Two women were removed from a British Airways flight at Heathrow after an altercation reportedly provoked by a Make America Great Again (Maga) cap.

The incident occurred on Saturday as the women, aged 40 and 60, were preparing to board a flight bound for Austin, Texas.

Witnesses said that one woman took offence at her fellow passenger’s red Maga hat, worn by supporters of the former US president Donald Trump, and asked that it be removed, the Sun reported.

Punches were allegedly exchanged between the two women, both booked to fly in premium economy, before they ended up squaring up to one another in the cabin. When the captain called for assistance, police arrived at the scene to escort the passengers from the aircraft.

  • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I also want to punch MAGAs and their dorky red hats, but you don’t really get to tell them to remove them. That’s their dumb fucking choice. Not worth getting booted off a plane for. Your energy would be better spent walking past them multiple times during the flight to fart.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Of note, there’s articles of people being thrown off flights for Palestine related garb. Agree with all you said but the airlines are clearly splitting hairs

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Remember, they want to tell others what to wear and how to live - the least we can do is treat them the way they want to treat others.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    2 months ago

    Protip: when you’re on an airplane, the pilot will consider “can I keep everyone safe”.

    If no, they will have whomever removed they deem necessary to proceed safely.

    You have 0 say in this decision. The decision will not be reversed. Causing a scene will make it worse for you (think no-fly).

    On a plane? Pipe down. STFU. Get to your destination.

    • Thrashy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      On most carriers this is code for “coach, but it’s an exit row so we’ll charge extra for the legroom.”

      • Tanoh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, it isn’t.

        There are different names for different airlines, like economy plus or extra. Usually it means something like a bit bigger seats (usually not lie flat though), a less crowded section, better food, etc.

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          On domestic US flights, the “premium economy” tier is just an economy seat with an extra few inches of legroom, and sometimes complimentary alcohol. It might also be a refundable ticket if you buy it up front as opposed to as an upgrade. That’s all

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      No? More space, better position in the plane, better boarding group, generally better refund policy, better miles accrual

      Edit what’s the downvotes? Each thing is a more premium version of the basic economy.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          That’s silly and not seen anywhere in the commercial flight market

          Position in the place for example there’s only so much plane and there’s food space and bad. “Somewhat less shit” is a short rope as there’s only so many rows, and since are better than others.

          Being able to refund is clearly premium.

          Etc etc

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Material, physical changes to the customer experience.

              You’re literally getting a different seat as a product, or a different relationship with the purchase, as a service.

              I’m not simping for the airline here, but it’s literally different (and stupidly more expensive)

              • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                If I say that receiving 2 olives on my side salad instead of 1 is “a premium experience”, it’s not possible to prove that assertion false but it makes the word premium completely meaningless in any practical way.

                My point is, I’m not going to argue with you about your definition of premium.

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Well it’s clearly described what you get. It’s not just “more”.

      • modifier@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Its not going to be a good…rest of the year. Regardless of who wins, honestly. A kamala win just defines the specific way it will be shitty distinct from the shittiness of a Trump win.

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I hope a Kamala win results in a boot on the neck of the fascists that have propped up Trump… but they will probably do nothing. And let is fester.

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s a guy at work who wears a MAGA hat all the time. I often think about telling him I want nothing to do with him liking a fucking Nazi but have to be civil and polite because he also acts the same way. It fucking sucks I can’t tell him what I really think because we’re in a professional setting and it would be stupid to start something up.

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      If he’s bringing politics into the workplace, that’s unprofessional behavior, and he should be reported to HR.

      And just because you work together doesn’t mean you have to be friends. Only talk to him when it’s strictly necessary and ignore him otherwise, and he’ll probably eventually get the hint that you don’t like him.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        …he’ll probably eventually get the hint that you don’t like him.

        You give them far too much credit.

    • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      My job is also pulling the stupid “no political discussion because all opinions need to be respected” bullshit

      The opinion: immigrants should be deported, queer people killed, and women’s lives entirely controlled by men

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d rather just everyone be professional and I never have to know what they think politically. If only…

    • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      Just start wearing a “make fascists afraid again” hat and let him do the escalation (or something more subtle if necessary in your workplace)

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      At my company, is have to tell that guy he can’t wear that hat because we don’t allow people to wear political stuff. I’m not a fan of dress codes, but I’m a fan of that one.

      • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Agreed. My condo complex doesn’t allow flags or signs. We’re allowed holiday-appropriate door wreaths and that’s it. I’m wicked glad I don’t have to know my neighbors’ politics.

    • GroundedGator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      I hate it all. The hats, the flags, the yard signs, etc. But I also love them because I easily know the people I don’t want to be around and will never trust. The only thing more identifying is a badge.

  • exu@feditown.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I never knew Maga actual means something. Always thought it was some stupid they decided to use.

  • bundes_sheep@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Whatever you think about Trump, the person that demanded the other person remove their hat because they didn’t like it was in the wrong.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 months ago
    The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The Guardian:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Guardian is generally reliable. The Guardian’s op-eds should be handled with WP:RSOPINION. Some editors believe The Guardian is biased or opinionated for politics. See also: The Guardian blogs.
    Wiki: mixed - Most editors say that The Guardian blogs should be treated as newspaper blogs or opinion pieces due to reduced editorial oversight. Check the bottom of the article for a “blogposts” tag to determine whether the page is a blog post or a non-blog article. See also: The Guardian.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/oct/30/two-women-removed-from-ba-flight-after-altercation-over-maga-cap

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Fleur_@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    61
    ·
    2 months ago

    Getting mad over which flavour of centre right someone supports is truely the premium economy experience