WASHINGTON (AP) — Empathy is usually regarded as a virtue, a key to human decency and kindness. And yet, with increasing momentum, voices on the Christian right are preaching that it has become a vice.

For them, empathy is a cudgel for the left: It can manipulate caring people into accepting all manner of sins according to a conservative Christian perspective, including abortion access, LGBTQ+ rights, illegal immigration and certain views on social and racial justice.

“Empathy becomes toxic when it encourages you to affirm sin, validate lies or support destructive policies,” said Allie Beth Stuckey, author of “Toxic Empathy: How Progressives Exploit Christian Compassion.”

Stuckey, host of the popular podcast “Relatable,” is one of two evangelicals who published books within the past year making Christian arguments against some forms of empathy.

The other is Joe Rigney, a professor and pastor who wrote “The Sin of Empathy: Compassion and its Counterfeits.” It was published by Canon Press, an affiliate of Rigney’s conservative denomination, which counts Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth among its members.

These anti-empathy arguments gained traction in the early months of President Donald Trump’s second term, with his flurry of executive orders that critics denounced as lacking empathy.

As foreign aid stopped and more deportations began, Trump’s then-adviser Elon Musk told podcaster Joe Rogan: “The fundamental weakness of Western civilization is empathy.”

Even Vice President JD Vance, a Catholic convert, framed the idea in his own religious terms, invoking the concept of ordo amoris, or order of love. Within concentric circles of importance, he argued the immediate family comes first and the wider world last — an interpretation that then-Pope Francis rejected.

While their anti-empathy arguments have differences, Stuckey and Rigney have audiences that are firmly among Trump’s Christian base.

“Could someone use my arguments to justify callous indifference to human suffering? Of course,” Rigney said, countering that he still supports measured Christ-like compassion. “I think I’ve put enough qualifications.”

Historian Susan Lanzoni traced a century of empathy’s uses and definitions in her 2018 book “Empathy: A History.” Though it’s had its critics, she has never seen the aspirational term so derided as it is now.

It’s been particularly jarring to watch Christians take down empathy, said Lanzoni, a graduate of Harvard Divinity School.

“That’s the whole message of Jesus, right?”

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Empathy is a sin.

    Exposing pedophiles is a sin.

    Protecting children is a sin.

    Healthcare for Gaza is a sin.

    Healthcare for Americans is a sin.

    Military force against the American people is God’s will.

    Not sure what kinda fucked up holy war people still supporting this shit believe they’re fighting, but it’s definitely not a Christian one and you’re commiting blasphemy by claiming it is.

  • TheHotze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Its the opposite of a sin. When Jesus sumed up the law and the prophets into two commandments, the one dealing with other people was basically be empathetic.

    " So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets." Matthew 7:12 NIV.

  • A7thStone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Of course they prefer the term sympathy. That let’s them feel like they are looking down in pity at a lesser.

  • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
    “Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.
    “Blessed are the gentle, for they shall inherit the earth.
    “Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied.
    “Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy.
    “Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.
    “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.
    Blessed are those who have been persecuted for the sake of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
    “Blessed are you when people insult you and persecute you, and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of Me.
    Rejoice and be glad, for your reward in heaven is great; for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Matthew 23 is about these kinds of people. Recommended reading, even for fellow atheists. Keep in mind that the scribes and pharisees that Jesus calls out over and over again were the conservative leaders of his time - “pastors and politicians” - behaving just as ours do today.

      • cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I call myself rich, but if I don’t go to work I don’t get paid, and if I don’t get paid I can’t pay the rent… and out the door I went go.

        People can call themselves Christians, but unless they actually follow the teachings of Christ, it doesn’t mean anything.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Is empathy a sin? Some conservative Christians narssists argue it can be

    Mostly a venn diagram containing only one circle.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 day ago

    Conservative Christians talking about the “sins” of others.

    THEY SUPPORT A CHILD RAPIST WHO IS AN ADULTERER. 🤷‍♂️

    • cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The true Christian response would be that Trump will be judged in the afterlife but that they still support what he’s doing in government… which is making things harder for people with darker skin and/or who are LGBTQ+. “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” and all that.

      Ask them if they would allow their preteen daughter to stay the night with Trump and you’ll see where their feelings truly lie. Many of them would! Many of them would happily traffick their child to him hoping that she might be his fourth wife and their family would benefit. A few would tell you that the accusations against him are inventions of the liberals, but those people are never mentally sound.

  • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fun historical fact: Adolf Hitler was not actually an atheist as is often commonly believed. He was actually opposed to atheism and tried to establish a German “Reich Church” that would teach Christianity aligned with Nazi propaganda. Sound familiar?

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not surprising considering the commonalities between cult leaders and fascist dictators. “Us” in group vs scapegoat “them” out group degenerates of the week, calling themselves family to distance from biological families and social support, hierarchy with an unquestionable leader on top, love me or suffer my wrath, etc. Even the way they talk from the pulpit or podium, no justification for any claims, just vibes and biases exploiting.

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Empathy is a sin because it goes against their Christian beliefs. They’re being persecuted.

  • mcv@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    As a Christian, I’m utterly disgusted by how these people are perverting my religion that’s supposed to be all about love for others. For your enemy, even.

    Feed the poor, shelter the homeless, heal the sick, visit the imprisoned and welcome the foreigner. That’s how we will be judged, according to Matthew 25.

    The pervert the words of Jesus. First the Prosperity Gospel, and now this.

    • Cargon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      What does your religion say should be done with these usurpers and blasphemers?

      • mcv@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Love them? But also counter their false teachings. Loving the people they mislead or hurt, and save them from harm.

        • cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          “Love the sinner, hate the sin” is the boilerplate answer, and fundamentally it’s correct, but also never forget that Jesus himself kicked over tables and brandished a whip at these people.

          Like, you always think of Jesus as this soft-spoken, kind-hearted individual who always tried to help people. But when he came back to the temple and saw people were using it to try to peddle their wares under the guise and protection of religion, he called that out and threatened violence. And he was right to.

        • Cargon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Is there a meaningful number of traditional Christians left? I haven’t seen much effort from churches to counter these false teachings.

          • Tempus Fugit@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            In fact I’ve seen the opposite. A traveling priest came to my mother’s church before the elections cycle last year and was spouting off about how leftism is evil and the cause for all modern societies problems.

          • mcv@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            There are a lot of Christians of many different varieties. None of the Christians I know would agree with conservative Americans.

      • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s a problem if you consider the Bible to be univocal. Considering the Bible to be univocal is a bad idea in the first place.

          • mcv@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I don’t, but the various books in the Bible were written in specific times and contexts, often times when slavery was common. The bible puts limits on slavery, says at various places to release slaves after 7 years, to pay them, to treat them well.

            One place in the NT that deals with slavery (and is pretty controversial because of that), is when Paul sends an escaped slave back to his master, with a letter to the master telling him to treat the slave as a brother, because they’re brothers in Christ, both children of God.

            Paul was trying to spread Christianity in Greece, where slavery was very common, and outright condemning it would probably make a lot of Greeks reject it. There are a lot of places where you can see Paul being very pragmatic about stuff as long as it helps spread the Word. So I guess “here’s you’re slave, but remember he’s your brother” is his compromise with slavery.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              And all your Lord and Savior had to do was say, “hey guys, you shouldn’t own other people.”

              Christianity WAS outright rejected at that time because it was extreme. So that’s not really an excuse, is it.

              • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                He did.

                And one of the scribes, having heard them talking and having noticed how well Jesus answered them, asked the question “Which commandment is the most important?”

                Jesus answered “The most important is ‘Hear this, Israel, the Lord, Our God, the Lord is singular. And you shall love the Lord, who is your God, with every emotion, every breath, every thought, and every bit of your strength.’

                “The second is the same. ‘You shall respectfully devote yourself to others as much as you do for yourself.’ There are no commandments more important than these.

                — from Mark 12.

                And the King Above All Kings will respond to them “Let me be blunt, the ways you behaved toward even the lowest of people, who are my brothers, you did to me.

                — from Matthew 25

                As a previous person mentioned, the whole “The Bible is a singular work of God’s literal word” argument is absurdist in the extreme, even if it’s mainstream today. This dogma began in the US in the 1900s with the Fundamentalist movement. Even the word “Bible” itself means “library.”

          • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I don’t, I’m an atheist. I also recognize that if you throw out univocality, then you can happily throw out the slavery bits.

            And you should throw out univocality to make any sense of the Bible at all.

              • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                It makes sense as much as any other text. Of course it has contradictions. The mistake is thinking the fundie approach is the only way to approach it; that’s buying into their game. It’s not even a singular book, but a collection of writings from across centuries.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          It was in the 1800s when it was used as justification for chattel slavery in the US. Including the printing of “slave Bibles” where all references to “freedom” and “liberty” were removed.

          And if you pay attention to what Republicans are saying, you’d recognize that this mindset never actually fully went away.

          • papertowels@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            If you want to try and use that as a cudgel for someone advocating to love thy neighbor, take care of the downtrodden, etc., feel free.

            Assholes are going to interpret things how they want. See the main topic of this post for reference.

            Doesn’t mean you should piss in the cornflakes of folks who are advocating for objectively good things. That makes you look like an asshole.