• dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    To be fair. A historical Jesus person might have never existed. But, several authors of books in the Bible did. They were probably several con men who realized that they could collaborate to coalesce their respective cults by coopting the prophecies of Jewish religion. Thus gaining more power. The strategy took off and even today Christianity survives by pure syncretism. Absorbing groups and beliefs to stay palatable to the widest audience possible. Same strategy that has proven successful for mormoms, which are basically Christian fanfic.

    As the old adage says, the difference between a cult and a religion is the number of members.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    There is no doubt in my mind that Jesus was a cult leader who pissed off the authorities and got himself into trouble. He tore families apart and caused great strife to those around him during those times.

    Being charitable and assuming that much of what he did was good and has been misreported since, it is a shame that a genuine cult took over after his reported death. The fact that this became a worldwide religion is horrific and has set back human development by millennia.

    • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Iirc is defined by size.

      If the biggest religions were only believed by a few hundred/thousand people they’d be treated like nothing more than the cults they are.

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Unfortunately, we know so little about the person whom the biblical Jesus is based on that it would be really hard to say. Keep in mind that the myths about him in the Christian bible were written well after he was claimed to have died.

    The earliest written of the Gospels is likely Mark. And it may have been written by someone with either first or second hand knowledge of Jesus, around 70 CE. Which would be a few decades after the claimed death of Jesus. So, the author (or authors) were dealing with memories at least a few decades old. And they were likely an adherent to this messianic cult, which means they were not exactly objective in their writing.

  • IWW4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I have never heard anyone say Jones, Koresh or Hubbard were mentally ill. They were very talented con artists.

    • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They go hand in hand. Narcissistic personality disorder plus antisocial personality disorder is what makes them so charismatic.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Probably not; he didn’t try to start a religion.

    A better question would be around Moses.

    Paul of Tarsus had a lot to say about appearing to be mentally ill because of what he believed, though.

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Paul m, if I recall my Sunday school lessons, had a vision; mentally stable people don’t have visions without substances or fevers or the like. Also he was a bit of a bastard before that too.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Well, your first two examples started sects of established religions. And they were also cults.

    Scientology amounts to a religion in a sense, though it’s just a very large cult that barely fits the usual concept of religion.

    But, yeah, if you buy into Jesus having done what’s said in the bible and/or believed by christians, dude was starting a sect at least. I’ve seen people debate if what he was teaching was really “just” a reformation of judaism, or an intentional schism intended to start something new-ish, but the story of the new testament is of a charismatic cult leader building a sect.

    Regardless of one’s faith in said charismatic cult leader, he didn’t do much that Koresh didn’t try. Managed to do a bit better than koresh or jones in that there was no mass suicide (and waco was that to an extent).

    • YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yup people hear a story of this fucker doing magic and his mother being a “virgin” yet people think he was real.

      He’s as real as Gandalf is.

  • SnailMagnitude@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The Christos is whatever you want the Christos to be, just craft one to your preferences.

    Marcion’s Christ different from gPhilip’s Christ, different from Qur’an Christ which is different from St Ignatias’ Christ and on it goes.

    I’d avoid the novel mundane Markan derived Christology from peeps like Ernest Renan that’s gone viral in the US, Ehrmanism I think…the most pointless of all the Christos’ to choose from, better with Netflix Christology.

  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    From what I recall there were multiple fairly popular prophecies about what a diety or sign from the heavens were supposed to look like and Jesus recreated a number of them in the form of miracles. Doesn’t really speak to his mental status, he coulda been delusional in his insistance of his diety status or he could have been a grifter, or it could all be legit or whatever.

  • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Add to the list Joseph Smith. But I think he was possibly a merely a pedophilic sociopath rather than having eg schizophrenia.