Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoDeliveryslrpnk.netimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1684arrow-down123
arrow-up1661arrow-down1imageDeliveryslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squarecheddar@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up87·2 months agoIt’s like removing a laugh track from an old sitcom.
minus-squareHugucinogens@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up18·edit-22 months agoIt’s better, because here the underlying pacing isn’t left ruined after the removal. Removing the laugh track leaves behind (hilariously) awkward gaps. This is what laugh track removal would look like in this case Actually kinda funny still, lol
minus-squareVindictiveJudge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 months agoAlso, depending on your definition of ‘old,’ that laugh track might be a live studio audience rather than canned laughter.
It’s like removing a laugh track from an old sitcom.
It’s better, because here the underlying pacing isn’t left ruined after the removal.
Removing the laugh track leaves behind (hilariously) awkward gaps.
This is what laugh track removal would look like in this case
Actually kinda funny still, lol
Also, depending on your definition of ‘old,’ that laugh track might be a live studio audience rather than canned laughter.