• Axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 年前

    Flatpaks are good, especially compared to snap.

    The future is atomic OS’s like silverblue, which will make heavy use of things like flatpak.

      • HayadSont@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        They have their place, but they can’t really completely replace traditional distros.

        As it stands, I kinda agree. But I truly wonder to what extent we might be able to close the current gap.

    • olenko@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 年前

      Immutable OSes are difficult to use for coding or other tasks that include installing many terminal utilities and for that reason, I don’t recommend them and certainly don’t want them to be the future of Linux distros. And if I’m going to create a container running a different distro to install and run the apps I want to use, then I may as well use that distro on my host.

      • Axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 年前

        You just move to user directory installation of most tools via brew on Linux. It’s not difficult. The Bazzite distro handles all this incredibly well via brew, flatpaks, and distrobox.

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 年前

      Snap is not all bad if you’re on a Ubuntu based distro, I just don’t like the way it’s pushed and that it comes from Ubuntu mostly. Startup time is a major issue for me also, but all in all it works.

      I’m still sitting on the fence, heavily prefer flatpak but when Ubuntu is going to package nvidia drivers in a snap it’s a thing I’m up for trying.

      My understanding is that if I’m on Ubuntu and the snap uses the same underlying Ubuntu version as my distro it should be fast but I haven’t seen it.