• Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      I recall a story where there was a water restriction on a town for everyone, except for the golf courses. The next day, the golfers found that the Holes had been filled with cement, supposedly poured in there by activists.

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not a big deal. They move the holes every week to keep the wear on the green even. There is a hand tool that cuts the hole and you drop the plug in the old one. The cup is just a plastic sleeve. It takes less than 10 minutes a hole.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      my local subreddit once had a golf war thread. the golfers were adamant about how accessible their sport was and how amazing for the environment it was.

        • Matty_r@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          Probably because fields of grass are better than housing development? Which for the environment, is technically true

          • NannerBanner@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            I have a neighbor who thinks a golf course is better than a park. I just want to shake folks sometimes. How is a hellscape of a solitary grass better than a place where you could get all sorts of plants going? One with hiking paths for everyone, and all sorts of goodies like gazebos, meadows, benches…

        • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          oh basically just that it’s curated green space and that’s better because it’s not a parking lot or strip mall or etc.

          • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            That’s almost worth comparing, if the resources and human effort needed to maintain a golf course, plus any other positive or negative environmental impacts, are favorable to the effects of a parking lot or whatever. But I imagine that, either way, a proper public park would be way better.

            • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I mean it’s like anything, you can argue either way. Depending on how the grounds are kept it could be a net positive or a negative. But a lot of golf courses are massive polluter because they use resource-intensive grasses and lots of fertilizers and water to keep it alive. There are more eco-friendly ways to manage a golf course but those are not popular because they cost more and golfers don’t like scrub grasses