I say “laughing my ass off”

Electricity too

It’s funny they use the word “disclosed” and not “sold”.
All the collection I knew about. I knew they used it for their internal metrics and recommendations. I didn’t know they sold it. I wonder how useful it is though.

Didn’t think of that
That’s very likely true

But it’ll be a great show to watch

That’s what I just figured out.

eh… 60-70% chance I’d guess.
So maybe probably?

That’s what I’m getting at. All the ‘Bad Guys’ who genuinely need the security to do bad things will just move to the other options, along with us tech savvy types. The only people they’ll be able to spy on are the normies who aren’t actually criminals…

Actually I think I get it now. I’m sure for many of them, it’s not about catching criminals at all.

I wonder if they understand, it’ll be impossible to truly stop this.
Even if they get some of the low hanging fruit. People will just move to the more secure, distributed, and anonymous options.
Or are they actually ignorant enough to believe this is something they can solve.

What’ll be hilarious, is when they file a class action suit to get their money back. That’ll be gloriously delicious

They aren’t inherently good or bad.
For the average person they tend to be fine.
For critical business or governments who need their machines to operate 💯. It makes sense to manage their own, with cautious limited test rollouts and what not.

LOL…
I promise you she was

I use Waterfox also

Chrome is an alternative browser for most people.
I know someone who insists they realy like Edge.

They’re promising not to attack a parade celebrating the defeat of the Nazis in 1945.

Knowing the players in question who would be writing the new constitution

We don’t know who. Members of the current government certainly wouldn’t. They have too much invested in the current system. They’d do everything they could to fight it. No revolution ever included officials or influencers from the old government.

As for what changes would be needed? That would be a massive list. Heavily dependent on details.
Generally speaking:

• More explicit guardrails around corruption.
• Less centralized power in the executive branch. Maybe multiple “Presidents”
• A mechanism for the public to unilaterally recall an elected offical.
• Intrabranch enforcement of powers over each other. So the courts can’t just be ignored.

That’s just the high flyers off the top of my head.

Both recent and high end are rather flexable terms, open wide to interpretation.

A self contained diving rebreather will work.
That’s a mask with extra steps.

I wasn’t that worried…
Now I am.

If you’re not willing to understand even the basics of what you’re talking about enough to explain your view, there isn’t anything to talk about. You’re just obviously wrong, and you don’t even care to know why. I’ve got nothing more for you.