• hopesdead@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If they turn out to be dead, that would be a shame. Can’t have the award. Secondly, that would make the committee look bad.

    EDIT: Just to be clear in case you are unaware, only people who are alive can qualify for an award.

    • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Well, that’s a rule that needs to fucking change.

      If someone can posthumously win an Oscar or a Grammy, why not a Nobel?

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        In theory, the Nobel’s prize money is meant to support the winners in future endeavours. So not much point if they’re dead. IIRC Nobel didn’t really intend it to be about fame and glory, it was meant to be supporting development in those fields the Nobels were allocated to.

      • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        I can see the point: if I’d done potentially Nobel-worthy work, I’d rather be honored while I’m alive—after I’m dead, they might as well award it to someone who can still appreciate it.

    • solrize@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Only living people can win the prize. If they die between the announcement and the ceremony they still get it posthumously. I’m pretty sure that has happened now and then.