• CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think there was a Law & Order episode where the defense essentially said they should be tried separately, but at the same time in different court rooms.

      And the idea was that the defense made the facts show that the spouse did the crimes. They both got non-guilty verdicts because there was enough reasonable doubt.

      I know L&O is fiction but I have to imagine someone has tried this and succeeded.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        I know L&O is fiction but I have to imagine someone has tried this and succeeded.

        I’d say it’s more likely than you think, many L&O episodes take inspiration from real life cases.

      • Artyom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        My university had a jury system for people who cheated on tests and someone almost pulled that same strategy off. One of the admins serves on both trials though and figured it out. They just got unlucky honestly, it was a 1/3rd chance they’d both get the same admin.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          What happened next? Seems like they’d have the prisoner’s dilemma at that point.

          • Artyom@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            At the one I didn’t attend, the professor showed up and corroborated the student’s story. They didn’t happen at the same time, the guilty one was the one I attended and she went second.