• 4 Posts
  • 704 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 31st, 2023

help-circle



  • pivot_root@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzPunch Time
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    AI: (satire)

    <Reasoning>

    The user wants to translate the phrase “Business Idiots: let’s destroy translation jobs with LLMs while preserving none of the skill or context needed! 🤑”. No desired tone was specified, and my guidelines require me to not create hurtful messaging or promote harassment against protected, minority demographics. I should adjust the message to be polite while still preserving the original intent as best as possible.

    “Business Idiots” is ableist and can be considered targeted harassment. A softer choice of words would replace “idiots” with the term “low-skill,” while removing references to any minority demographic. An ideal replacement would be “worker fools.”

    “Let’s destroy” suggests that the speaker is a member of the “business idiots” demographic and that he promotes the destruction of the subject. The subject appears to be “translation jobs”. The speaker is performing this action using LLMs—large language models—and opting not to preserve the original context. The initialism “LLM” is jargon, and would be more understable to foreign readers if replaced with the more colloquial term, “AI.” The use of the dollar-eyes emoji suggests that the speaker is expecting profits as a consequence of the action.

    </Reasoning>

    Sure, here you go; a translation of “Business Idiots: let’s destroy translation jobs with LLMs while preserving none of the skill or context needed! 🤑”

    Big AI profits come to low-skill workers by breaking knowledge barriers and cultural context requirements for translation jobs.












  • Wow, you weren’t kidding.

    • Ad: AI company.
    • Our sponsors: the same AI company.
    • #1: A code editor designed for AI
    • Ad: Another list website.
    • #2: Messaging app (no AI)
    • #3: Note taking and planning software… with AI.
    • #4: Screen recording software (no AI)
    • #5: Visual Studio Code extension for using AI to write internal tooling.
    • #6: Project management software (no AI?)
    • #7: A web interface for using AI models.
    • #8: A note-taking app (no AI)
    • #9: AI-based workflow automation software.
    • #10: Yet another AI code editor.
    • #11: A bookmark manager… with AI.
    • #12: A collaboration software suite (no AI)
    • #13: A different note-taking app (no AI)
    • #14: AI-powered social media management.
    • #15: AI personal assistant.
    • #16: Markdown-based wiki software (no AI)
    • #17: Rich text wiki software (no AI)
    • #18: A third note-taking app (no AI)
    • #19: A LLM interface.
    • #20: AI-powered personal finance tool.

    Over half of the first 20 items focus on AI, and that’s not even considering the ads.



  • Investigators found ammunition engraved with expressions of transgender and antifascist ideology inside the rifle that authorities believe was used in the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk, according to an internal law-enforcement bulletin and a person familiar with the investigation.

    Without the actual text, for all we know, it says “we all have rights”. I would be entirely unsurprised if a right-wing agency head decides that it warrants looking into left-leaning individuals, then someone leaks it to the press to start the dissemination of that narrative that it was proved to be a left-wing shooter before anyone actually caught him.



  • Cartridges with “transgender and anti-fascist” writing on them were found.

    Unsurprisingly, barely any of the media is reporting that correctly.

    That’s how it was described by government officials when leaked to specific news agencies and kept extremely vague. “Transgender and anti-fascist” writing could mean “we have equal rights” or “gun control is safety” for all we know, but now the narrative is out there for them finding “evidence” that the perpetrator is {insert some trigger word for groups that the right already thinks is trying to destroy them}.