• k2r@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    48 minutes ago

    What’s even stranger in French is we have adjective like “aqueux”

  • Axolotl@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I wonder when French took the wrong path, because it seems unexplainable to me how we end up from Latin’s “aqua” to French’s “eau”

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      One plausible etymology is:

      aqua > agua > egua > ewa > ewe > eawe > eaw > eau > o

      So first the k sound changed to a g, then the initial a became an e, which lengthened to a diphthong, the final sound disappeared, the new final sound turned from a consonant into a vowel (like an oo) and the resulting triphthong reduced to a monophthong.

      The elision of medial g is pretty surprising to me though.

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Are you sure that the Q is supposed to be read like a K? It does not seem to be the case in other neo-latin languages such as Italian and IIRC Spanish

        Edit: i searched and it seems that the sound of Q could’ve been /kʷ/ which makes sense

        i am not a latin expert– i barelly know it in fact, btw

        • FishFace@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Yes, Latin qu was pronounced /kʷ/, which became straight /kw/ in English. I don’t know which it was in Old French. Italian does have qu which is pronounced /kw/.

  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    This is pretty much my experience attempting to learn french. I can’t pronounce it worth a damn either.

    Bout ready to toss it out, say fuck it, and switch to Italian.