• Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      32 minutes ago

      It does sound really weird, however, the way I see it is both countries are under obligation for defense forces anyway, and already go into each other’s air space in order to do this. So, by Canada not buying the jets( Which I agree with that decision at this point because the US has heavily dropped the ball while increasing prices.) that doesn’t change the fact that they were counting on those jets for coverage, which means that they need to gain that coverage from somewhere in order to uphold current agreements.

      The ambassador was just stating that they will need to attempt to alter NORAD’s deal with them because if Canada isn’t going to supply the coverage, then if they were to keep the same coverage, the US would have to send more jets in which he is complaining about.

      Honestly, the title of this article is clickbait to the point where I don’t even think the article title itself is accurate to the article anymore. It’s borderline misinformation at this point