• TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    oh basically just that it’s curated green space and that’s better because it’s not a parking lot or strip mall or etc.

    • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s almost worth comparing, if the resources and human effort needed to maintain a golf course, plus any other positive or negative environmental impacts, are favorable to the effects of a parking lot or whatever. But I imagine that, either way, a proper public park would be way better.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean it’s like anything, you can argue either way. Depending on how the grounds are kept it could be a net positive or a negative. But a lot of golf courses are massive polluter because they use resource-intensive grasses and lots of fertilizers and water to keep it alive. There are more eco-friendly ways to manage a golf course but those are not popular because they cost more and golfers don’t like scrub grasses