• Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      But Goog map added “Gulf of America” under the Gulf of Mexico while MapQuest retain the Gulf of Mexico, so even when it has changed for USA MapQuest basically saying they won’t follow.

      • TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Again, not that they won’t follow, it’s that the name hasn’t changed. Trump can do what he likes and he can probably force the executive branch to use the name in official documentation, but other than that this stunt means nothing

        • John@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Hi, I work in the map industry. We generally don’t get to decide what names to use for features. We apply what the local official name is (to simplify). That’s why if you’re in country A, feature X might be named something different than if you’re in country B. You can imagine this would (and has) caused many conflicts around the world if we didn’t display the local official name. (Switch your region via VPN and you can see this in action)

          If Google renamed it to Gulf of America, no Google didn’t, not really … They just inserted the new official name for that feature according to GNIS.

        • Blibly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          And Google are a bunch of evil techdicks so of course they suck up to the orange fuhrer.

    • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah, I’m pretty sure the United States can’t change the name of a body of water that’s shared between multiple countries. If it’s not that, it still hasn’t gotten any sort of congressional approval.
      Edit: Lake Michigan is the only one that’s fully within the US. The others are patrolled by both the US Coast Guard and the Canadian Coast Guard, both have the ability to arrest anyone on either side of the border. The state governments that border the lakes have some power over them, but they’re held in trust for public use. The International Joint Commission resolves any disputes regarding them. I’m not quite sure what would have to go into changing the name of Lake Ontario, but it would at least require Canadian approval and US congressional approval, perhaps even approval from the state of New York and the province of Ontario. Oh yeah, this is also completely stupid and should under no circumstances actually happen.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        That sounds nice.

        If Trump really wants to turn the screws, he can make it a requirement of federal contracts that all contractors use maps that comply with his infantile demmands.

        I think you’re kind of living in a pre-Trump reality where laws and procedures means something. It’s a super bad idea to feel comfortable with this administration because something they want to do is technically illegal. Everything is up for grabs right now.

      • chunk6235@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m pretty sure the United States can’t change the name of a body of water that’s shared between multiple countries.

        Someone forgot about the GuLf Of AmErIcA already

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    You know, I never really considered automatic anti-vandalism mechanisms we have in place on OpenStreetMap, but they surely exist.

    All that to say I think we’re good on OSM too. lol

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    so annoying the local news mentions. this only applies in within the boarders of amerca. no. no it doesn’t. executive orders are directions to the federal government. Its basicaly a memo to the agencies that they have to do that but no state or local government or private individual need follow it and I imagine most federal workers just avoid dealing with something now with the name of the lake. Once again I can’t wait for the next president to make an executive order changing the name of donald trump.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      You assume we will ever have another president.

      But if we are allowed an election I’d vote for someone who made that part of their platform.

  • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Please change it. I have more information than the public does on the Epstein files. Change it to the lake that divides the child rapist protection agencies from the child rapist enabling agencies. Canadian conservatives are just as involved.