• Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    “You need to become a factory worker!” Meanwhile, factories are trying to automate every job possible.

  • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    4 days ago

    Okay then pay them a livable wage, and then they will be successful. Fucking billionaires need to put their money where their mouth is. A bunch of asshats

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      They do get paid well…

      For example, Lutnick claimed that technician jobs are promising gigs with a low barrier to entry, that can pay anywhere between $70,000 to $90,000 at the onset—no college degree required.

      The issue is the quantity of these jobs, not the quality.

      And once you’re in, you’re in…

      And not in a good way, you’ll get used to that 70k lifestyle in a year or two, but if you lose your job for any reason, there’s insane competition for the few spots you’re qualified for. And anything outside of this, you’ll never make that match.

      They’ll pay a little more to a very small amount of employees if it creates a captive and trained workforce.

      So, you’re right that “corporations are bad” you just don’t under the long game and the corporations do.

    • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Woah woah woah. Capitalism is the new terminology that’s what replaced slavery. Also why the aristocrats were all in.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    OK then make traditional factory jobs pay well enough to own a house and see your children through college again.
    A factory worker makes less today than they did in the 50’s!!! Because the 1% has managed to grab all the money in their infinite greed. The money grab of the rich is the biggest heist in the history of mankind.

    Also not every billionaire needs to flaunt with how enormously ignorant they are on basic issues of society.
    The rich need to be taxed on their fortune. Nobody needs to be as rich as the 1%.

    • phed@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      politicians, officials, scotus, those in positions of power, will steal, imbezzle, misuse any funds gained. lobbying should be illegal. this all needs to go or it amounts to little gained.

  • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Put your money where your mouth is and open a factory and pay above average wages, Jensen.

    You literally run a company that doesn’t manufacture anything itself but designs for others to manufacture.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Those jobs are all getting automated. And jobs that used to pay decent wages like trucking and being a taxi driver are slotted to be automated away, too.

    Same for many, many white collar jobs that were supposed to be the path out of this trap of poverty that the rust belt and other places were thrown into, starting in the 70s. A whole lot of MBAs think that they need to get rid of all the “excess” people on payroll…

  • TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 days ago

    No problem, just make a single income from one partner working a factory job enough money to live a comfortable middle class life again.

    Jobs a good’un

      • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s fine, because I’ll be making enough to afford it… as the outlined condition was a factory job that would pay well enough to afford a family home on that income alone.

        • REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          EDIT: So apparently everyone here is talking fiction not reality and I’m the only one who missed that. Anything can be a true statement if it’s not based on reality. I’m out.

          ~~I’m blown away by how bad lemmy is in economics. But to be fair, there are no good economics on this planet.

          No, you will be fired from your job because your company becomes uncompetitive in global market and goes under, leading to worse economy.

          There needs to be such a massive cooperation between all countries (including enemies) that this will never work.~~

          • TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            You’re missing the entire point here you dingus. We’re not talking about reality, were talking about what it would take for factory jobs to be considered success again.

            Obviously it’s not reality. THATS WHAT IM POINTING OUT

            • REDACTED@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              So what is the point of this? Might as well talk about economy in Harry Potter and claim you just figured out how to solve socioeconomical disparity

              • TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 days ago

                The point is that a billionaire CEO can’t just say “eh, people should be happy working in a factory” when he doesn’t provide the rest of the material reality that went with that when people were happy working in a factory

                • REDACTED@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  You know what - I’m starting to think most people here actually didn’t read the article, but only the title, and that’s where the confusion is originating from.

  • obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    As someone with a factory job, I agree. Admittedly I have a degree, and I’m doing supply chain work in an office, but a 75k setup machinist or CNC programmer job is pretty good compared to spending 100 grand in student loans to make 75K as an office drone.

    I wouldn’t advise anyone drop out of medical school to run a packaging line in a factory, but there are a lot of people who do pretty well. You land in a union shop or an ESOP and you can make real money.

  • PearOfJudes@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t disagree with this take but coming out of this billionaires mouth I feel he means it in a different way.

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Guaranteed he does mean it in a different way, that people should come work for his suppliers like TSMC at substandard wages only to be discarded and laid off in a few years when markets and demand shifts elsewhere.

  • falseWhite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    Fuck that piece of shit. I hope the AI bubble bursts soon and he loses his job and money. Has to work in a factory in unsafe conditions, gets into a horrible accident, becomes paralyzed and shits and pisses in his pants for the rest of his lives.