Surveillance strategies in the UK and Israel often go global
Guess all transfer of digital medical data between hospitals is a hostile action.
So google, amazon and Microsoft are hostile actors.every cloud provider is an enemy of uk government. They have gardeners (at best) or lawyers ( most probably), which did their own research.before writing these abominations. At the same time, they want to give all medical datas in the NHS to palantir. This is the apoteosis of incompetence.
All those companies willingly hand over our data when asked. At this point it’s almost a feature
Wtaf?
Do you have a link to the law?
This is actually bonkers and goes to show that governments are loosing this battle, this just means that no matter what we cant stop.
The British ought to actively strike against and shut this down ASAP or they will lose their country to complete fascism. Say goodbye to any aspect of democracy.
Gee why does the capitalist oligopoly fear communication they can’t monitor it’s not like they are doing anything wrong and have anything to fear from little old us
Shit-flinging desperation at the realization that they have failed to contain dissent via internet-based coordination. Elbit and the UK’s protection of property was defeated by persistent disruption thanks to the work by Palestine Action. Unlike previous forms of communication, the empire has had tremendous difficulty wrestling control away because the materiality of the internet is so dispersed, accessible, and impossible to restrict without dire economic and military consequences.
“You are a hostile actor if we say you are a hostile actor.”
Reminder, rules for thee, but not for me
If i remember correctly, a few weeks ago a government party had their signal chat leaked. Those people have since ceased using signal right?
There’s no problem with Signal’s encryption. It’s the same issue with any and to end encryption scheme, at either end is a person who can very easily copy and paste everything that has been said in the conversation and send it off to anybody they wish.
Well, yes, generally the recipient of a message has to get access to its content.
No of course. I meant that if at least one party in the UK gov is using signal, with end to end encryption, they are no longer using it because they are now considered ‘hostile actors’
thats what happens when we as society become ignorant and inept, and therefore we vote for inept and ignorant people to represent us.
They are not all inept.
They know exactly what they are doing.
It is a hostile act to create information the state isn’t privy to. That is a very deliberate act.
Fascista
I think this is more malice than it is ineptitude tbh.
When has the majority not been ignorant and inept?
Back when societies collective knowledge was like 4 things?
So every financial institution and everyone using WhatsApp
So they’re happy for us to read all their messages, right?
I mean, they wouldn’t be wrong, but they don’t know why they aren’t wrong.
