How are they going to do that if they are kidnapped and extreme renditioned to some concentration camp in another country?
So out of touch.
Majority of Americans do not have the finances, free time and connections to sue anyone they please. Not to mention, why are private party cases the solution to state actions?
Ham head.
Right. And even if we did all have civil rights lawyers on retainer, it still would not matter. The courts have decided that in almost all circumstances, federal agents have immunity for their actions, no matter how horrible. Torture? Assault? Sure thing, it’s all covered, your lawsuit will fail.
Heck, your lawyer already knows it will fail, so they won’t even file it.
That’s reality. There are no checks on federal agents, unless it’s identical to the one single case on file, Bivens. So you gotta pray that you live in Brooklyn and the Federal Bureau of Narcotics raids your house without a warrant. If that’s you, then you will win your lawsuit. Any other situation and you’re just fucked.
I think that is infact why he said this, also there is always going to be him saying no to all of it and wasting all that money. (i.e. soon to be the courts slush fund)
Class action is needed
Doesn’t matter. The courts have already granted the feds immunity for everything except for cases identical to Bivens. File as many lawsuits as you want, and you’ll just waste money on legal fees before losing them all.
I suspect he meant the working class, taking extra-judicial action.
He knows that… But as long as you can say there is a path… It makes all his Nazi bullshit okay in his mind
Come on Brett, you’re the fucking Supreme Court, are you that dense not to know the whole thing is a Fourth Amendment violation of the constitution, not just when the enforcement actions are violent? The lower courts had it all teed up, did their job and now you have perverted the concept of equal rights and freedoms for racialized minorities, all in a 10-page thing a couple second year law students could have written.
hes too drunk, so he spoke the truth
He just likes beer.
The constitution doesn’t have the word beer in it one single time, so Brett hasn’t read it.
The 18th and 21st amendments deal with beer so he may have read them. And the national pastime is enjoying the 2nd and 21st amendments simultaneously
Counterpoint:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and beer Arms, shall not be infringed.
its our god given right to play edward 40-hands
That doesn’t make sense. Is he drunk again?
When was he not drunk?
drunk
when hesgeth stops drinking.
Can’t be drunk again if you never stopped drinking.
The general assumption with the boofer on this question is “yes”, because HE LIKES BEER 😡
his answer to, anything alcohol related is yes.
He was just in the middle of having a DEVILS TRIANGLE WITH SQUEEEEEE
WOOOOOOOOOOO BEEEEER
Let’s get this guy on a campus speaking tour!
Hopefully your lawyer knows what state (or country) you were sent to.
