• MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s almost worth comparing, if the resources and human effort needed to maintain a golf course, plus any other positive or negative environmental impacts, are favorable to the effects of a parking lot or whatever. But I imagine that, either way, a proper public park would be way better.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean it’s like anything, you can argue either way. Depending on how the grounds are kept it could be a net positive or a negative. But a lot of golf courses are massive polluter because they use resource-intensive grasses and lots of fertilizers and water to keep it alive. There are more eco-friendly ways to manage a golf course but those are not popular because they cost more and golfers don’t like scrub grasses