You don’t think a sovereign country can have a state religion if everyone in the country is part of that religion and wants it that way?

It’s referencing the deep divisions between creeds even though they are very similar from the outside.

The whole point is just a way of not revering the prophet as a god or idol. Like Catholic saints are borderline in their focus on the religiosity of that person but the church chose to ignore it because it was popular and helped them spread their religion.

But the implication is that it only matters for people who are already Muslim. It doesn’t make a difference what outsiders do.

It’s time based. Buddhism also had a similar ban on iconic representation of the Buddha. That’s why some early art will just have footprints or things like that. Islam should allow iconic representation of their prophet within 300 years.

Social ostracization or ridicule is an appropriate response to bad statements, not violence

Sulfur cools the planet but not by shading, it’s more similar to how CO2 acts but in reverse.

That’s not really relevant. Fine particulate emissions from coal power plants, which are already mostly gone in the US but are still used around the world, don’t travel a really long distance.

This is just fake propaganda.

That’s not how proof works.

All the rules have been exposed as toothless and being reliant on acting earnestly in good faith. It really doesn’t work in a partisan environment and it wasn’t built for a two party system.

What brand is it? I don’t see national alert as a setting?

You mean when Russia invaded in 2022, which nobody expected to actually happen because it was obviously stupid and wouldn’t work? America gave that order?

Nah, the really rich get their own private after hours DMV visit.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/kim-kardashian-shut-down-dmv-121732151.html