• Frokke@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    It is different. It’s genital mutilation. Has fuck all to do with gender affirmation

        • Corvidae@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Circumcision (genital mutilation) on infants is widely practiced, thus logically it must be okay. This article asserts Biden says gender affirming surgery should be delayed until 18 years old (not okay on infants)

      • Frokke@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Please point out where I wrote anything remotely close to that. Go ahead, I’ll wait.

        • Yax@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I read that as not being directed at you but more as realisation that the state of things are even worse than suggested in the first comment.

          “Why is this specific gender affirming care ok but not the rest?”

          “That specific thing is actually mutilation”

          “So to THEM (not you) mutilation is ok but not gender affirming care(any at all)!”

        • Corvidae@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Please point out where I used quotes and claimed you said it. Go ahead, I’ll wait.