return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agoUS surgeon general calls for cigarette-style warnings on social media platformswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1269arrow-down15
arrow-up1264arrow-down1external-linkUS surgeon general calls for cigarette-style warnings on social media platformswww.theguardian.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-squareUFO64@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·2 years agoWhy did you not understand it then?
minus-squaretal@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down6·2 years agoI did. What are you taking issue with?
minus-squarefuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·2 years ago a government campaign* to get rid of* They didn’t get rid of cigarettes, they just put warning labels on them. They want to do the same thing to social media.
minus-squaretal@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-22 years agoThe point of cigarette warning labels was to kill off tobacco use. They didn’t ban cigarettes either, but that’s got nothing to do with the aim of the campaign.
minus-squareMegaUltraChicken@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoSo would other warning labels required by law also be considered a campaign against said products?
minus-squareameancow@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-23 months agodeleted by creator
Why did you not understand it then?
I did. What are you taking issue with?
They didn’t get rid of cigarettes, they just put warning labels on them. They want to do the same thing to social media.
The point of cigarette warning labels was to kill off tobacco use. They didn’t ban cigarettes either, but that’s got nothing to do with the aim of the campaign.
So would other warning labels required by law also be considered a campaign against said products?
deleted by creator