• idiomaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I once wondered aloud how they get tanning beds to emit vitamin D. I then immediately corrected myself by saying that it was photosynthesis, which is technically correct, but doesn’t sound right in the context of animals. I did not feel smart.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      No, but I have done and said stuff that gives me an intense feeling of embarrassment when I recall the event.

      Wait, this isn’t a daily or near hourly occurrence? The longer you live you even have a longer list of these to recall intrusively when you’re doing completely unrelated things.

      • Today@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        And the worst thing about age-related memory loss is that those fucking moments are stuck like glue forever! Can’t remember my phone number but will never forget the stupid thing I did/said that one day

  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’ve forgotten how to spell “of” before because I couldn’t sound it out. Not my proudest moment.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      One funny quirky part of English is that many people (primarily phonetic sight readers) literally won’t notice if you substitute “ov” for “of” in the middle of a sentence. Sort of like how you can add the word “and” on both ends of a line break, and people won’t notice until you point it out. Their brain just sort of passively filters out the second “and”.

      And I bet a significant portion of people reading this comment went back to see if I intentionally added either of those to my comment.

  • schmorp@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I built a solar tracking system with light sensors for a solar cooker. It worked beautifully on a cloudless day but sometimes got confused when there were some clouds. Some weeks later I realized that my glorious invention was trying to find something we know the position of at any time during the day. Considering the time and money spent and how smart I had felt for building that monstrosity made me feel very dumb afterwards.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 hours ago

      A non-optical sensor based solution would require other sensors to calculate the relative position of the solar cooker oriented to Earth as well as calculate the elevation. Your solution is turnkey that you just slap down and it does everything needed without external input beyond solar radiance.

      Also, a whole bunch of your approach has many other applications with only very minor tweaks. I like what you did.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      If you replaced it with something that requires connectivity, then your first approach may have been a better design if even if it didn’t work out quite right the first time.

    • ooo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If it were able to retain coordinate tables, then after a sunny day calibration it could use that as fallback. And make limited micro adjustments and table updates as-needed.

  • truite@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I don’t recall my thoughts, but sometimes it goes trough my mouth. I once ask why bloody sunday was not a sunday on the calendar this year. Yeah because, you know… a date isn’t on the same day each year…

  • fading_person@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Don’t be so hard at yourself. We all have dumb thoughts here and there. It doesn’t look like so because people usually only externalize the good ones.

  • ooo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    For a moment I thought a motion-activated sink garbage disposal would be convenient so I wouldn’t have wet hands flipping the switch and dripping all over the counter.

    Heh.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Ever want to recreate the sensation of blindly sticking your hand in a bag with an angry wolverine?

      ooo has just the thing for you!

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      2Honestly, this isn’t a horrible idea. If the emotion sensor is in a different location than the actual disposal, Like a motion sensor under a black panel instead of the light switch to remove the electrical hazard chance