Alabama lawmakers on Thursday advanced legislation that could see librarians prosecuted under the state’s obscenity law for providing “harmful” materials to minors, the latest in a wave of bills in Republican-led states targeting library content and decisions.
The Alabama House of Representatives voted 72-28 for the bill that now moves to the Alabama Senate. The legislation comes amid a soaring number of book challenges — often centered on LGBTQ content — and efforts in a number of states to ban drag queen story readings.
“This is an effort to protect children. It is not a Democrat bill. It’s not a Republican bill. It’s a people bill to try to protect children,” Republican Rep. Arnold Mooney, the bill’s sponsor, said during debate.
The Alabama bill removes the existing exemption for public libraries in the state’s obscenity law. It also expands the definition of prohibited sexual conduct to include any “sexual or gender oriented conduct” at K-12 public schools or public libraries that “exposes minors to persons who are dressed in sexually revealing, exaggerated, or provocative clothing or costumes, or are stripping, or engaged in lewd or lascivious dancing, presentations, or activities.”
Public libraries should have little to no restrictions on books. Period. We can have all the warnings in the world but information whether it’s false or “dangerous” or doesn’t agree with my political philosophy should be free. They didn’t care about freedom and at this point Alabama should make this a ballot measure.
Public libraries should have little to no restrictions on books. Period.
So, in a private market for literature, public libraries have an enormous impact on who can profit from publication. A big part of this fight isn’t just prosecuting librarians, its controlling who gets to profit from bulk purchase of books.
They didn’t care about freedom and at this point Alabama should make this a ballot measure.
We’ve seen ballot measures functionally ignored in states like Florida and Ohio.
Here’s what some of those cases look like, from successful to unsuccessful efforts to alter the will of the people:
• In November 2023, Ohio voters passed an amendment to their state’s constitution protecting the right to abortion. Within a week, a group of Ohio Republican lawmakers declared the amendment to be invalid and introduced legislation that would strip state courts from having authority to rule on the issue of abortion. Ohio’s House speaker, Republican Jason Stephens, rejected the proposed legislation.
• In July 2018, Washington, D.C., voters approved an increase in the minimum wage for tipped workers. Three months later, the City Council repealed the initiative.
• In 2016, voters in South Dakota supported an initiative to revise campaign finance and lobbying laws and create an ethics commission. Gov. Dennis Daugaard signed a law repealing the initiative in February 2017. Another citizen initiative to create an ethics commission was on the ballot in 2018, but did not pass.
Not included in the article, but what always leaps to my mind is the 2018 Florida Felony Disenfranchisement Reform Amendment that was rejected by the state legislature and governor’s office a year later.
