• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    4 months ago

    And, one needs to chase it down to humanely kill it.

    I hate to be the one to point this out buuut there’s an even more humane thing you could do. Y’know. Just saying.

    • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      If it’s anything like where I grew up, the deer population is massive and actually benefits from controlled culling. Also venison is delicious, and I know some hunters will literally give the extra meat away since a single deer has a lot of it, oftentimes to food pantries.

      Obligatory disclaimer: I’m leftist as fuck and actually prefer a low meat diet. But deer hunting does have benefits.

      • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        Exactly. They feed on the local crops and we can’t magically make wolves and coyotes appear. There’s many negative impacts of not hunting, including many car accidents. And, it’s meat raised on crops stolen from mega-corporations that are artificially inflating the cost of food.

        Once we take back the means of production and begin to heal the environmental cause of too much deer, I’ll stop hunting and eating them. Fair?

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        They actually hire professionals to shoot deer in some urban areas in Pennsylvania where they cause problems. Farmers hire professionals because of the massive crop damage they do. Hunters are free deer harvesters, in fact they pay to hunt them.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Deer are out of control because we hunted all the predators because meat farms needed to protect their product.

        You’ve slotted yourself into the place of natural predators, but that does not actually fix anything!

        • FireTower@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I think you’re underplaying the historical significance of wool and how agricultural lands for growing plants also played a massive role in destroying the habitat of those predators (toss in timber in there too).

        • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes and now it’s on the citizens to take the place of those missing natural predators - the meat farms sure aren’t going to do it, especially by your logic.

          You kind of just talked yourself into a circle.

        • FireTower@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          Let me clarify because apparently it wasn’t obvious. My stance is that industrial raised livestock often experience poor quality living conditions. Hunting offers a death far less insufferable than most deer would see otherwise, and a regulated harvest is critical in areas that deer’s natural predators have been extirpated like much of the populated US. Without this populations would bloom past the carrying capacity of the ecosystem leading to disease, famine, and increased death on both parties in auto accidents.

          The people eating venison are swapping it in for a steak not a salad. People make jokes about vegans because of individuals who don’t acknowledge that animal welfare isn’t a binary matter but one on a spectrum. Painting it as a binary simply dissuades non vegans from taking any incremental step to increasing their welfare.