Trump can have one more felony, as a treat

  • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    2 months ago

    Those children made " the ultimate sacrifice " to expand and maintain American imperialism and violence worldwide. Just because we hate trump there is no reason to defend the American empire and its willing enforcers.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ok, I’m not going to debate that with you. I don’t know these kids, their motivations, their missions, or how they lived and died. I’m talking about every body laid to rest in Arlington, and far too many that still lay where they fell, all of the soldiers, living and dead, are deserving of a certain modicum of reapect. They deserve to not be used as props in a campaign photo. Their families deserve to not see their tombstones used as an arm rest in a photo op.

      • raynethackery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would be horrified if someone asked to visit my parents’ grave for a photo op. I can barely go there without breaking down. My family’s grief is private.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Oh yes all those soldiers from, (checks notes), fighting the Nazis and Japanese.

      Yeah them. Horrible people, the absolute worst amiright?

      • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        This incident was with the parents of people in section 60 specifically for people dying post 9-11 “War on terror” soldiers in other words. Stop obfuscating.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh okay the ones who got rid of Saddam and helped Iraq hold free and fair elections?

          Those guys?

          • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Oh you are an Iraq war defender I’m not going to bother getting into an argument with you it’s not worth it to argue with someone literally defending the Iraq war as bringing “Democracy” to Iraq with all the current information freely available about the true motives and the lists of war crimes.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              Hey you’re talking about the soldiers. The guys who actually went over there. If you want to talk about Bush then talk about Bush. And the “list of war crimes” is just that, a list with a fraction of the people who served in Iraq.

              And yeah I’m going to talk about bringing democracy back to Iraq. Because that’s exactly what happened. Are you going to try and tell us they weren’t the first free and fair elections since Saddam seized power?

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                Let me guess, you were there and killed a bunch of people, and this is what you have to tell yourself in order to make it day to day.

                That sucks. But if you’re going to post publicly defending the Iraq War, then you better be ready for criticism.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I was there. And yeah Bush lied his ass off and got 4,000 of my friends killed. I’m incredibly bitter about that. But we also took Saddam out of power, and brought democracy back to Iraq. We were halfway through our peacekeeping period objectives when Bremer released his orders that gave life to the Iraqi insurgency and let AQ get a purchase in the country. But then we allied with those local militias to repair that situation too. And when ISIS reared it’s head we again supported Iraqi militias in their fight to secure their country.

                  It’s a far more complex situation than previous wars were. But the military did it’s best to actually stabilize the country, support the leadership the Iraqis voted for, and get out of the way as fast as possible. We just had to fight the white house the entire way because Cheney and friends were making billions of dollars on the services contracts for us being there.

                  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    We may have made the best of the situation when we were there, and obviously I don’t blame you for the evil decisions of the Bush administration, but I don’t know if anyone can justify going there in the first place.

                    Afghanistan? Ok sure. Maybe. Iraq? Nah

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Afghanistan may be among the most humanitarian deployments the US military has done. The infant mortality rate fell significantly while the US was there, and women had the freedom to go to school and participate in the economy without violent oppression.

        Our mistake in Afghanistan was that we didn’t build a lasting change. We gave arms to the wrong people. We should’ve been training and arming the women to fight back and protect their democracy. Not men who were going to be fine either way.

        • You have no Idea how much I agree with that statement.

          I am from Switzerland, where everyone has to serve. I always thought that this was a stabilizing factor in our country, since the military power in the country is also the democratic power in the country.

          So I never understood why they wouldn’t arm the very people who are most likely to be suppressed and instead arm the people who are likely to do the suppressing.

          Women would have been inspired for the cause, they would have been willing and motivated. The men apparently weren’t.