Dem governors would line up to oppose him.
Do you have any reason other than your own expectations to believe this is true? Looking at their response to him so far I don’t think they would do shit. I don’t think I would have said that two years ago but their spinelessness up to this point is pretty shocking.
Walz hasn’t done much of anything about ICE invading Minnesota and Newsom types his Twitter posts like an idiot now. What else have any of them done?
If we can only comprehend war in economic terms then we have already lost everything that makes a society worth preserving.
Maybe. Either way it’s an insane thing for the POTUS to say. The best case scenario is that he’s so full of shit that he makes other insane politicians seem tame by comparison. That’s not a good place for the US or the world to be, to say nothing of any other possible scenarios.
“The bombings will continue until peace is achieved” is an actual quote from Trump
You’re welcome to your opinions on the topic but I don’t think you can refute anything I said. Desperate people often get violent and there are a lot of desperate people out there. That’s just the state of the world.
You make good points but when politicians don’t listen to people and those people get desperate they also get violent. If politicians didn’t want to get shot at they shouldn’t have created a world in which that sounds like a good idea to damn near half the population. Actions have consequences and the people in charge have been ignoring problems for a long time. Sooner or later that’s going to bite them in the ass in one way or another.
It would be faster to list the things she hasn’t done to me
Dan said he’s looking for a gf. I’m sure Will is nice but he’s not invited
I don’t. I hope they ship his body to every city in America like they do with ancient Egyptian kings, except instead of learning about history we take turns pissing in his mouth
Nice, I like your points and your style
I’m interested
Hey! Punctuation involves more than commas. Did you know that?
For the sake of argument let’s say he did that and intentionally slowed things down as much as possible.
Fast forward four years from now. You’re a DOJ prosecutor under the new administration looking to level charges against high ranking military officers who gave the green light to some of Trump’s war crimes.
How could you tell the Army Chief of Staff did what he could to prevent those crimes? He didn’t resign. He didn’t publicly denounce the actions or refuse to pass the orders down the chain of command (if he did he would have been canned). He didn’t give his story to a journalist or recommend to Congress that Trump be impeached. In the eyes of the law what is the difference between him and the General he relays the President’s orders to, or the soldier who carries them out?
I agree that he’s not capable of seeing himself as inferior but I think he could tell that Obama viewed him as inferior and others were agreeing with that
I don’t know, I tend to believe the theory that Trump ran for President because Obama made fun of him at that correspondents dinner. He looked pretty humiliated that night
Maybe, but this reasoning implies the SC isn’t gargling Trump’s balls and that seems like an incorrect conclusion to me
I use a pic of your wife’s pussy too
You used AI to explain a joke to you? Bruh
That’s overly dramatic phrasing and you know it. Adding this kind of hyper technical quip to a thread aimed at beginners is insane. Stop doing that.
When will this idea die? If anyone is still on the fence about Trump they are a lost cause. I don’t mean that in the internet edgelord sense but a literal one. Stop wasting time on idiots and people happily guzzling propaganda. They will never ever change. Give up on them. They want to physically harm you.