I’m asking because I just had to verify my age thanks to YouTube requiring me to watch a video that was age restricted.

  • Meatball Man@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    You have absolutely f*cked yourself over by doing that. It’s not a matter of if that ID you just gave them is going to get leaked, it’s a matter of when and by who. These ID verification companies are infamous for mishandling this kind of information and are huge easy targets for hackers.

    I would highly recommend preparing for the worst now before it happens so when your ID does get compromised you already have things handled.

    Do not give these companies your ID unless you really like the idea of someone POS using it to commit crimes on your behalf.

  • Harold@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    … I just had to verify my age …

    No you did not. You chose to do so.

    I have not used WhatsApp in 10+ years, Windows in 4+ years, Google services in 2+ years.

    It is a choice, stop lying to yourself about having to accept things.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    you can ignore those. But services require ID/ facial scans is becoming more pervasive, and it only serves one thing surveillance.

  • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    15 hours ago

    No no no fucking NO!

    Do NOT accept this! Do NOT normalize this! DO NOT COMPLY!

    Did you really need to see that youtube video? If it was that important, then find another way. Lie. Get a downloader. Get creative. Or walk away, since it was probably not that important

    DON’T SELL YOUR IDENTITY FOR CONVENIENCE. DON’T WILLINGLY FEED THE SPIES MORE INFORMATION.

  • Ada@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Are you giving up your privacy to a profit driven corporation who absolutely can’t be trusted with it, just because you want to watch a video that has no real point other than entertainment?

    That’s what normalisation of age verification looks like…

  • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I don’t use services that ask me to prove my age, beyond a drop-down date picker, in which case I was born in 1969.

  • LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    17 hours ago

    For YouTube, use a VPN that terminates in Albania. Like magic, no more forced sign ins, or ads, or age checks.

  • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I haven’t age verified anything and I don’t plan to. It’s only normal when you normalize it. If something will no longer allow me access without verifying my age, I will either find a way around it or I will no longer use that thing. If Youtube is not going to let me watch age restricted videos, so what? I will not watch age restricted videos on Youtube. I will instead use an addon to find them on odysee or peertube instead if possible, or I’ll just live my life accepting that video probably wasn’t one I really needed that contained the only key to living a happy life. It’s not that important, certainly not important enough to verify my age to the surveillance police.

    If they try to make me age verify my home internet connection, well then I’m gonna have to get real creative, sure, but rest assured I will (with the help of the rest of the privacy-oriented community) find ways to obfuscate the fuck out of all traffic in and out of my network so thoroughly it won’t even matter if they know who owns my internet connection because it won’t even be relevant anymore. VPN everything. Become an open relay. Join the I2P project. Embrace mesh networking. Fuck them, they can’t stop us all.

    • osanna@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I haven’t tried for age restricted, but ytdlp works for those “sign in to verify you’re not a bot” prompts. Might be worth checking out if it works for those too. Or just you know, fuck yt off.

    • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      But don’t you still have to pass various websites’ internal checks in order to access their protected NSFW content?

      A VPN far as I know is useful for avoiding regional restrictions when it comes to content viewing.

      • amniotic druid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        No. Just exit to a country/state that doesn’t require age checks. Porn sites are not wasting any more effort than they have to checking IDs in places that don’t require it

        • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Yes, but I’m not just talking about porn, and I do think some sites enforce age checks regardless of local or international law.

          But… that’s just an impression, and I haven’t done anything remotely like a full test, so far.

          (see the sibling comment)

      • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Depends on how the site implements things. Age verification can be regardless of region, or it can just be for specific regions. This holds true for pretty much any feature.

    • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      YouTube pretty reliably blocks VPNs. The solution is to either not use their service, or accept the fact you can’t view some videos, and move on.

        • alakey@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          They don’t block it for logged in users yet, just like reddit, but if you are logged out and have no cookies then they will block the playback for known VPN IPs.

          • osanna@lemmy.vg
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Though I’m not going to say who and where my vpn is, I found a server that doesn’t block my vpn. Also, they don’t block Tor

        • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I suppose it’s possible you’re flying under the radar, if you’re not using a large-ish VPN provider.

          I’d also be checking for DNS leaks, out of paranoia.

      • LordMayor@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Not really. At least with Proton, I can just change the exit and it’ll work.

        That said, I can’t be bothered to do that most of the time. I’m not missing anything by not watching YouTube videos.

        • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          Weird. For me it appears like in the last ~wk they’ve dropped the hard block, and are now using captcha.

          It’s entirely possible I’m getting caught up in some A/B testing, because of my exits of choosing.

  • Gnergy@piefed.europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Hasn’t yet.

    Is becoming, yes. There are still plenty of opportunities to stop it provided that the democratic process remains somewhat functional and governments have not gone into “we are the rulers, we decide whatever we want, screw the will of the people” mode yet.

    I don’t have the answer on how far on the path toward that aforementioned mode we are. :(

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    It doesn’t have to be. While the real issue is like all surveillance, it will get pushed back against and then repackaged later as a “new” idea again.

    We’ve been doing this song and dance since the Clipper Chips.

    Once the politicians start realizing they cannot legislate math and that they are also at risk under these systems, we’ll see bigger pushback to them again.