• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah, because it’ll tie budgets up for ten years building it, and in the meantime all the fossil fuel people can tap those final nails into our coffin while they line their pockets.

    • leisesprecher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ten years? More like twenty. Hinkley point C was started in 2013, supposed to be finished 2023. This year the estimation was corrected to 2029-2031.

      • Womble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Counterpoint: UAE went from zero nuclear energy to producing as much as Denmark or Portugal produce renewables in ten years. From a base of zero nuclear expertise in the country.

        • leisesprecher@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          And we all know that the UAE are the international beacon of safety, worker’s rights, rule of law and cost effectiveness.

          That’s a really bad argument. That’s like saying the Soviet Union was really good at digging canals.

          • Womble@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            So existing examples that go against your argument dont count because you dont like the country. OK.

            • leisesprecher@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              So countering your argument with counterarguments why your example is flawed isn’t allowed, because you’d need to reconsider?

              Tell me, do you really think the UAE are willing, not capable, willing to invest in safety and lawfulness as much as any even halfway free country?

              • Womble@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Its possible that it was built to a lower standard than would be expected in the west, both in terms of quality and worker safety. Though unless you have specific reports of that I dont see any reason just to assume it because Arabs bad.

                In addition this was largely built by Korean companies who have a successful record of building NPPs at home without incident, I imagine Korea wouldnt be particularly happy if their citizens (especially highly trained and economically productive ones) were being abused to build foreign infrastructure.

                The main point is that NPPs dont have to be stuck in a quagmire, and using Hinkley Point as a stand in for all NPP construction is disingenuous, just as using the UAE as a sole example would be.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      And even if they do finally build it, it’s still a centralized system that regulatory-captured monopoly utilities can gouge the public on.

      Solar and wind threaten them by being decentralized as well as by not relying on fossil fuels.

    • ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Moving transport entirely over to the energy grid is going to take more energy than we currently generate - who’d of thought!