I’d point out that successful revolutions are often accompanied by military defectors. The military guys will bring the guns. (and the ability to actually fight, unlike the average GI Jabroni)

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          The Tienanmen Square protesters had captured stockpiles of small arms, how’d that go?

          A small force occupying an urban square will not work. And was not the methods used by any group I mentioned. Yes if you sit in one spot superior numbers and technology always win.

          Which is why every example I gave you didn’t do that. Tactics do matter. Some revolutions succeed some do not. Either way you need guns

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The Bolsheviks are a good example. They started the revolution with the workers and peasants, because that’s the only way to start a revolution, but when the government turns the military on its own people they could then recruit them to the revolution.

    • FatVegan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Who is protecting your democracy?

      Well obviously Dale, the overweight guy who wants nothing more than owing guns and Nazis memorabilia

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      System works as designed. The second amendment fuckwits never cared about freedom and democracy at all.

      • Enkrod@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Oh there are plenty of lefty gun-brains, preparing for either the revolution or wanting to protect against a fascist government.

        They’re all gravely mistaken when they think that gun ownership does anything except increasing statistics for gun deaths and police shootings.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Law enforcement investigating the shooting canvassed several residences to the north of the deadly shooting and found that all but one – Adams’ – had “suitable shooting backstops or firing locations,” according to the affidavit.

    So… pretty much everyone in the area had a shooting range except the accused?

    • Floodedwomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah, this happened literally 4 houses down from me. We all shoot guns, but we have targets, and those that dont go down to the bridge and fire into the creek bank. This whole thing is because he was lazy/stupid.

      • valen@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Just checking, you go to the stream and shot lead bullets it? That then infiltrates the watershed. So there’s a lead poisoning problem in your area?

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      A “backstop” is not a shooting range…

      It’s usually just a pile of dirt.

      It’s wild for a bunch of people in a neighborhood to all be doing this, because even if the first couple are kind of safe about it, every idiot starts thinking jt’s safe to just shoot at a can or anything. All they know is they hear gunshots

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sounds like a terrible neighbourhood to live in, shots going off from everyone all the time

        • jonesey71@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I used to play a game with friends in Tacoma, WA, USA where we would sit outside at night and guess what the caliber was when we heard gunfire every 5 or so minutes.

      • Burninator05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        My parents have a place to shoot in their yard. It’s a stack of old railroad ties four deep, two wide and ten tall with dirt piled up around the back. There is an empty field for over a mile behind that. I can’t imagine using it if anyone was any closer.

        • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Under the right conditions, the NATO 5.56 x 45 mm can travel u to 3600 meters (4,000 yards). If one round, for some reason is shot above the berm, one mile is not enough. It does not take much to fuck up.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Backstop is not sufficient. You will miss it eventually. Should be a backstop and no one living behind it

            • TheOakTree@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              14 hours ago

              Honestly anything less than a 15’ berm or reinforced wall should not be a permissible firing location in a residential area. And I still wouldn’t put it past people to miss.

              Not that we really need personal firing ranges in everyone’s backyard.

  • VisionScout@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    8 hours ago

    There was a CSI episode with this plot!

    Chatgpt says it was the episode “Story of a Gun”

    • Noxy@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Chatgpt says

      please stop using chatgpt as a substitute for doing like three minutes of actual work to find the answer with any amount of certainty

      • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I think you (and I) are on the wrong side of that battle. I’ve been there so many times. I just find myself drifting away from popular culture. Started with refusing to use facebook and it’s companies a long time ago.

        Then, I set up a local LLM, fed it some manuals for some engines I work on, thought it was kind of an interesting way to interact with them. Ultimately, I just went back to the manuals. I haven’t touched an LLM, on purpose, for a year or so.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        These days if you search on google, their ai answers. And I have noticed the qualitynof the links after are noticeably worse. They are litterally breaking search to trick you into thinking AI is better. So it takes considerably more time to find real sources. I think we are stuck with Ai answers.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Really highlights the danger of guns. Bullet missed the ground and kept going .3 miles pass his target hitting a random person.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    And this is why we shouldn’t just let every fuckhead idiot have a gun.

    • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Fully agree and I’m multiple gun owner. In my home, the firearms and ammunition are stored separately and nothing is loaded.

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Gun owner here. The bar to owning a gun is so ridiculously stupid and easy. Anyone who says otherwise is stupid.

      It’s not difficult at all.

    • AreaKode@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Exactly! I don’t want to take away your guns. I want fuckheads like these to not be able to buy them in the first place.

    • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Gun ownership should come with a psych test and some kind of basic system for ensuring people understand the gravity of the device they are purchasing at minimum. As it stands, I can walk into a pawn shop a few blocks away and have a weapon in almost no time, and I’m all kinds of fucked up.

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Nope, every time this country has put in some kind of “test” to access a right it’s ultimately used by racists to disenfranchise people of color and anyone else they find undesirable.

        Maybe a mandatory class that’s simple based on attendance could work, but anything that requires someone making a subjective call will be abused

        • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Bullshit. I’m tired of assholes using racism as an excuse to not put controls in place.

          It’s just another type of godwinning a conversation. Just claim racists abused it once!

          • arrow74@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yes because as we can clearly see there are no racists in power abusing the system for their racist agendas…

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Subjective calls (“may-issue”) have already been determined unconstitutional by SCOTUS (Bruen).

  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Gun rights, keeping people safe since… Never.

    And keeping tyrants who abuse the constitution in check since… Also never.

    • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      These types of news articles always have me chuckling. And feeling bad for the victim(s). But chuckling at how stupid we are. Collectively.

  • 843563115848@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is it just a given that if a man’s middle name is “Wayne” he’s going to jail at some point?

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s gotta be a name for the look where a physically unfit/poor performing American tries to offset this by donning physically “tough” fashion accessories and hair dos.

    I know there’s gravy seals, but they kind of take it to the next level.

    This, it’s more like a defence mechanism. Like they’d totally get their ass kicked in literally anything—fighting, jogging, getting up out of a chair—but they keep themselves safe by dressing up and casting tough stares.