• BabyVi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Imaginary friends used to require atleast some modicum of creativity.

      • EldenLord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Right? If you told someone from the past that we outsourced imagination to computers, they‘d think we live in a dystopia! Oh, wait…

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        We’re far more than that. We are having a conversation, transmitting our thoughts through space and time. It’s like telepathy, really. Word salad machines could never pull that off.

  • jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 days ago

    Never use AI for friendship, it’s like admitting you only want yes-men in your life. I don’t want to be around anyone who uses AI for emotional support.

    • Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s so much more effective when you keep things as neutral as possible. I will often ask it to tear apart my argument as though I am my opponent and use its tendency to align with the user against itself.

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        A fellow contrarian I see. I actually hate when it agrees with me so I look for holes.

    • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      You would have better luck with a dating sim then AI as emotional support. Might inspire you to make a real friend.

    • themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Honestly the more I read, the more I think that AI shouldn’t have been invented. Humanity is heading in the same direction as the machine stops short story.

  • EldenLord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 days ago

    I smell a finance bubble bursting in the near future tbh. Rather be prepared sooner than later.

      • EldenLord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        I think it will break sooner, but the real impact will happen after midterms so it can be “fake news” without threatening 🍊 Cheetolini‘s presidency

          • EldenLord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Depends on whether they can declare martial law. It‘s likely, but can‘t happen too unprovoked because this would give figures like Newsom too much ammo against Trump. Project 2025 doesn‘t care though

  • T156@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    Honestly, that should have been for the better. If it’s meant to be a tool, I would much rather it behave like a tool, rather than trying to be my best friend, or an evil vizier trying to give me advice.

    The fact that people got so attached to what is essentially a text generation algorithm that they were mourning its “death” is worrying, especially when it’s one that OpenAI has proven themselves to be more than able to modify as they wish.

    Just as concerning is OpenAI rolling back the update to make their model “friendlier”, or that people were clamouring hand over fist to throw money at the company in the hopes of getting their “friend” back.

    That can’t possibly be good news, especially when the shareholders find out that they have an iron grip over a portion of their users.

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    You know… if this wasn’t an “AI specific blunder” we’d probably spend some time talking about how uniquely incompetent Altman has been as a someone running a business.

  • MashedTech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    “will spend trillions of dollars on data centers” Hurray!

    It’s not enough that the planet is dying. They’re speeding it up as well!

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    your company doesnt look like it has a trillion. maybe apple , google can expand a little, or nvidia, but they surely arent going to build more.

  • Auth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    166
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    “we fucked up our massive new generation product launch… oh well lets invest trillions in new data centers” How do investors keep falling for this shit.

    • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      How indeed. It’s probably a multi-factor phenomenon which requires an anthropological study for a serious answer. (Good luck trying to get the necessary access to study them.) My guess for one factor in this, is that they have more money than they know what to do with.

    • MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Don’t they have enough?!? How about they fix and optimize their fancy autocompletion software instead?

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        They took a path they believed would develop into something, and it’s a narrow alley they can’t turn around in. They have to keep going with more compute and power to continue the chase. Thing is, everyone else seemingly thought they were onto something and followed as well, so they’re all in the same predicament where reversing course is suicide. So they hope they can keep selling the dream a bit longer until something happens.

        To be fair, it’s a lot more than just autocomplete. But it’s a lot less than what they wanted by now too.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          vibe innovation, they are the ones that think AI will be innovative in science by spontaneous generating of new science discoveries, without “researchers, labs, papers”

          • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            I have seen some people talk like that, and it strikes me as a religion. There’s euphoria, zeal, hope. To them AGI is coming to usher in heaven on earth. Singularity is like rupture.

            Sam Altman is one of the preachers of this religion.

      • Auth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 days ago

        Fix and optimize? Thats way harder than using VC money to buy more things.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        Don’t they have enough?!?

        No no, it’s just 1 more data center bro, then we’ll fix the hallucinations, promise bro!

    • Artisian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s a pretty clear humble-brag, no? The launch was only botched because people loved the previous personality; it’s an estimate of how much people care about the product and how much price gouging they could do later.

      No it wasn’t good for OpenAI. But I doubt it changed many investor minds.

    • NoodlePoint@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      How do investors keep falling for this shit.

      The ROI and the supposed savings from getting rid of the human side of technical support but also efforts of human creatives.

    • Marthirial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Because they already know that once the AI shitbubble bursts, they will switch all the GPUs to start mining Bitcoin and keep grifting the mouth breathers believing all these horseshit.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        moving back to CRYPTO after it already crashed, and only people investing in it are the ones that are easily scammed; conservatives,old people.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      He’s saying the launch was done badly because some users are in love with GPT-4 and it should not be removed. From a point of view of a investor having people addicted to your product is a good thing.