It seems kind of primitive to have power lines just hanging on poles, right?

Bit unsightly too

Is it just a cost issue and is it actually significant when considering the cost of power loss on society (work, hospital, food, etc)?

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    sweden hasn’t had residential power lines on poles since like the 70’s. when i visited north america in 2008 i was shocked by the aerial rats’ nests everywhere.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Meanwhile as an American Japan shocked me with their electrical situation. Modern buildings just running wires openly along the walls and even urban areas having overhead wiring

      • Overspark@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        The price of electricity in a country usually has nothing to do with whether power lines are run above or below the ground. Very often a large part of your electricity price is determined by taxes and subsidies for example. And in my country (the Netherlands) the suppliers of electricity are different companies than the ones responsible for the power network too. Like Sweden we haven’t had residential power lines running above ground for half a century or so, it’s pretty uncommon in (Western?) Europe.

      • FBJimmy@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Well yeah, it’s quite easy to keep your energy prices low when you

        • have a wealth of hydrocarbon sources in-country
        • supplement them by bombing other nations until they give you there’s
        • don’t give a flying fuch about the planet
      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        idk where that place pulls from but i pay $.08/kWh. when i lived further north it was $0.02.

        there was a period where the prices went to what you quoted but that was in connection to the nord stream sabotage where germany’s prices skyrocketed and ours were dragged up along with them.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        That could be it.

        Digging isn’t free in Sweden either, right? Maybe OP thinks they’re ugly, but sometimes good enough is good enough.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Sweden has residential electricity prices at $0.2768/kWh.

        The US averages $0.1798/kWh.

        I accept the cost-benefits analysis and wish to proceed on this quote.

      • FBJimmy@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Population of Sweden: 10.6 million

        Population of the USA: 340.1 million

        So the population density is very similar and I therefore don’t understand what you’re getting at.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        okay? we don’t bury high-voltage lines, if that’s what you’re implying.

        • roofuskit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I mean there’s a cost per mile to lay cable underground, and that cost per customer goes down when the population density is higher, which it is in all of Europe compared to the US.

            • roofuskit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              In certain areas. But most of the us has a rather low density. You don’t see above ground lines in most US cities.

              • lucullus@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                I really don’t understand that argument. So is most of the US not connected to the sewers? Since these are also dug underground. If you already dig trenches for the sewer system, then you can also place electricity lines for relatively cheap. Though that was not done in the US and retrofitting is a big cost, usually only done, when you need to dig either way (e.g. for modernizing the sewer system). So its more about the default and if a country can take the opportunity when sewers get modernized

        • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It’s easy when nearly all of your population lives in a third of your landmass mostly in the south. We’re still talking about residential. Most of our cities and towns are also not walkable if that gives you an estimate of how spread out we are even in urban areas here.

          Besides it took laws for power companies to get the last rural communities and families. I remember my grandparents talking about it. Honestly the better investment would be putting up solar panels cut off from the grid with battery banks to cover the most rural over here.