fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoDots!mander.xyzimagemessage-square94fedilinkarrow-up1833arrow-down18
arrow-up1825arrow-down1imageDots!mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square94fedilink
minus-squarepurplemonkeymad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 day agoAccording to your table, it’s not as bad as that, just not a good idea. E: Wait, missread that as thorium.
minus-squareArtemisimetrA@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·21 hours agoThe fact that Thorium and Uranium are just “probably not a good idea” makes me think that the scale is based on licking like an ore that contains them rather than the pure element
minus-squareandros_rex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoI’m pretty sure I could get away with licking my uranium ore sample. Not going to test it apropos of nothing though. A lot of those trans-uranium (and astatine) aren’t going to exist in lick-able quantities anyway.
According to your table, it’s not as bad as that, just not a good idea. E: Wait, missread that as thorium.
The fact that Thorium and Uranium are just “probably not a good idea” makes me think that the scale is based on licking like an ore that contains them rather than the pure element
I’m pretty sure I could get away with licking my uranium ore sample. Not going to test it apropos of nothing though.
A lot of those trans-uranium (and astatine) aren’t going to exist in lick-able quantities anyway.