It seems kind of primitive to have power lines just hanging on poles, right?

Bit unsightly too

Is it just a cost issue and is it actually significant when considering the cost of power loss on society (work, hospital, food, etc)?

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    okay? we don’t bury high-voltage lines, if that’s what you’re implying.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I mean there’s a cost per mile to lay cable underground, and that cost per customer goes down when the population density is higher, which it is in all of Europe compared to the US.

        • roofuskit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          In certain areas. But most of the us has a rather low density. You don’t see above ground lines in most US cities.

          • lucullus@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I really don’t understand that argument. So is most of the US not connected to the sewers? Since these are also dug underground. If you already dig trenches for the sewer system, then you can also place electricity lines for relatively cheap. Though that was not done in the US and retrofitting is a big cost, usually only done, when you need to dig either way (e.g. for modernizing the sewer system). So its more about the default and if a country can take the opportunity when sewers get modernized

            • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Yeah, there’s quite a bit of residential on septic tanks here. Incorporated towns is usually the line where public sewer exists. Before you ask, not every home here is on municipal water either nor natural gas. I remember a family growing up that got water deliveries for their cistern if their well ever ran dry. My childhood home had a giant propane tank for our gas appliances and a septic tank system because we lived on the other side of an interstate highway even though we lived “within the city limits”. I remember dad always saying it was difficult for the utilities to bore under the interstate to get the handful of homes (maybe 50 of us?) in the city limits on the other side. More homes in the USA have access to power than municipal water, moreso than natural gas, and much moreso than public sewer. Like I said elsewhere, we are really spread out. This guy really puts it into perspective

    • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s easy when nearly all of your population lives in a third of your landmass mostly in the south. We’re still talking about residential. Most of our cities and towns are also not walkable if that gives you an estimate of how spread out we are even in urban areas here.

      Besides it took laws for power companies to get the last rural communities and families. I remember my grandparents talking about it. Honestly the better investment would be putting up solar panels cut off from the grid with battery banks to cover the most rural over here.