Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was personally and explicitly warned that Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar was planning a major attack roughly 10 days before the October 7 massacre, but dismissed the threat and did not alert his security chiefs, according to a shocking new Haaretz report.

The revelations come from research for an upcoming book Hostages: 843 Days of Abandonment, written by journalists Shlomi Eldar and Ruth Yuval, who writes for Haaretz.

  • kingofras@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    My response is the same as the one you responded to. There’s no point to this. No matter what I write back. You’re inside a truth bubble, and you can’t see outside of it. I’m in mine and I’ve seen yours and I don’t want to be in that one either.

    Only when you flick a switch inside your head my response might make more sense, but you don’t want that because your brain isn’t built that way. And that makes you beautifully normal and most definitely not a consipiracy theorist. The most important part is that we converse, do it civily and accept our differences and that it takes people like you and people like me to make this world whole.

    Take care my friend, live your best life.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      There’s no point to this. No matter what I write back. You’re inside a truth bubble, and you can’t see outside of it. I’m in mine and I’ve seen yours and I don’t want to be in that one either.

      Well maybe if you didn’t refuse to engage in good faith debate and had an iota of objectivity you wouldn’t require concepts like “truth bubbles” to maintain your point of view.

      Only when you flick a switch inside your head my response might make more sense, but you don’t want that because your brain isn’t built that way.

      No, I understand what you are attempting to claim, you’re just wrong. You are wrong and you refuse to defend your claims because failing to do so would force you to confront your own biases.

      The most important part is that we converse, do it civily and accept our differences and that it takes people like you and people like me to make this world whole.

      No. We don’t have different perspectives because we are inherently different. We have different perspectives because you are ignorant and choose to remain so because it suits your perspective.

      Stop wasting my time writing this quasi intellectual motif of vaguely spiritual and overtly patronizing trash.

      If you want to discuss the topic objectively, ill gladly discuss it with you. If you want to go on odd metaphysical tangents in the attempt to avoid scrutiny you can fuck right off.