• Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Due to how capitalism works, every purchase you make helps fund oppression. That’s how the system was designed: to ensure those in power who wish to oppress will ensure wealth is funnelled into their pockets through their convoluted system of ownership.

    If it isn’t Harry Potter media that tangentially funds Rowling through royalties it is something else that funds another bigoted owner somewhere along the supply chain of the rest of the items you purchase in your life.

    You really give a shit about this? Then direct your criticisms at the convoluted system that forces people to give up the things they enjoy because some bigot holds a piece of paper that says they own an idea.

    This production has nothing to do with JK except for the fact she has a piece of paper that entitles her to reimbursement. That’s the problem, not the people simply trying to make a living or people indulging in media that they enjoy.

        • Taleya@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          yeah yeah we all live in a society, you’re extra deep, we know the schtick. Not what we’re here for

        • drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          We’re doing what we can, and that’s a whole lot more valuable than sitting around and talking about what we should do when we can’t at the moment.

          Please, tell us your plan to dismantle capitalism that requires us to blindly consume Harry Potter media.

          Just because there’s an underlying issue doesn’t mean that it’s pragmatic to hyperfocus on it and ignore the more immediate issues. If I have cancer, I’m not gonna stop eating fruit because I really need to focus on fighting the cancer and my other health-conscious activities need to be put on hold. That’s not how responding to problems works.

        • eskimofry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          if they missed your point you should feel the urge to be more clear. Not act holier than thou

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Sorry but I really don’t follow. Are you saying we shouldn’t boycot and socially cancel products created by bigots?

      There’s so much entertainment and its honestly kinda sad that people would sacrifice their moral and justice stance for sake of “comfort consumption”. Ew.

      • spacesatan@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yes that’s their point. “no ethical consumption under capitalism” There are no degrees of evil or complicity, shut up and let me continue to not think about what I’m paying for when I buy nestle chocolate. You can’t be perfect so trying to cause less harm is just a distraction.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Eh disagree with this weakling mindset. It is our duty to be responsible and caring citizens even in systems you disagree with.