It’s funny because I think I can see what Krash was trying to say, but remains too stupid to elucidate.

What I think her meant was that some persons involved in bestiality were victims of someone else forcing them into such acts, and that those persons shouldn’t be denied employment because of it.

Now I didn’t believe for a second that that circumstance has ever come up before and think that his inability to look past Trump’s big fat diaper (and his own gross incompetence) left him unable to come up with a better excuse.