Not a kook. Legit scientist. He has a PhD in theoretical physics, not a theoretical PhD in physics. While he spends a lot of time as a science communicator, he has his bona fides.
Yes, it’s all just theories and intuition like all nascent science.
I read a book of his once about theoretical ways to make sci-fi technology a reality. It was interesting in a hard sci-fi kind of way, but what really annoyed me was that he kept presenting his ideas as how they would work rather than how they could work.
Just looking at what people 100 years ago thought life would be like today should be a good indication that while theorizing about the future is interesting and a good way to get ideas moving, future technology is never going to be exactly what you think it will. If we knew exactly how this stuff would work, we wouldn’t be imagining it, we’d just make it.
I remember from a podcast with a guy in the same area of Kaku saying that he’s not seem with good eyes in their community for saying things that doesn’t make much sense.
He’s a heavily published professor of theoretical physics that has been working on string theory, and working as a science communicator, for decades. I have one of his books from the 90s. Globally well-respected smart dude.
By comparison, you kind of seem like a kook because you can’t search a name before making assumptions about someone based on physicality alone.
![References: [1] out of his ass](https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/7d954d56-4739-4230-b641-f7a2ed05fa5c.jpeg){kind=link}
I see nothing wrong with suggesting that, so long as it is made clear he is discussing one of many theoretical possibilities.
Is he a kook? He does kinda look like one, but so do a lot of legit scientists, so that’s not a good measure.
Not a kook. Legit scientist. He has a PhD in theoretical physics, not a theoretical PhD in physics. While he spends a lot of time as a science communicator, he has his bona fides.
Yes, it’s all just theories and intuition like all nascent science.
A PhD is not a “get out of Jail” card for kookery.
He is definitely part of the “woo” people in his field.
I read a book of his once about theoretical ways to make sci-fi technology a reality. It was interesting in a hard sci-fi kind of way, but what really annoyed me was that he kept presenting his ideas as how they would work rather than how they could work.
Just looking at what people 100 years ago thought life would be like today should be a good indication that while theorizing about the future is interesting and a good way to get ideas moving, future technology is never going to be exactly what you think it will. If we knew exactly how this stuff would work, we wouldn’t be imagining it, we’d just make it.
How so?
He has been on Coast to Coast AM he has been on Joe Rogan and other scientists in his and other fields are often not happy with his outreach.
For example
https://profmattstrassler.com/2013/03/19/why-professor-kaku-why/
Thanks! Very helpful. Maybe he is a cook, or values his celebrity over his science. Wouldn’t be the first sellout.
well thats disappointing, I just bought one of his books in an attempt to understand quantum better
String theory is a dead theory. Don’t waste your time on it.
You can be both credentialed and a kook, can’t you? I remember him from his regular guest appearances on Art Bell’s radio show.
Can be? Sure. But is he? No.
lol, I just rolled through HELIOS One on this current play through of F:NV
https://fallout.fandom.com/wiki/Fantastic#%3A~%3Atext=they+asked+me+how+well
There are plenty of crazies who have their PhD in some branch of physics/math. One of the reasons I stopped at a bachelor’s in physics.
Its almost a prerequisite. But from what I’ve read of him in the past, he’s pretty far out there.
I remember from a podcast with a guy in the same area of Kaku saying that he’s not seem with good eyes in their community for saying things that doesn’t make much sense.
That’s a tad vague. Who said the quote?
“Never shall two scientists of the same trade meet, but the conversation ends in a fight over semantics and one-upmanship.”
It was probably me, but I’m paraphrasing here.
Not a Kook, he is Kaku.
He’s a heavily published professor of theoretical physics that has been working on string theory, and working as a science communicator, for decades. I have one of his books from the 90s. Globally well-respected smart dude.
By comparison, you kind of seem like a kook because you can’t search a name before making assumptions about someone based on physicality alone.