

If I didn’t exist I would also fail at the job I had been given.


If I didn’t exist I would also fail at the job I had been given.


I checked and this does a similar thing. You can use WG to punch out a connection, and I have before. The linked program uses quic in a similar way to WG but doesn’t do any of the routing, just registers the connection to a hostname for application level forwarding.
It looks more that it provides an easy setup for an alternative.
Both methods can work on cg-nat as well since you are punching out.


You mean you don’t write it on a piece of paper then place it in a room that is barricaded from the inside, but still accessible by a securius route through the building filled with environmental puzzles and enemies? The barricade should also be convenient to move from inside the room for fast return to your computer.
I would always mention that key whenever someone did the alt-f4 tirck. Half the time it got the person trying to trick others.


Wow, I guess that makes sense. But if they were going to move to a significant count of Linux machines I would assume that an enterprise edition (like red hat) would probably be covered by insurance. Since they then have someone to blame.


We have had success with this on port 443 and it appears to do a good job on networks that only allow browsing. Usual problems with TCP based VPN still apply.


When accessing yt make sure you always update to nightly, stable take too long to get the updates.
–update-to nightly


No it will be to do with federation, you’re on the same instance as the community so will always get it as part of your pool of posts. No one on my instance has a sub to it so I don’t see any posts for it.


It’ll be the same reason as for me I think, no one on shit just works has subbed to it, so nothing is federated to your instance.


0 posts for me, I guess no one subs to it (for apparently clear reasons.)


I saw this on a few sysadmin posts, from what I saw and what people described I have a theory that it was an unexpected interaction.
Those with the deletion had a expiration date for the donation licenses past the July '26 deadline. That shouldn’t have happened as far as I can tell from the notification email. We had some of these, but I think the difference was the presence of other licenses.
Those with only the 10 donations and none of the other free licenses, would have become unlicensed when they were removed. There is a cool off for deletions, but if the licence had the wrong expiration, then the deadline date might have been set from the original expiration. Due to the incorrect extension that date might then have been in the past. Leading to the wrong deletions.
I have no way to confirm any of that and ms are not going to admit it. I don’t think it was malicious, but is still a appalling show from Microsoft.


I’ve told people that it’s a percentage but they have a hard time understanding that and insisted on doing it from the serving size still.


If it was only 1500 then I think it would have rounded to one calorie.


Honestly so much better when they moved away from the “everything is a floating window” interface. I can find stuff now.


It converts it from being something someone said, into something you can point at and say “we have evidence of it happening.”


I would avoid giving it internet access. You could probably get away with network access, but id still mainly restrict it to a disconnected network and just download anything you need for it from a modern machine. (Probably a shared nas for transfer.) If you’ve got a good router (ie not a isp or home router) you could give it access to specific items on a whitelisting basis.


My first thought was, is the hose and weight obstructed below the sink? Had the same issue but it was just some stuff that had been pushed too far back.


I’m guessing the cameras track your gaze, and they use that to decide what people are most interested in.


I’ve legitimately had people use Pascal’s wager and then say that the basilisk is nonsense. So I guess you could include Christianity in this too.
Sounds like the whole thing was just a way for them to extract training costs from roofers.