• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    227
    ·
    1 day ago

    Watch the video.

    It’s tough, because it’s literally a video of a murder.

    But we all have to watch it.

    3-4 Icicles at holding a man down and beating him, one of them lets off a single shot that instantly makes their victim go limp. Then 2-3 other icicles all draw and fire multiple shots into the body while the rest scatter.

    Shit isn’t getting better and complying doesn’t work.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      105
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is why I’m saying we need to get even more violent in retaliation.

      People can downvote me all you want, but you know I’m right. It’s literally the only thing these actual monkey-brains understand: violence.

      If there’s 4 of them beating and killing one person, there needs to be at least 10 of us with knives and aluminum bats hitting right back. We need to mix up our own chemical warfare agents.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        we need to get even more violent in retaliation.

        That’s how you lose.

        That’s what they want.

        Right now two white people getting killed by ICE in broad daylight with dozens of cameras on them is slowly but surely destroying the GOP. There’s nothing that shifts public opinion more than a clear narrative of “good guys” and “bad guys”. When one side is armed and the other side is unarmed, and the armed people are killing unarmed people, there are clear good guys and bad guys. The white house is doing everything they can to spin the Minneapolis victims as “terrorists”, but when they’re unarmed it’s a matter of seconds to disprove what they’re saying.

        As soon as the anti-ICE protesters start getting armed and start shooting back, the story gets complicated again. It becomes much easier to claim the protesters are violent if they’re shooting back. It’s dead easy to claim an ICE goon feared for his life if someone shot at him.

        “They’re shooting at ICE” gives Trump the excuse he needs to send in the military and start having guys in APCs start shooting heavy weapons into a crowd. It’s also much more likely the soldiers are going to obey if they’re getting shot at. If they’re sent in against unarmed protesters and ordered to mow them down, it’s very likely they’ll refuse that order. And, refusing that order would be a big step in the end of the Trump regime.

        Not shooting back is the main thing that the Minneapolis protesters have done right so far. It’s also the most difficult thing to do.

        But hey, it’s America. America thinks guns solve problems. So, go solve that problem Americanely, while the rest of the world just watches the US tear itself apart and shakes their heads.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        71
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        there needs to be at least 10 of us with knives and aluminum bats hitting right back.

        No, because that will make them open fire…

        What will work is protesters in plated vests with rifles.

        Every state is different. For Minnesota it’s illegal to open carry a rifle, and there’s no permit to open carry a rifle. But if you get a permit to carry a handgun, you’re now allowed to carry a rifle.

        The threat of effective violence is more effective than the actual act of ineffective violence, even when the threat is just passively implied by the presence of rifles and plates.

        It costs less than a grand to get kitted out just like an ICE agent, hell, most of them don’t even seem to carry rifles, but all the more reason for protesters.

        • Wytch@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          42
          ·
          1 day ago

          The Black Panthers seem to understand what it’s gonna take to deter Miller’s stormtroopers. Superior firepower.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          Protesters should assign disciplined guardians: Kitted out, and watching from rooftops and windows.

          These terrorist cowards might come to understand the words “constitutional oversight” when they break RoE and are gravely punished from above in return.

      • John@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        1 day ago

        Show up alone, you get arrested. Show up with 100 people, you get shot. We need to show up with 100,000+ people.

        Organize! Join an organization! DSA, PSL, something anything!

        • athatet@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          What you do is break that 100k up into 100 separate 1000 person marches. That then also spreads out the Feds and makes it basically impossible for them to round everyone up.

        • Pretty sure they did have 100k+ people yesterday at least. Maybe not yet this early, but 100k people does not mean much when the organized violent thugs just wait until they can find people away from the large crowds and murder them on the street.

      • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Other people who read the news are not idiots and do not need this thinking outlined for them, it does nobody besides feds trying to make bullshit arrests for terroristic threats any good to share these thoughts on public forums

      • brooke592@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I just don’t want our guys to get hurt.

        Don’t make a stand in a blaze of glory. The goal should be to make sure nobody knows who did it.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’m about to watch the video, but just want to state my thoughts after reading the article:

      Video shows several agents wrestling the man to the ground and shooting him multiple times

      This is the only information the article states. Their passive language suggests to me the sequence of actions is unclear, but probably that while wrestling him, he was shot before being fully restrained

      Now to watch the video and find out if the wording is propaganda


      2 notes:

      1. That shooting is so much worse than the wording would suggest

      2. I didn’t realize the article was in a feed format. Explains why it was only 1 sentence

    • Kirp123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 day ago

      I watched it multiple times and they just executed that guy. They just unloaded the entire clip into the body. Fucking hell that’s just gruesome.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        At some point for these highly insecure “warrior alpha” types: “stopping the threat” just turns into jacking off with excitement.

      • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I’m trying really hard to see how this could be anything else than a straight up execution. It’s hard to see any way that dude could be threatening the life of anyone here. He’s shot on his knees with his hands down looking away from the shooter (granted the footage we have here it’s kind of hard to tell just cause there’s so many people). There’s footage of him talking to the agents before just holding his phone to record and then they start shoving him. There’s also 8 bajillion agents beating the shit out of him right before. The woman’s footage from the other side of this will show a ton if she was recording.

        Anyways, I look forward to hearing how this heroic agent saved the lives of all his fellow warriors during this altercation. Hope the agent recovers from the assault safely and quickly in the hospital…

        Edit: few things, someone pointed out the agent in the grey coat disarms the victim and runs away with his weapon before he’s killed which I did not see at first.

        Also, second lady’s footage is now out and it doesn’t show anything different than a bunch of thugs beating the shit out of this guy and then killing him.

        • foofiepie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Her footage (NSFW)
          From this it seems more obvious to me that they saw a gun on him (I think I hear the agents shout ‘gun’) and they panicked and shot. Lack of training and discipline. Just horrific.

          Why they unloaded the rest of the mag when he was clearly incapacitated I don’t know. Total lack of respect for human life.

          This is outrageous, and there should be swift justice.

    • taco@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      But we all have to watch it.

      Repeating for emphasis. Official stories are already being posted that are blatantly not what happened. There will be some portion of the population that believes the lies they’re told. It’s powerful for your own sanity to be able to know with certainty that you’re being fed bullshit because you remember seeing it with your own eyes.

    • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I disagree about everyone having to watch it.

      I am capable of believing you, others that have seen the footage, and the reports coming out about what’s happened here. Seeing the act in full detail isn’t going to strengthen my resolve against ICE, nor make me more empathetic to this man or his family.

      This is all barbaric, and while I similarly don’t think it’s getting any better, I don’t have to watch a recording of the last moment of this man’s life to know he was murdered, just as you don’t have to go see his corpse in the morgue to know the same.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        No.

        You need the visceral emotional reaction.

        That’s different than logically understanding the abstract concept a murder happened. That’s not new, but what happens in this video is new. It crosses the line in an inexplicable fashion and either enough people see it happen once in this video all at the same time, or we all wait to see it individually in person

        • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          With respect, don’t tell me what I need based on what you need.

          I don’t need to see a thing to have an emotional reaction to it. I am not a child lacking object permanence.

          Being able to watch a dozen different angles of a person’s death in high definition isn’t necessary for everybody. Most murders have no footage, and empathy can still be experienced for them. Surely you also run the emotional gambit when you read of a school shooting, whether or not there is footage of the carnage, don’t you?

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            With respect, don’t tell me what I need based on what you need

            You don’t understand any of this, but if you were polite and asked questions I would have explained it and you’d have walked away from this with more knowledge than you had now.

            Think about who really lost in this exchange

            • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              24 hours ago

              Who really lost? You perceive this back and forth as something that can be won or lost? Both you and I are arguing semantics from behind screens, not out risking our life and limb. There are no winners here.

      • supamanc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        You do though, because one the authorities start spinning their lies, there will be an element of doubt in everyone who has not seen this video.

        • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          An element of doubt? I can think critically. Can you not? The default thought hasn’t been ‘trust the authories’ for quite a while now. Rather the opposite.

          • supamanc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            If you hear two conflicting stories, without witnessing for yourself, there will always be an element of doubt. I’m not saying trust the authoritys, and I don’t know where you got that from. I’m saying you shouldn’t blindly believe what anyone says.

            • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I got it from the comment you wrote.

              because one the authorities start spinning their lies

              I haven’t suggested anything about blindly believing a singular source. My point is that a video source isn’t necessary for everyone.

    • answersplease77@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      im almost sure one of them shouted “gun…gun…” then they executed him 1 second later despite the fact that he was not reaching for it.

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Let’s break this down more.

        If we choose to believe he had a gun so what? You are legally allowed to carry a gun in this country. The presence of a gun is not a legal excuse to murder a person.

        Even if he had a gun he was being actively held down by several members of ICE. I don’t see how he could have drawn a weapon in that position. Regardless once they started beating him while he was on the ground he had every right to use deadly force to defend himself.

        So even if you believe what DHS has to say the video shows there is no scenario where the mere presence of a gun justifies their actions

        I rewatched the video and you can see his entire back, no weapon below the waist. If he had a gun in his hands they would have shot him on site. They’re just lying to us

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        Watch the video again.

        Tan beanie greenish coat guy pulls out a pistol and starts pistol whipping the guy.

        Grey coat sees this, and nopes the fuck out.

        Tan beanie stops pistol whipping him, readjusts his grip…

        Then his hand is block in the video and a single shot rings out, causing everyone else to flea before shooting the body.

        It really really looks like this guy just decides to escalate from pistol whipping a restrained and subdued man to shooting him in the head while multiple other people who didn’t know what was going on held the victim down.

        This is just inexplicably fucked.

        • notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          It wasn’t a pistol, it was a can of bear spray. Still horrible and not at all necessary, and no worse/better than a pistol imo. Just mentioning for clarification.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        A valid question but more likely that they dropped a gun, on purpose or by incompetence, then they freaked and murdered the guy.