Climate change is making severe storms both more common and more intense.

First the river rose in Texas. Then, the rains fell hard over North Carolina, New Mexico and Illinois.

In less than a week, there were at least four 1-in-1,000-year rainfall events across the United States — intense deluges that are thought to have roughly a 0.1% chance of happening in any given year.

“Any one of these intense rainfall events has a low chance of occurring in a given year,” said Kristina Dahl, vice president for science at the nonprofit organization Climate Central, “so to see events that are historic and record-breaking in multiple parts of the country over the course of one week is even more alarming.”

It’s the kind of statistic, several experts said, that is both eye-opening and likely to become more common because of climate change.

    • Dorkyd68@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      Honestly it was Obama. Biden died long ago and the wh just used a clone of him. See he used biden as a puppet so he could still have access to the white houses adrinochrome stash. They keep it stock piled in the basement.

      Source: my friends older brother that smokes weed all day

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    You’d think that would be eye opening and somewhat concerning to folks. But I’ve found what tends to happen is ‘record fatigue’.

    We’ve had ‘record high’ temperatures here in the Netherlands frequently the past few years. Meaning, the news will report ‘it’s the hottest july 1st since the start of the measurements’ and that ‘the previously hottest july 1st was in 2017’

    Basically, it’s telling you two things:

    • it’s a record high temperature
    • the time between these records is decreasing.

    Which obviously means things are getting worse. But most people just shrug and go ‘Gee, another record high temperature, how boring, those happen so often’.

    Same thing with other types of problematic weather. At least stuff like record rainfall or flooding is hard to ignore.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      They’re literally turning to “weather control” conspiracy theories rather than just accepting the known science.

    • Hobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      I think this too, but I think the reason people get desensitized to it is that it just happens so frequently that it turns into background noise. Similar to alarm fatigue that nurses experience in ERs. Sort of an interesting piece of alarm fatigue is that too many warnings make people ignore them completely, and we get increasingly alarming news about climate almost daily at this point.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alarm_fatigue

      • Null User Object@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        25 minutes ago

        I think the reason people get desensitized to it is that it just happens so frequently that it turns into background noise.

        This, but also a, “WTF more than I’ve already done am I supposed to do about it?” attitude.

        The billionaires are still globetrotting in their private jets. The corporations are still spewing out pollution in the name of shareholder value. And our political leaders are, at best, saying, “Golly, maybe we should do something about this,” and at worst, actively denying that there’s a problem and doing everything they can to block any attempts to fix anything.

        So you can’t really be surprised when regular people just throw up their hands and say, “Fuck it! I did my part. I need to prioritize protecting myself and my family now.”

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Thoughts and prayers. Sincerely, your fellow Americans who told you climate change is real and bad.

  • Ileftreddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If 4 of them happened in a week, they are not once in a thousand years, lol, they are weekly occurrences

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 minutes ago

      Believe it or not, there’s actual science and statistics that go into what is considered a “100 year storm” or “1000 year storm”, and yes they will be adjusted. That’s how it’s meant to work.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Make large reservoirs to catch all the water! This will cause it to never rain again. Just like setting up flood alarms. If it does ever rain you’ll catch water.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The weather this year is scaring me more than normal in south Texas. Not because the abnormal amount of rain but because the absolute lack of heat. Usually this time of year it’s 100+ for weeks on end.

    • ...m...@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      …yeah, last year i was telling everyone to enjoy the hundred-degree weeks while they can because it would be the coolest summer for the rest of their lives, then this year comes a long and spoils it…

  • yucandu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Fun fact, the reason we all call it “climate change” and not “global warming” was because the George W Bush administration directed NASA to do so, as they deemed it less “scary” to the public:

    In interviews, Republican politicians and their aides said they agreed with the strategist, Frank Luntz, that it was important to pay attention to what his memorandum, written before the November elections, called ‘‘the environmental communications battle.’’

    In his memorandum, Mr. Luntz urges that the term ‘‘climate change’’ be used instead of ‘‘global warming,’’ because ‘‘while global warming has catastrophic communications attached to it, climate change sounds a more controllable and less emotional challenge.’’

    Also, he wrote, ‘‘conservationist’’ conveys a ‘‘moderate, reasoned, common sense position’’ while ‘‘environmentalist’’ has the ‘‘connotation of extremism.’’

    President Bush’s speeches on the environment show that the terms ‘‘global warming’’ and ‘‘environmentalist’’ had largely disappeared by late last summer. The terms appeared in a number of President Bush’s speeches in 2001, but now the White House fairly consistently uses ‘‘climate change’’ and ‘‘conservationist.’’

    https://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/02/us/a-call-for-softer-greener-language.html

    What drives me insane is how everyone on the left just… went along with it. Now we retroactively rewrite history and claim that they were always separate terms with entirely different distinct meanings. And knowing that so many highly educated, inquisitive, independent thinking people didn’t think to question that or look into that, it frightens me.

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The left went along with it because they were tired of all the “then why is it so cold in winter?” comments from the stupid half of the family tree.

    • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      While the Bush administration certainly had (very obviou$) reasons for trying to downplay it, I also remember at least some scientists at the time arguing that climate change was a better term because people are particularly stupid about the term global warming when it paradoxically results in some places having a greater number of and more extreme cold events.

      Ex: every time some dumbfuck Republican brought a snowball into Congress to talk about how global warming is fake because look here’s snow!!

    • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Good to know! They should have been a little more creative and called it something familiar and snappy like Sport Utility Environment or Gas Guzzler.

  • LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    So remember that tipping point we were warned about? Yeah, its happening. The deep ocean currents in the southern ocean have reversed.. TLDR: warmer saltier carbon dioxide rich water is now coming up from the deep ocean instead of being trapped there. It is melting sea-ice from below and could eventually lead to the reversal or stagnation of other ocean currents.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Even better, this occurred about a decade ago, and we didn’t even realize it untill now… meaning the global thermohaline circulation cycle has been collapsing for a decade.

      Oops.

      Irreversible. Can’t fix.

      No going back.

      In all likelihood, we have Great Filtered ourselves.

      Best case scenario, we get a century or so, starting basically now, of civilization collapse, mass famine and death, attempts at mass migrations that mostly get Holocausted, and of course wars, potentially nuclear wars…

      …and then maybe in 100 years the remaining human population of roughly 1-2 billion can maybe figure out a new paradigm… if we have not just permanently broken the biosphere, and already extracted all the easily extractable natural resources.

      • brandocorp@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        My money is on nuclear self-destruction. We have way too many of these things in the hands of extremely poor leadership. It really feels like it’s just a matter of time.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is gonna create some real bad problems for building codes. Lots of stuff is designed with statistical probabilities in mind, where they account for varying levels of rare extreme weather events. If the 1 in 100 years storm becomes a 1 in 10 years storm, then lots of stuff will be in trouble.

  • Lembot_0004@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Trump: See how it is? Even the best storms are in the USA now! Make Rains Great Again. Glory to the beautiful me!

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Marjorie Trailerpark Greene is literally advancing a bill to ban chemtrails.

        A thing that does not exist nor happen at any kind of scale whatsoever, beyond very, very limited and occasional scientific tests… decades ago, and were funded via programs and grants the Big Bullshit Bill and other Trump EOs have decimated.

        They do, literally, unironically, blame made up, magic, conspiracy nonsense instead of even attempting to agree with the vast, vast, vaaaaast majority of climate scientists, and even corpo scientists that work for fossil fuel companies that broadly predicted all this would happen roughly 30 years before public science caught up with it (thanks to the lobbying and propoganda campaigns of the same fossil fuel corps.)

        They will do literally anything other than admit that they are wrong, their understanding of the world is objectively delusional.

        They’re too good at magic sky daddy logic.

      • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 day ago

        He already was blaming the Texas floods on Biden. The all powerful Biden, causing all kinds of trouble 7 months after he left office. Trump wishes he had power like that.

        • chingadera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Unfortunately he does. The aftermath of this regime will take a minimum of 50 years to fix, if it can be.

    • abrake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Anyone remember this classic line from Trump 1.0 about hurricane Florence?

      This is a tough hurricane, one of the wettest we’ve ever seen from the standpoint of water