• DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    That’s genuinely good enough for urban warfare, considering it’s less about what you can hit and more about how many other dudes are trying to do the same thing

    Too bad a lot of these guys are rural

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Depends on how “the government” fights, too. Guns don’t do shit against chemical warfare (tear gas etc.) or bombings. IMO, in a modern, developed state an insurgency can’t do shit if the military isn’t at least neutral, or they get support from foreign forces.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Myanmar is exactly the kind of country that made me specify “modern, developed state”. Their military ain’t shit compared to the US or most european countries.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            So you’re claiming something is impossible when there’s been zero popular revolts against your limited examples, mostly because no one running one has managed to fuck up that badly?

            Alright lol

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          if the “developed” nation doesn’t want to level the place because it’s either their place too or will result in many civilian casualties.

          You seem to have more trust in the Trump government than I do. They will absolutely go for mass civilian casualties if there’s a big insurgency in the US.