They genuinely believe liberal is an insult rather than an ideology that they disagree with which is kind of weird.

None of this reflects my experience here. Are they visiting lemmy?

Again their living room had to fit six or more. There are episodes where they have six people in Lucy’s house but rarely is it more than four or five.

Seinfeld had 4 main cast and they rarely had anyone else in their places other than the main 4. No one needed to fit a dozen people in a room.

Were you renting living space in NYC in 1994? I was.

Do you know anyone with a ridiculous place because of rent control policies? I know several. Everything about the show makes sense within the context of the time once you realize that eight or so people need to fit on the stage in many scenes

you think you know better than someone who worked on tv in NYC at that time?

Mary Tyler Moore’s show never had the expectation of holding six or more people in the same room like friends.

All in the family took place in a house. Im not sure how you miss this. It’s in the credits.

Lucy and her Husband never had more than a handful of people on screen at once. They dont need the space Friends does.

Friends needs a space for the main cast plus partners and that requires a larger space plus the ability to fit crew which requires large places. The bit about rent control makes perfect sense if you have experience with NYC real-estate.

NP,I was told the same thing by a camera guy back in the late 1990s about this exact show.

Some of that is due to the realities of filming in a stage made to look like an apartment as you need the space for the camera crew to fit. This everyone lives in massive places.

Literally all of your food and drinks in America are sold by the metric unit. That’s why it is on the packaging. Your “fifth” of vodka is actually 750ml and is not 1/5 of a gallon.

Who certifies the “proper” format? Im fairly sure it isnt dd-mm-yy

It’s a huge assumption on your part that they believed it. It was and it remains an instrument of control. They took considerable editorial liberties, too, with the supposed word of god.

That is an equally large presumption. I happen to agree that some were more interested in control but many were believers.

Anyway, even if they believed it that is STILL NOT EVIDENCE

To them it is. Do you not get that they believe they have the words of their divine being in book form? If their faith is correct it would be proof.

They can be depending on your vision issues. Mine are essentially bifocals where the reading portion isn’t visible. If I focus there’s a tiny fuzzy line where the readers meet the normal lens.

To be honest I wasn’t aware of the sides issue and it seems you might have different problem that requires a third lens.

Ineffective tax policies have different direct harms than other ineffective policies. Wealth taxes frequently do not bring in enough revenue which is a significant problem.

They don’t because many know the history of wealth taxes and how frequently they get abandoned because they are ineffective IRL.

No because rigging an election normally would take thousands of people working in secret. Trump won because America has a lot of dumb people in it

My kids?

multifocals areyour friend then

You potentially have an experience with a singular person and you are using that to decide wealth was the motivating factor and are using it to call all wealthy people pedos.

I don’t need counter evidence when the initial claim is this clownish.

The Third World orignally meant unaligned with the West or Warsaw Pact nations

Lamb- The Gospel According to Biff, Christ’s Childhood Pal.

It’s the story of Yeshua as a child/teen and his dipshit buddy. It’s hilarious.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamb:_The_Gospel_According_to_Biff,_Christ's_Childhood_Pal

Thanks but I dont want specs thatneed charging or can “crash”

You made a lot of claims that have nothing to back them other than vibes. Im not discrediting you because you never had credibility in this regard. You are wrong about your assertion that most rich people are pedos.

You have claimed to be a victim if abuse and you are asserting factually incorrect and irrational views regarding tens of millions of people. Do you think that is indicative of someone who has a healthy perspective?