Jesus was for sure a foot guy.
And a guy guy. Maybe a bi guy.
Iirc there is a hypothesis in biblical interpretation that the Hebrew word for “feet” sometimes functions as a euphemism for dick. Though that wouldn’t apply to the Greek scriptures.
That doesn’t stop theologians for claiming “aramaisms” as a convenient excuse for parts of the Bible that are theologically inconvenient. The classic example is the Catholic doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary, which is seemingly contradicted by the Gospels’ many references to Jesus having brothers. Catholic theologians claim that the term brothers actually refers to cousins because in Aramaic the term for brothers can mean cousins in some contexts even though the Greek term is not ambiguous. This type of mix up doesn’t seem to occur outside of the Gospels but that doesn’t stop people from claiming it.
guess asexuals aren’t fully human
I mean. The Lord said.
sry :/
what if he was ace not that asexuals are fully human but what if they are
I happen to know by divine revelation: he was fully boobs man, fully ass man
I’m disappointed there’s nobody here so far proudly standing and saying, “ASS, YOU FOOLS!” So I’m stepping forward. Boobs are wonderful, but dat aaassss doe.
Also an unmarried rabbi of his age at that time was really unusual.
There are no people who don’t have sexual desires, obviously
Asexuals: am I a joke to you?
Strong desires for garlic bread
So not vampires, but have we ruled out werewolves?
Guess dragons can also be werewolves?
Scary dragon turns into a wolf on the full moon, becoming significantly less of a threat.
They are the joke to Catholics
Isn’t this Ace erasure?
Eraceure
No, because all aces are born fully gods.
It is a very cishet perspective.
Gays and trans have no sexual urges confirmed
feet. definitely feet.
BTW the character under the comment is Joshua Graham aka the Burned Man, if you can’t guess based off the name the character is Mormon or Mormon derived at least. But if my understanding of Mormon theology is correct he would be of the opinion that Jesus fucks.
We can’t expect God to do all the cooming
Fucking, when done righteously, is a chore like any other.
IDK who down voted you but you got a solid snort from me.
I mean based on Mary Magdalene, I’d assume feet.
I would watch a Tarantino bible movie
*Rolls big stone away* (rest of script like Kill Bill)
Or he could be just asexual, that’s a thing too.
boobs…or ass…
just because you hate to eat pumpkin pie doesn’t mean you don’t understand what your preference is between with and without whipped cream.
I don’t even try to eat pumpkin pie. I have no clue how to even compare whipped cream vs no whipped cream.
I have no clue how to even compare whipped cream vs no whipped cream.
Do you like whipped cream?
Sure, but I wouldn’t put it on my vegetables.
Can’t say if I’d like it on pumpkin pie without trying pumpkin pie.(I do actually want to try pumpkin pie, but I’ve never seen one before)
Where are you from if you don’t mind me asking?
Pumpkin Pie is one of those things that you just have to experience to know if you like it. If you do try it I highly recommend it with Whipped Cream. Chances are if you like whipped cream than you will like the combo.
Australia. We don’t even sell canned pumpkin here, so I’d have to make one completely from scratch. Not opposed to doing that one day though, just to see what the fuss is about.
I’ve never done that myself, but after looking it up it doesn’t seem like it would be extremely difficult, but I’ve gotten used to making things from scratch though so ymmv.
I don’t want to hype it up too much, If I’m being honest the first slice of Pie I will get at thanksgiving is usually a cherry pie, and I’ll get Pumpkin if I left room for seconds. That being said it’s just not fall/ thanksgiving around here without at least one slice of the stuff. I like it but I imagine the brown sugar, cinnamon, ginger, and nutmeg probably has as much to do with it as the pumpkin itself.
One thing I do know about baking them is that, unlike the ones you buy to make into Jack-O-Lanterns, you want to get a relatively small one- they actually grow varieties of pumpkin specifically for cooking with here, but I doubt that you could get one down there if y’all aren’t used to eating them. I think you would be fine just getting the smallest ones you can find. (2 Kilos or less preferably).
I’ll make you a deal, if you do it I will do it too, and post pictures of the result :)
If you do, make sure to retain the seeds and toast them. (It’s tradition, and they’re known to be a good source of magnesium, fiber, zinc, iron and a whole host of other nutrients and antioxidants.) Note that is the basic bitch recipe and you can do a lot of fun things with them. I like tossing them with Cajun seasoning as an example.
I don’t think so? But I assume the same for the pie itself. And who knows how it would be together (most people, but not me) - some things are bad by themselves but good with certain things. And if the option is for a smaller piece with whipped cream, that might be less bad than a full sized piece without cream.
I don’t think so?
You’ve never tried it or you just aren’t sure if you liked it?
But I assume the same for the pie itself.
You never know, some things don’t sound like they would be good but then you try them anyway and it turns out to be fantastic. There are very few things I will not at least try once before deciding its not for me. Hell sometimes I’ll try a food I’ve already tried once before and didn’t like it, and occasionally I am pleasantly surprised
And if the option is for a smaller piece with whipped cream, that might be less bad than a full sized piece without cream.
I believe that is what GreenKnight23 was getting at. Most people know whether or not they like whipped cream. If you did like it and were ‘forced’ to try a slice of pumpkin pie- well at minimum you will get something you do like along with something you don’t like. If you don’t like whipped cream, then you wouldn’t want it on your pumpkin pie slice because then you could possibly be eating two things you didn’t like.
You’ve never tried it or you just aren’t sure if you liked it?
Pretty certain I did as a child, but not if even then I considered it a neutral or a negative? Certainly wasn’t something I had a positive opinion of.
You never know, some things don’t sound like they would be good but then you try them anyway and it turns out to be fantastic. There are very few things I will not at least try once before deciding its not for me. Hell sometimes I’ll try a food I’ve already tried once before and didn’t like it, and occasionally I am pleasantly surprised
Yeah. I meant “I assume the same for the pie itself” as a sort of self-criticism because I get its not a reasonable assumption.
Anyways, my main point was more about the original topic. I’m not even sure how I would possibly rate them? What am I even trying to rate them on? People’s attraction to both left me wondering if people were just lying about it (and perhaps sexual attraction more broadly) because it was beyond me comprehension that would could actually care for either.
Anyways, my main point was more about the original topic.
Yeah, kind of got hung up on the food aspect. Sorry about that. (I love food).
I’m not even sure how I would possibly rate them? What am I even trying to rate them on? People’s attraction to both left me wondering if people were just lying about it (and perhaps sexual attraction more broadly) because it was beyond me comprehension that would could actually care for either.
I think it’s just hard for people like us to imagine what that is like. Much like how the thought crossed your mind that maybe people are lying about sexual attraction- I think the reverse is also true. I think most people when they hear the word ‘asexual’ think the person just means that they have a very low sex drive- not that they are totally and completely unable to feel sexual attraction.
I have a hard time wrapping my head around it myself. I knew I was a boobs and ass man long before I ever reached puberty. Sexual desire is such a integral part of my life that it would be no less confusing if you said you never got hungry or never felt pain.
I think Jesus was a myth, but if we are running the thought experiment that Jesus was real and he was pious because he was asexual- that seems a bit like cheating to me. The reason that people have such a hard time following all of Christianities silly sexual rules is because most people do have sexual desires. It’s like being impressed that someone who never feels hunger hasn’t eaten in 30 days or someone who never feels pain walking over hot coals. Technically they did the thing- but it’s not the same.
Neither. Cock.
Not mutually exclusive, but okay.
tfw you will never see the gay porno about Jesus
they hid his true lineage from the history books