Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前There you go little guyslrpnk.netimagemessage-square210fedilinkarrow-up11.13Karrow-down179
arrow-up11.06Karrow-down1imageThere you go little guyslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square210fedilink
minus-squareWordBox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up45arrow-down14·1 年前Source on speeding cameras working for anything other than revenue generation?
minus-squareHonytawk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up25arrow-down9·1 年前If that were the case, they would be hidden. They are a deterrent for speeding most of all.
minus-squareremotedev@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·1 年前The ones around here, everyone just slows down getting to that intersection, and then picks up speed again after crossing through
minus-squaredriving_crooner@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 年前That’s the main purpose of that cams. Slow drivers on strategic spots that have more chances of accidents.
minus-squareTachyonTele@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 年前That does make sense. Never thought of it that way.
minus-squareNurgus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 年前In the UK (Where the op picture is) the police cannot collect the revenue from cameras and other fines. It all goes to the gov so the cops have zero financial incentive to install speed cameras.
minus-squareNurgus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前Yes but they get the same amount regardless of the fines. The police see no direct financial connection.
minus-squareEvotech@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down3·1 年前https://www.cochrane.org/CD004607/INJ_do-speed-cameras-reduce-road-traffic-crashes-injuries-and-deaths
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·1 年前More crashes and deaths means less cars and people. Double win for the environment. Environmentalists should be encouraging speeding and drink driving.
minus-square Morphit @feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 年前You know the person who had the greatest positive impact on the environment on this planet? Genghis Khan, because he massacred forty million people.
minus-squarePrehensile_cloaca @lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 年前Leans into the window You think y’all can get this thing home?
minus-squareLaLuzDelSol@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down3·1 年前https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20927736/
minus-squareN-E-N@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 年前https://www.heraldnet.com/news/after-traffic-cameras-went-in-everett-saw-70-decrease-in-speeding/
Source on speeding cameras working for anything other than revenue generation?
If that were the case, they would be hidden.
They are a deterrent for speeding most of all.
The ones around here, everyone just slows down getting to that intersection, and then picks up speed again after crossing through
That’s the main purpose of that cams. Slow drivers on strategic spots that have more chances of accidents.
That does make sense. Never thought of it that way.
In the UK (Where the op picture is) the police cannot collect the revenue from cameras and other fines. It all goes to the gov so the cops have zero financial incentive to install speed cameras.
deleted by creator
Yes but they get the same amount regardless of the fines. The police see no direct financial connection.
deleted by creator
https://www.cochrane.org/CD004607/INJ_do-speed-cameras-reduce-road-traffic-crashes-injuries-and-deaths
More crashes and deaths means less cars and people.
Double win for the environment.
Environmentalists should be encouraging speeding and drink driving.
You know the person who had the greatest positive impact on the environment on this planet? Genghis Khan, because he massacred forty million people.
I have a treat for you
Leans into the window
You think y’all can get this thing home?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20927736/
https://www.heraldnet.com/news/after-traffic-cameras-went-in-everett-saw-70-decrease-in-speeding/